Quantcast
Channel: Human Rights Watch News
Viewing all 5846 articles
Browse latest View live

Kenya: Investigate Killings of Lawyer, Two Men

$
0
0

(Nairobi) – Kenyan authorities must urgently investigate the killing last week of three men, including a human rights lawyer, and ensure that those found responsible are held to account in fair trials, 34 Kenyan and international human rights organizations said today. Human rights activists will today hold demonstrations in Nairobi and other parts of Kenya to protest the heinous killings.

The shocking abduction, enforced disappearance and extrajudicial killings of lawyer Willie Kimani, as well as his client and their taxi driver that day, whose bodies were recovered from a river 73 kilometres northeast of Nairobi, should be cause for alarm over the state of human rights and rule of law in Kenya, especially in the face of reports suggesting that police officers were involved.

The perpetrators of the killing of Willie Kimani, Josephat Mwenda and Joseph Muiruri should face justice for this horrific crime.

The perpetrators of the killing of Willie Kimani, Josephat Mwenda and Joseph Muiruri should face justice for this horrific crime.


“These extrajudicial killings are a chilling reminder that the hard-won right to seek justice for human rights violations is under renewed attack,” said Muthoni Wanyeki, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East Africa, the Horn and the Great Lakes. “The Independent Policing Oversight Authority must initiate and lead prompt, independent, impartial and effective investigations into the abduction, enforced disappearance and extrajudicial execution of these three people with a view to bringing criminal charges against all those reasonably suspected of responsibility.”

The bodies of Willie Kimani, who was employed by International Justice Mission, a Christian legal aid charity, his client Josephat Mwenda, a motorcycle taxi rider, and Joseph Muiruri, a taxi driver, were recovered on June 30, 2016 from Ol-Donyo Sabuk River in Machakos County, eastern Kenya, a week after the three went missing in circumstances suggesting they were victims of enforced disappearance. Initial reports immediately suggested that Administration Police (AP), officers, one of whom Mwenda was defending himself against in court that day, may have abducted them.

The three were last seen as they left Mavoko Law Courts, in Machakos County, on June 23, 2016 where they had attended a hearing of a traffic case against Mwenda. Police officers from Syokimau AP Camp preferred traffic charges against Mwenda in December 2015, months after he had lodged a complaint with IPOA against a senior officer at the camp who had illegally shot him in April 2015 as he dismounted a motorcycle after the officers had waved him down to stop. Human rights organisations in Kenya have evidence indicating the three men were briefly held at Syokimau AP Camp soon after they were abducted. The men’s whereabouts after that remained unknown until their bodies were recovered seven days later.

“That these killings are coming before numerous similar allegations in other parts of the country have been adequately investigated is a matter of serious concern of the willingness of the Kenyan authorities to stem cases of police killings,” said Henry Maina, regional director at Article 19, Eastern Africa. “President Kenyatta must take decisive steps to assure Kenyans and the international community that the government is serious about addressing police killings.”

The Kenyan agencies responsible for investigations, including IPOA and police should ensure that all those reasonably linked to the killings are investigated and all available evidence properly preserved to ensure the credibility of the investigations, the organizations said.

“A transparent process of investigating and prosecuting those responsible is what is now needed to reassure shocked Kenyans of their safety and restore their faith in the national police,” said Kamau Ngugi, National Coordinator at Kenya’s National Coalition of Human Rights Defenders. “That a lawyer working for an international organisation and his client could be abducted and disappeared in broad-day light only to be found dead is a matter that cannot be taken lightly.”

It is, however, encouraging to note that in the early hours of July 1, before news of the bodies being found was publicly known, Inspector-General of Police Joseph Boinett ordered the arrest of three AP officers attached to the Syokimau AP Camp and further directed that all their colleagues at the camp be questioned about the disappearances.

On July 2, the Inspector General said three officers – Frederick Leliman, Stephen Chebulet and Sylvia Wanjiku – were being held over offences relating to the killings.

It cannot be business as usual when cases of police killings are emerging from many parts of the country each year. The government should urgently conduct a thorough investigation to ensure that perpetrators are held accountable and that these killings stop

Otsieno Namwaya

Africa Researcher at Human Rights Watch


“The Inspector General should now clarify whether the AP officer accused of shooting Mwenda in April 2015 is one of those under arrest,” said Otsieno Namwaya, Africa Researcher at Human Rights Watch. “It cannot be business as usual when cases of police killings are emerging from many parts of the country each year. The government should urgently conduct a thorough investigation to ensure that perpetrators are held accountable and that these killings stop.”

These outrageous crimes should not only be the concern of the police and IPOA, but should be addressed by all levels of Kenya’s leadership, including the national assembly and the head of state.

“The killing of these three young Kenyans in cold blood should concern President Uhuru Kenyatta,” said George Kegoro, Executive Director of the Kenya Human Rights Commission. “The head of state must immediately institute a full judicial commission of inquiry into the appropriation and misuse of the institution of the police and its resources for personal and criminal ends including, as in this case, extrajudicial killings.”

Kenya’s international partners – in particular Sweden, the UK and USA – that are currently providing financial support to the Kenya police units implicated in extrajudicial killings, should urge Kenyan authorities to ensure effective investigations into these killings and prosecution of those responsible. Supporting Kenyan security agencies without insisting on accountability for human rights violations makes donor countries complicit in those violations.

Signed hereunder:
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR)
Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC)
National Coalition on Human Rights Defenders (NCHRC)
Independent Medico Legal Unit (IMLU)
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
Article 19, Eastern Africa
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative
Defend Defenders
International Commission of Jurists (Kenya Chapter)
InformAction
Chapter Four, Uganda
Pan African Human Rights Defenders Network, Uganda
Foundation for Human Rights Initiative, Uganda
Rights Promotion and Protection Centre
Muslims for Human Rights
Haki Africa
Coalition for Constitution Implementation
Kenyans for Peace with Truth and Justice
Centre for Reproductive Rights
Bunge La Mwananchi
Coalition of Grassroots Human Rights Defenders
Kenyan Peasants League
Pan African Grassroots Women Liberation
World March of Women Kenya
Mathare Social Justice Centre
Bunge La Mwananchi, Kangemi
Kamukunji Human Rights Defenders Network
Women Arising
Dandora Must Change Social Movement
The Change Movement Kenya
Sauti Ya Umma, Kenya


Ban Forced Anal Exams Around World

$
0
0

(Geneva) – Forced anal examinations on men and transgender women accused of consensual same-sex conduct have been reported in at least eight countries in the last five years, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. These examinations lack evidentiary value and are a form of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment that may in some cases amount to torture.

The 82-page report, “Dignity Debased: Forced Anal Examinations in Homosexuality Prosecutions,” is based on interviews with 32 men and transgender women who underwent forced anal examinations in Cameroon, Egypt, Kenya, Lebanon, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, and Zambia. The examinations, which have the purported objective of finding “proof” of homosexual conduct, often involve doctors or other medical personnel forcibly inserting their fingers, and sometimes other objects, into the anus of the accused. Victims of forced anal testing told Human Rights Watch that they found the exams painful and degrading; some experienced them as a form of sexual violence.

Countries around the world should ban the practice of conducting forced anal examinations on men and transgender women accused of consensual same-sex conduct.

“Forced anal exams are invasive, intrusive, and profoundly humiliating, and clearly violate governments’ human rights obligations,” said Neela Ghoshal, senior researcher in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights program at Human Rights Watch. “No one, in 2016, should be subjected to torturous and degrading examinations that are based on invalidated theories from 150 years ago.”

The exams are rooted in discredited 19th century theories that homosexuals can be identified by the tone of the anal sphincter or the shape of the anus. International forensic medicine experts have found that the exams are useless, in addition to being cruel and degrading. The conclusion was shared even by several medical professionals Human Rights Watch interviewed who themselves had conducted anal exams.

Poster by Shams, a Tunisian activist group, condemning the use of forced anal exams.

English translation of poster text: Is it possible to refuse an anal test? From a legal point of view: It is possible to refuse an anal test when examined by a forensic doctor. But the reality is different. The victims often “accept” the test for fear of being tortured, because of their young age, or because they are unaware of their rights guaranteed by the Constitution. 

International human rights law prohibits torture as well as cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. Those prohibitions are explicitly reflected in the domestic laws of countries that have nonetheless allowed forced anal exams to take place. The United Nations special rapporteur on torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment has found that the exams are “intrusive and degrading” and “medically worthless,” amounting to “torture or ill-treatment.” The International Forensic Expert Group describes them as “a form of sexual assault and rape.”

Medical personnel who voluntarily conduct forced anal exams violate international principles of medical ethics, including the prohibition on medical personnel participating in any way in acts of torture or degrading treatment.

“I felt like I was an animal. I felt I wasn’t human,” said “Mehdi,” a Tunisian student subjected to an anal exam in December 2015. “When I got dressed, they put handcuffs on me and I went out, feeling completely in shock. I couldn’t absorb what was going on.”

“Louis,” who underwent a forced anal examination in Cameroon in 2007, at age 18, told Human Rights Watch nine years later: “I still have nightmares about that examination. Sometimes it keeps me up at night when I think about it. I never thought a doctor could do something like that to me.”

Some countries where authorities have used forced anal exams in the past, most notably Lebanon, have taken steps to end the practice. But others, including Egypt and Tunisia, rely on them with great frequency in prosecutions for consensual same-sex conduct. The use of forced anal examinations appears to be a recent phenomenon in Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia.

No one, in 2016, should be subjected to torturous and degrading examinations that are based on invalidated theories from 150 years ago.

Neela Ghoshal

Senior LGBT rights researcher

In Kenya, a disappointing High Court decision in June 2016 upheld the constitutionality of the exams. The judge found that the petitioners, two men who had been arrested on “unnatural offenses” charges and subjected to anal exams while in police custody, had consented to them. Petitioners said they were not informed about the tests and agreed only under duress while in police custody. The decision has been appealed.

All countries should ban the practice of forced anal examinations, and international and domestic human rights and health institutions should vigorously and vociferously oppose their use, Human Rights Watch said.
 
“No one should be arrested in the first place because of their private sexual conduct, but where such arrests do occur, forced anal exams add an extra layer of pointless brutality and abuse,” Ghoshal said. “Every country should guarantee basic rights and dignity to people accused of homosexual conduct, and recognize that the prohibition on torture extends to everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.”
 

Map of Kenya

Dispatches: Four Police Officers Charged With Triple-Murder in Kenya

$
0
0

Yesterday, in a packed Nairobi court room, I watched Kenyan prosecutors charge four police officers with murder for the deaths of lawyer Willie Kimani, his client Josephat Mwenda, and their taxi driver Joseph Muiruri. The police officers pleaded not guilty.

Willie Kimani, Joseph Muiruri and Josephat Mwenda, found dead on July 1, 2016.

Willie Kimani, Joseph Muiruri and Josephat Mwenda, found dead on July 1, 2016.

This widely-reported case is more than a murder trial; it is a signature moment for all concerned with police abuse and impunity. Yesterday, it was encouraging to see some progress in the investigation and judicial process.

Kimani worked for International Justice Mission (IJM), an American organization helping poor Kenyans fight malicious criminal charges and police extortion. Kimani had been representing Mwenda in his legal troubles stemming from an incident in April last year, when a police officer shot Mwenda during a routine traffic stop. Mwenda filed a complaint over the shooting with Kenya’s Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), a civilian police accountability institution. Later, police filed an avalanche of charges against Mwenda. His lawyers believed those charges were an effort to silence justice efforts.

The three men went missing after a court hearing into Mwenda’s pending charges three weeks ago. Eight days later, IJM announced that, after an extensive search, their bodies had been found in a river in Machakos County.  

The case is an opportunity to shed light on what happened and respond to the public’s anxiety about the risks in demanding greater police accountability. Thorough investigations and a fair trial for the defendants will be key factors in ensuring that – no matter the outcome – the justice process is credible.

The greatest legacy for Kimani, Mwenda, and Muiruri would be for their horrific deaths to kick start a more determined focus by the authorities to work with the communities most affected by allegations of abuses. 

The International Criminal Court at a Crossroads

$
0
0

July 17, the Day of International Criminal Justice, is the anniversary of the Rome Statute, which paved the way for the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Anniversaries are often cause for celebration, but the ICC—the world’s only permanent tribunal set up to try atrocity crimes—is at a crossroads. As the court hits its stride 18 years after the Rome Statute and 13 years into operation, a weak political climate on human rights threatens to undercut its role.

The International Criminal Court premises in The Hague. © 2016 Human Rights Watch

The International Criminal Court premises in The Hague.

The court has issued only four verdicts, but they have become increasingly significant. The latest, the conviction of a former Congolese vice-president for murders and rapes by rebel fighters under his command, should send a powerful message to other military commanders. Trials with other higher-profile accused—including the former president of Côte d’Ivoire—are underway or will start later this year.

But the power of the ICC’s treaty is also beginning to show.

That treaty allows the ICC prosecutor, if judges agree, to open investigations on the territory of any of the now-124 ICC member countries and to investigate the nationals of these countries.

Recently, the ICC made headlines in the United Kingdom, an ICC member, when the media reported that the ICC prosecutor had decided not to prosecute the former prime minister, Tony Blair, over the war in Iraq. In reality, while the court does not have jurisdiction over the decision to go to war in Iraq, the prosecutor is considering whether to open an investigation into alleged war crimes committed there by U.K. forces and has not ruled out any suspects.

To be sure, there have been major setbacks. ICC cases related to Kenya’s 2007-08 post-election violence collapsed, done in by investigative failures, interference with witnesses, and government obstruction. Court proceedings remain slow, and the institution needs to deepen its impact in local communities. But there is reason to believe that a decade from now the court will have become the indispensable court of last resort that its founders envisioned. 

One would expect strong efforts by ICC members to preserve what a singular moment in the 1990s made possible: a potentially global court to hold even the most powerful to account. . . . But lately governments can seem to verge on indifference.

Elizabeth Evenson

Associate Director, International Justice Program

And yet, the post-Cold War optimism that animated projects to consolidate international cooperation and the rule of law in 1998 barely exists in 2016. Crucial international institutions such as the U.N. Security Council are gripped by paralysis, unable to address protracted human rights crises, whether in Syria or South Sudan. 

This toughened climate for justice for international crimes has already been at play within Africa. African countries, which witnessed Western inaction in the face of the genocide in Rwanda, were among the court’s earliest proponents. However, once the ICC prosecutor pressed charges against sitting presidents, including Omar al-Bashir of Sudan and Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya, these leaders and their allies whipped up opposition to the court. They traded on the fact that until this year the court’s investigations were all within Africa, ignoring that the majority were sent to the ICC by African governments.

Many African human rights organizations continue to strongly support the ICC, and have countered the attacks by some African leaders, but this may only be the tip of the iceberg. As the work of the ICC expands to new continents, it will face similar, if not stiffer, backlash from political interests opposed to accountability. The U.S. refusal to prosecute torture by the Central Intelligence Agency demonstrates the entrenched double standards that the very idea of a one-day-universal ICC seeks to upend.

Indeed, it is difficult to imagine the ICC being set up in today’s political climate. One would expect strong efforts by ICC members to preserve what a singular moment in the 1990s made possible: a potentially global court to hold even the most powerful to account.

Activists from across Africa highlight the need for African governments to support the International Criminal Court in a video by 21 African and international nongovernmental organizations. 

Some countries have been steadfast in their support even when the political stakes were high. But lately governments can seem to verge on indifference. Some states persist in calls to limit the court’s budget, even when it is clear that the need for ICC action far outstrips its capacity. Many governments have yet to treat the court’s judicial elections with the seriousness they deserve.

The ICC’s managing body of countries has tended toward micromanagement of court administration while devoting fewer resources to enforce the judge’s decisions. Worse, it has been weak in the face of self-serving challenges to the court’s independence. A new test may be looming as the African Union considers asking for significant changes to the treaty—including barring the prosecution of sitting heads of state.                                     

The court’s direction in the years ahead depends in part on continued progress by court officials to strengthen its track record. But it depends even more on whether ICC member governments realize that what they have achieved could all too easily be lost.

Kenya: Disappearances, Deaths in Northeast

$
0
0

(Nairobi) – Kenyan security forces have forcibly disappeared at least 34 people in the past two years during abusive counterterrorism operations in Nairobi and in northeastern Kenya, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Kenyan authorities should end the abuses in counterterrorism operations and promptly investigate the enforced disappearances and deaths of detainees in the northeast.

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the famil

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the family’s home in August 2015. 

The 87-page report, “Deaths and Disappearances: Abuses in Counterterrorism Operations in Nairobi and in Northeastern Kenya,” documents 34 instances in multi-agency security operations in which the military was actively involved in raiding homes and compounds to arrest people who were allegedly suspected of links with the armed Islamist group, Al-Shabab. But months, and in some cases over a year, later, suspects have not been charged with any crimes and families cannot locate them. In each case, although families reported the disappearance to the police and sought help from various authorities, the authorities failed to inform them of the detainees’ whereabouts or to properly investigate allegations of abuse.
 

Families reported the disappearance of their relatives to the police and sought help from various authorities, but the authorities failed to inform them of the detainees’ whereabouts or to properly investigate allegations of abuse.

“People in northeastern Kenya deserve protection from Al-Shabab attacks, not further abuse from the authorities,” said Ken Roth, Executive Director at Human Rights Watch. “Rounding people up and refusing to disclose their whereabouts is a serious crime and only compounds fears and mistrust in the security forces.”

Human Rights Watch spent more than eight months investigating the abuses in Nairobi and in the northeastern counties of Garissa, Wajir, and Mandera, and interviewed 117 people including victims and witnesses of counterterrorism operations, Imams, government officials, journalists, lawyers, human rights activists, police and military officers, and local community leaders. Human Rights Watch also conducted follow-up interviews in Nairobi and by phone with victims and witnesses in the northeast.

Concern for the well-being of the 34 people is compounded by at least 11 cases in the past two years in which dead bodies of people previously arrested by state agents have been found, in some instances far from the location of their arrest. As far as Human Rights Watch is aware, police have not meaningfully investigated these deaths. In one instance, a body was exhumed in Mandera in response to public demands, but the government has not conducted an inquest or any meaningful investigations as required by Kenyan law.

Human Rights Watch found that those arbitrarily arrested during the security sweeps included young ethnic Somali Kenyans, Imams, and Islamic school teachers. They were detained, at least initially, in military bases and makeshift military camps in forests in the northeast and other parts of the country. In some cases, police officers arrested people, and then handed them over to the military.

A 48-year-old man told Human Rights Watch that police arrested him in May 2015, held him for two days at Wajir police station and then transferred him to Wajir military base. He said that military officers later arrested his elder brother and held them both at Wajir military base. The military officers kicked, slapped, and beat the man, and gave him electric shocks, then released him after 15 days. His brother’s whereabouts are unknown.

In another case, on March 21, 2015, four military officers arrested Abdiwelli Ibrahim Sheikh, 28, at home and witnesses saw military officers take him to Mandera military camp. He has not been seen again. “The security officers said they wanted to ask him a few questions and then they would set him free,” said a 50-year-old man who was with Abdiwelli at the time of his arrest. “We never knew he was being taken away for good.”

Families have searched far and wide for news about their loved ones, including in detention facilities, asked political and religious leaders for their help, and, in some cases, turned to social media to try to locate the missing relatives. Some families filed habeas corpus petitions, seeking a court order to compel the government to provide information. Officials, however, have denied any knowledge of the detainees’ whereabouts.

“If Kenyans are disappearing, police have the mandate to actively work with families and witnesses to locate these people,” Roth said. “The government’s silence speaks volumes.”

Counterterrorism law enforcement operations in northeast started soon after the September 2013 attack on Westgate mall in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, but intensified after the April 2015 attack on Garissa University College, in which 147 people, including 142 students, were killed. Al-Shabab claimed responsibility for both attacks. Al-Shabab has claimed responsibility for several other high profile attacks in Kenya, including in the northeast region.

In response to these attacks, the Kenya Defense Forces, Kenya police, National Intelligence Service, and Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) rangers have deployed to the northeastern region, in some cases working with other units in Nairobi.

Human Rights Watch believes that the 34 people are victims of enforced disappearance, defined in international law as any deprivation of liberty by state agents, followed by the state’s refusal to acknowledge the detention or concealing of the fate or whereabouts of the person. Kenya police and military did not reply to Human Rights Watch questions about the whereabouts of the 34 people.

There is no doubt that Kenya faces serious security challenges, but the authorities have an obligation to respond effectively and respect due process in any law enforcement operation

Ken Roth

Executive Director at Human Rights Watch

Government action to address abuses in counterterrorism operations is long overdue, Human Rights Watch said. The government should provide basic information regarding the identities, fate, and whereabouts of people arrested in these operations, and ensure basic due process rights for anyone who is arrested or in custody.

The Kenyan police and military should urgently investigate allegations of disappearances, deaths and torture in the northeast, and bring those responsible to justice. The president should establish a special commission of inquiry to investigate and establish the extent of the abuses in Kenya’s counterterrorism operations.

“There is no doubt that Kenya faces serious security challenges, but the authorities have an obligation to respond effectively and respect due process in any law enforcement operation,” Roth said. “The disappearances and uninvestigated deaths in the northeast are illegal and risk alienating local communities, whose cooperation is needed.”

Selected accounts from people interviewed for the report:

“They told Omar that they wanted to ask him questions related to national security after which they would set him free. They did not introduce themselves but they are well-known Criminal Investigations Department (CID) officers so Omar did not ask them to identify themselves. That was the last time we saw him.”
 – A man whose relative, Omar Yusuf, was arrested in the town of Mandera in April 2015.

“The officers carried the five men and threw them in the Land Cruiser-like vehicles that had Africa Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) insignia and drove away. We later came to understand from various accounts of those who spotted the vehicles on the road, [that they were moving] in the direction of Somalia.”
 – A 50-year-old man who was present when Kenya Defense Forces officers raided a restaurant in the town of Garissa, shooting and arresting five men, including Hassan Abdullahi, whose whereabouts remain unknown.

“Police at Garissa police station have never helped us and I don’t think they care. They told us that on that day they also heard gunshots but they denied knowledge of what had happened. The Garissa county commissioner told us he knew nothing about what had happened but he was clearly not willing to help find out. A National Intelligence Service officer told us that he had tried to call police on the phone after he heard gunshots to inquire what was happening. Within minutes, he received a call from a concealed line ordering him to vacate the area and never talk about the issue again.”
 – A 25-year-old relative of one of the missing men.

“[My brother] was picked up from his home town where he was born, where he grew up, where he had children, and now no one knows whether he is alive or not. So everyone can feel how painful that is. To see the dead body of your family member is painful but you at least know he is dead.”
 – A man whose brother has not been seen since police arrested him on April 26, 2015.

Deaths and Disappearances

$
0
0

Summary

No one here reports to police because they fear for their lives. . . . There are people who have been missing for more than nine months. Some are taken for a few weeks or days for questioning and then returned, so it is a situation that disturbs every Wajir resident. People fear and keep asking themselves who the next victim will be.

-Wajir resident, October 22, 2015

On June 29, 2015, three men went to the home of 45-year-old Farah Ibrahim Korio, an ethnic Somali Kenyan and teacher of Islamic education in Wajir, northeastern Kenya. When they did not find him, they threatened to arrest his wife and five children if they did not disclose his whereabouts. The men had no uniforms that could have identified them as police men, neither did they reveal their identity nor divulge why they were looking for Farah. They then arrested and whisked away the shopkeeper at a nearby shop, mistaking him for Farah, but dumped him on the road miles away when they realized their error. The men later directed the area chief to find Farah for them.

When Farah learned that some unknown people were looking for him, he reported the matter at the Wajir police station. When his family approached Wajir county police commander on his whereabouts, he said he did not have any categorical information about who was looking for Farah, as there were many officers from different Kenyan security agencies in Wajir, many of whom were not under his command, including the police’s anti-terrorism unit (ATPU), military intelligence and administration police.

Families reported the disappearance of their relatives to the police and sought help from various authorities, but the authorities failed to inform them of the detainees’ whereabouts or to properly investigate allegations of abuse.

Farah agreed to meet the area chief at Wajir police station the next day and shortly after arriving, and within minutes of the area chief’s arrival at the station, the same three men drove into the police compound, according to witnesses. A uniformed police officer told some of Farah’s family members that the three men were military intelligence officers. The family briefly went to pray just outside the police station as the officers talked to Farah. That was the last time Farah’s family saw him.

Back at the police station, the police informed them that the three officers had taken Farah to the ATPU offices nearby. The ATPU denied to the family having seen him and suggested that he might be in Wajir military camp.

Farah’s family has been searching for him for over a year. He is one of at least 34 people, including two women, according to Human Rights Watch research, taken into custody by security forces during counterterrorism operations in northeastern Kenya between 2013 and 2015, whose whereabouts remain unknown. Families of those missing have searched detention facilities far and wide, sought help from political and religious leaders, complained to the state-funded Kenya National Commission on Human Rights and in some cases, boldly taken to social media in attempts to locate their loved ones. Kenya authorities have denied knowledge of the missing people, failed to acknowledge credible evidence of abuses during counterterrorism operations, failed to investigate the allegations and in some instances, intimidate and harass those seeking information and accountability.

Expand

Human Rights Watch believes that these 34 people are victims of enforced disappearance, defined in international law as any deprivation of liberty by state agents followed by the state’s refusal to acknowledge the detention or concealing of the fate or whereabouts of the person.In addition, bodies of at least 11 people previously arrested by state agents have been found in the last two years, in some instances far from the location of their arrest. As far as Human Rights Watch is aware, police have not meaningfully investigated these deaths. A body was exhumed in Mandera in December 2015 at the initiative of area leaders and nongovernmental organizations and even then, there has been no inquest, as required by Kenyan law.

Witness statements suggest the 34 believed to have been disappeared and the 11 killed, predominantly ethnic Somali Kenyans, may have been under investigation for alleged links to or knowledge of Al-Shabab, the Somalia-based Islamist armed group. The group has carried out numerous deadly attacks on civilians in Kenya in recent years, including the brutal killing of at least 142 students at Garissa University in Garissa county, northeastern Kenya in April 2015. Such attacks are criminal and unjustifiable at all times, regardless of motivation.

Governments have a duty under international human rights law to take all reasonable steps to protect people within their jurisdictions from acts of violence. Governments also have a duty to ensure that alleged abuses by security forces result in impartial investigations into abuses by security forces, which identify those responsible, and suspects are prosecuted before independent courts. Under international law, all suspects, including those linked to terrorism, are supposed to receive due process. These obligations require ensuring fairness and due process in investigations and prosecutions, as well as humane treatment of those in custody.

This report documents abuses involving law enforcement agencies related to operations aimed at thwarting the threat posed by Al-Shabab in counties in northeastern Kenya between December 2013 and December 2015.

Contrary to Kenya’s obligations under international human rights law, the operations of security agencies have sometimes, been marked by killings, enforced disappearances, torture and arbitrary arrests of ethnic Somali Kenyans.

For this report, Human Rights Watch interviewed over 117 people in Garissa county in September, Wajir county in October and Mandera county in December 2015, as well as Nairobi in July and November 2015 and January 2016, and spoke to victims of arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions and mistreatment, witnesses to arrests and raids, security officials, including KDF and police officers with inside knowledge of the operations, political leaders in the national and county government, human rights defenders, clerics and journalists.

This report documents how security officers from various units raided homes and compounds, business premises and schools to arrest individuals and conduct searches, sometimes in the middle of the night. Some of those arrested have never been seen again. The security officers who carried out arrests or searches documented in this report were, in most cases, not uniformed and did not have identification insignia and failed to identify themselves, making it difficult for families to trace their relatives or seek justice. In some cases, security officers wore balaclavas or masks during arrests and, in a majority of cases they blindfolded those they detained for long periods, further compounding problems of identifying units or individual officers.

Relatives and friends of victims believed the individuals behind these operations are Kenyan security forces because in a few instances, they wore uniforms associated with Kenyan security – either police or military – while in others, even when they were not uniformed, they carried identity cards from either police or military or drove vehicles with official government insignia. In a few cases documented by Human Rights Watch, arresting officers were spotted driving with arrestees into police stations or military bases/camps. The targets of these operations are most often males between 20 and 40 years old and some are either imams or Islamic education teachers (also locally known as dugsi or duksi in Somali) and their students, or have some responsibilities in their local mosques.

In all of the cases documented in this report, families of those arrested and witnesses of operations said that security officers did not present a search or arrest warrant. Although Kenya’s Criminal Procedure Act provides for arrest without a warrant, it requires police to bring any such suspect to court within 24 hours. Officers have regularly failed to present suspects in court in a timely way during the ongoing law enforcement operations in the northeast.

Families have sought in vain for information regarding the whereabouts of those arrested. In some cases, families have filed habeas corpus petitions, seeking a court order to compel the state to provide information. Each time, even where there is a court order, officials have denied any knowledge of the detainees’ whereabouts.

In the course of research, Human Rights Watch wrote letters to the Kenyan police, military, wildlife service, and each agencies’ respective ministers, querying the whereabouts and well-being of those who had been arrested and providing approximate dates and locations of where each person was last seen. The wildlife service replied and denied any knowledge of the arrestees. No other government official responded to the queries.

Past research by Human Rights Watch and Kenyan human rights non-governmental organizations over the past four years has implicated the ATPU and Kenya’s anti-riot police, known as the General Service Unit (GSU), in killings and disappearances in Nairobi and at the Kenyan coast. Since Al-Shabab attacks escalated in late 2014 in the northeastern region, officers from numerous security units – the Kenya Defense Forces, Kenya police, National Intelligence Service and Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) rangers – have deployed their forces in the region. Journalists and local politicians have raised numerous allegations of enforced disappearances, killings, arbitrary arrests, and unidentified bodies found in shallow graves, according to media reports and witness accounts.

The Kenyan government should urgently address allegations of abuses in counterterrorism operations, provide information regarding the identities, and whereabouts of people arrested in these operations, and ensure basic due process rights for all individuals arrested or currently in custody.

Kenya should comply with the provisions of its own constitution and fulfil its obligations under international human rights law. The government should ensure that the law is followed during all operations and that members of the military and Kenya Wildlife Service, who have no legal mandate to make arrests, do not arrest and detain people. The government also should ensure that all those arrested by police are properly registered in police records and detained in police stations, not in military facilities or the bush as has sometimes occurred.

President Uhuru Kenyatta should publicly acknowledge the scope and gravity of the numerous allegations and condemn any such abuses by security forces. He should direct security forces to comply with international human rights law, end enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and torture, and direct the security agencies and prosecutors to take all necessary steps to hold those responsible to account. Furthermore, he should establish an independent and credible multi-agency commission to investigate and report on the scope of abuses in counterterrorism operations country-wide.

Despite numerous reports of serious abuses from diverse sources over several years, Kenya remains a critical partner in counterterrorism efforts in East Africa, and the recipient of significant donor assistance from the United States, the United Kingdom and to a lesser extent, the European Union, among others. Human Rights Watch urges Kenya’s international partners to publicly denounce these abuses, call for investigations and accountability, and to ensure any support to Kenya’s security forces – including training, logistics, and other material support – does not go to units or commanders implicated in enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings or torture. Donors should consistently press for credible investigations and prosecutions of perpetrators, and consider providing forensic support for such investigations.

Key Recommendations

To the President of Kenya

  • Direct security forces to end enforced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killings and arbitrary arrests of suspects. Direct relevant officers and prosecutors to take all necessary steps to investigate allegations of abuse and hold those criminally responsible to account.
  • Urgently establish an independent and credible multiagency commission to investigate and regularly report on the ongoing cases of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and torture in northeastern Kenya and other parts of Kenya.
  • Appoint someone of high-standing with demonstrable commitment to human rights and rule of law to serve as the focal point of information for families searching for their relatives.

To the Security Forces

  • Urgently provide information on the whereabouts of the disappeared people. Promptly charge those against whom there is credible evidence, in proceedings that adhere to international due-process standards, and release all others, providing compensation to those unlawfully detained.
  • Ensure that anyone detained in Kenya, including those suspected of links to Al-Shabab, are detained in compliance with Kenyan law, including being held in officially gazetted places of detention, are brought promptly before a judge, and are provided prompt access to legal counsel and family members.

To Kenya’s Parliament

  • Hold a debate on the abuses by security forces in the northeastern region and other parts of the country with the view to adopting a motion to compel the Kenyan government to establish an independent, impartial, multiagency commission of inquiry to investigate the abuses.
  • Initiate a parliamentary commission of inquiry into the abuses in the northeast either to complement investigations by the independent commission to be established by the Executive or serve as an alternative in the event that the Executive fails to initiate credible investigations.

To the United States, United Kingdom and European Union

  • Publicly denounce human rights abuses in Kenya as and when information is available and underscore the importance of respect for human rights as a requirement of working with the Kenyan security forces.
  • Ensure that any support to Kenya’s security forces – including training, logistics, and other material support – does not go to units or commanders implicated in torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings.

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

AMISOM: African Union Mission to Somalia.

AP: Administration Police, one of the two branches of the Kenya Police Service initially used for administrative purposes by the defunct provincial administration but now largely deployed as VIP guards.

ATPU: Anti-Terrorism Police Unit, a unit within the Directorate of Criminal Investigation with the primary function of countering terrorism.

CID: Criminal Investigation Department, a department of the Kenya Police Service, now known as Directorate of Criminal Investigation (DCI).

CPF:Counterterrorism Partnership Fund, a fund within the US Department of Defense for supporting counterterrorism.

DCI: Directorate of Criminal Investigation (formerly CID), a department of the Kenya Police Service.

DMI: Directorate of Military Intelligence, a department of the Kenyan Defense Forces.

GSU: General Service Unit, an anti-riot police unit with paramilitary training.

IMLU: Independent Medico Legal Unit, a Kenyan nongovernmental organization.

IPOA: Independent Policing Oversight Authority, a civilian police accountability mechanism established by an act of parliament.

KDF: Kenya Defense Forces, the Kenyan military.

KNCHR: Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, a statutory body that is government-funded and has a mandate to monitor and investigate human rights abuses throughout Kenya.

KPR: Kenya Police Reservists, also known as National Police Reservists under the 2010 constitution, Kenyan reserve police recruited on two year contracts to support police in specific regions. They were called Home Guards in the colonial era.

KPS: Kenya Police Service, the Kenyan police comprised of the administration police and the regular police.

KWS: Kenya Wildlife Service, a statutory body charged with conserving and protecting Kenya’s wildlife resources.

NCTC: National Counter Terrorism Council, a statutory Kenyan multi-agency organ created in 2014 to coordinate counterterrorism efforts countrywide.

NIS: National Intelligence Service, a department of the Kenya Police Service that is responsible for intelligence gathering, but it is not directly answerable to the Inspector General of Police (IGP). NIS is answerable to the president with oversight by parliament.

NSC: National Security Council, the most senior security organ in Kenya, responsible for national security policy and strategy, chaired by the president.

OB: Occurrence Book, an official register book in each police station where officers record what occurs, including the arrests made during the hours they are on duty. Any arrests or pending charges against someone held in the police jail is required by law to be recorded in the OB. It is also an official record of complaints made to police which require police follow-up action. By law, an “OB number” is supposed to be issued for each complaint filed with police.

OCS: Officer Commanding Station, officer in charge of a police station.

RBPU: Rural Border Patrol Unit, a unit of the Administration Police deployed to patrol Kenyan borders.

RDU: Rapid Deployment Unit, a unit of the Administration Police for rapid response to hot spots.

Methodology

This report is based on Human Rights Watch research in Nairobi, Garissa, Wajir and Mandera counties in northeastern Kenya all counties in which community members had raised concerns about the whereabouts of people who had been arrested in law enforcement operations. Researchers visited and conducted interviews in villages and towns in Garissa for two weeks in September 2015, in Wajir for one week in October 2015, and in Mandera for two days in December 2015. Follow-up interviews with victims, witnesses, national government officials, members of the diplomatic community, human rights defenders, Somali community leaders and political leaders took place in Nairobi between July 2015 and March 2016. Most interviews were conducted in person but some were carried out by telephone.

Human Rights Watch interviewed 117 people in total, of whom 53 described themselves as victims of arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions and mistreatment and who witnessed others similarly treated while in detention. Six victims provided credible statements that they were tortured in military camps and bases, which was further corroborated by both physical evidence and other witnesses.

We also interviewed nine security officials, including Kenyan Defense Forces and police officers with inside knowledge of counterterrorism operations, eight political leaders at both national and county government level, 11 human rights defenders who have been involved in the search for the victims or have documented abuses, six clerics, and four journalists who have investigated cases of disappearances and killings in northeastern Kenya. Some of the cases investigated further corroborate those documented by the state-funded Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) in their report “The Error of Fighting Terror with Terror” published in September 2015.

Human Rights Watch has withheld the identities of the interviewees in order to protect them from possible reprisals by Al-Shabab and Kenyan security agencies or officials. Where necessary, names have been withheld or replaced by randomized initials in order to protect identities. All interviews with victims and witnesses were conducted confidentially, in safe locations away from their homes or communities, in English, Swahili or Somali, with the aid of interpreters where necessary. Interviews with police, KDF, Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and other government officials were conducted in English, either in person or through a questionnaire mailed to the relevant officials. The identities of some KDF and police officers who were interviewed have been concealed for security reasons, in most cases at the request of the interviewees. No compensation for interviews was requested and none was provided. The victims of abuses discussed in this report who are ethnic Somali Kenyans are identified by their first names, in line with the Somali naming tradition.

Human Rights Watch received allegations of more than 100 cases of killings and enforced disappearances in the three counties. In many cases, Human Rights Watch could not fully corroborate the allegations due to several factors, including challenges in accessing remote parts of the region, security concerns, difficulties in tracing individuals with specific first-hand information of events, and a pervasive fear of reprisals which limited the number of people willing to be interviewed. Human Rights Watch omitted any case in which there was only a single source of information. The list of individuals contained in this report (see Annex 1) includes only those for whom there were multiple sources of information and corroboration.

On March 24, 2016, Human Rights Watch wrote to the Inspector General of Police, the Chief of Kenya Defense Forces and the Director General of the Kenya Wildlife Service setting out preliminary research findings and requesting information on the wide range of human rights concerns contained in this report, including the whereabouts of detainees (see Annex 2). At time of writing, we have not received a response from the officials of the Kenya Police Service and Kenya Defense Force. The relevant officials from the two agencies also did not reply to our request for in-person meetings to discuss the findings. KWS director general Kitili Mbathi responded on June 28, 2016. He noted that while Kenyan law allows KWS to carry out law enforcement operations alongside other security agencies, it has restricted its work to anti-poaching and has no knowledge of whereabouts of the people alleged to have been arrested by his officials (see Annex 3). Some names and dates as listed in letters from Human Rights Watch to government actors have been edited in this report at the chart in annex 1 to ensure accuracy in spelling.

On April 27, 2016, Human Rights Watch wrote follow-up letters to the cabinet secretary for Interior and National Coordination who oversees police, the cabinet secretary for Defense, who oversees the military and the cabinet secretary for Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Authorities, who oversees the Kenya Wildlife Service (see Annex 4), urging a response to the research queries and re-stating Human Rights Watch’s desire and willingness to discuss the cases of concern. At time of writing, we have not received a response from any of the cabinet secretaries.

I. Background

Kenya’s military role in Somalia

On October 15, 2011, Kenya sent troops across the border to pursue the Somalia-based Islamist armed group Al-Shabab, which Kenyan authorities blamed for a spate of kidnappings of mostly foreign tourists and aid workers along the Indian Ocean coast and in Dadaab refugee camp.[1] Even though Kenyan authorities cited the kidnappings in 2011 as the motive for the deployment to Somalia, Al-Shabab’s activities had long generated security concerns.[2]

Between 2009 and 2011, gun and grenade attacks in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi, at the coast, and in the northeastern region – which Kenyan authorities blamed on Al-Shabab – killed or injured scores of people, including security officers.[3] The deployment of Kenyan military forces to Somalia triggered warnings from Al-Shabab that it would begin waging attacks inside Kenya in retaliation for what it considered an act of aggression by an “occupation force.”[4] Mandera and Garissa counties, the coastal counties of Lamu and Mombasa, and Nairobi, are some of the regions most affected by the attacks blamed largely on Al-Shabab.[5]

Kenyan troops are now part of the African Union mission, known as AMISOM, aimed at uprooting Al-Shabab and propping up the embattled Somalia government which has been in power since 2012.[6] Five years after Kenya entered Somalia, Al-Shabab continues to control significant swathes of territory inside Somalia, and to carry out deadly attacks throughout Somalia and inside Kenya.

Al-Shabab Attacks in Kenya and Kenya’s Response

In recent years, Al-Shabab has launched a number of high profile attacks in Kenya, and publicly claimed responsibility for them.[7] In September 2013, for example, in an attack on the upmarket Westgate mall in Nairobi, Al-Shabab militants killed at least 67 people and injured hundreds of others.[8] This was followed by another high-profile attack at the Kenyan coast that started with a night raid on Mpeketoni centre, Lamu county, on June 14, 2014 in which at least 48 were killed.[9] Over the subsequent six weeks there were other attacks in Lamu county and neighboring Tana River county in which Al-Shabab killed at least 87 people. Government forces were seemingly unable to respond effectively to protect residents.[10]

In November 2014, an Al-Shabab attack on a bus killed 28 people in Mandera.[11] The following month, the group attacked quarry workers in Mandera town, killing 36, all of them non-Muslims and non-locals.[12] In April 2015, Al-Shabab launched its most lethal attack yet, in a dawn massacre on Garissa University College in northeastern Kenya, killing 147 people, including at least 142 students.[13]Since then, Al-Shabab has claimed responsibility for sporadic attacks in Lamu and Mandera.[14]

On June 14, 2015, the Kenyan military claimed it killed 11 Al-Shabab fighters after an attempted attack on a military base in Lamu county during which at least two Kenyan soldiers were also killed.[15] On July 7, 2015, suspected Al-Shabab fighters attacked and killed 14 people believed to be quarry workers in Mandera. The 14 were killed at night in their houses just next to Mandera military camp.[16]

Al-Shabab militants often singled out victims, at least in Kenya, based on religion, killing those who could not recite shahada, [17] the Islamic creed, in what was seen by some political and security analysts as Al-Shabab’s attempt to stoke religious tensions in Kenya.[18]

When claiming responsibility for these attacks, Al-Shabab leadership in press statements or via social media often cited the presence of Kenyan troops in Somalia and threatened to launch further attacks inside Kenya if the country failed to withdraw its military from Somalia.[19] During the Westgate attacks, for example, Al-Shabab operatives stated on Twitter that “[f]or long we have waged war against the Kenyans in our land, now it’s time to shift the battleground and take the war to their land.”[20]

In most cases, alleged Al-Shabab attackers who were killed during attacks were later identified as being neither Somali Kenyans nor Somali nationals.[21] Some alleged “masterminds” of attacks in Kenya, such as Somali national Adan Garar, have reportedly been killed in US drone strikes in Somalia.[22]

Kenya has responded to attacks with abusive and discriminatory operations targeting Somali refugees, ethnic Somali Kenyans and Muslims.[23] Kenyan authorities have publicly blamed refugees, and in most cases targeted Somali Kenyans and Muslims in law enforcement operations. However, those arrested for some of the attacks include non-Somali Kenyans and in a few cases, non-Kenyans.[24] To some extent, Al-Shabab has been able to exploit local grievances in Kenya, including the government’s discriminatory law enforcement operations, to propagate its agenda and justify its attacks. The government has announced that Dadaab refugee camp,[25] which is currently home to over 300,000 Somali refugees, will be closed later this year, a move that Kenyan human rights organizations have said was not only unlawful but counterproductive to Kenya’s security.[26]

Human Rights Watch and Kenyan human rights organizations have over the years documented the Kenyan government’s abusive counterterrorism operations. In late 2013, Muslims for Human Rights and Open Society Justice Initiative documented several cases of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings of Muslim clerics and youth at the Kenyan coastal city of Mombasa by the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit (ATPU).[27] In August 2014 Human Rights Watch reported on at least ten cases of enforced disappearances and another ten cases of extrajudicial killings by the ATPU in Nairobi’s Majengo neighborhood.[28]

In April 2014, Kenyan security forces launched “Usalama Watch,” Which according to then Interior Minister Joseph Ole Lenku, was an operation involving a 6,000 strong police contingent deployed to Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood to arrest foreign nationals who were in the country unlawfully and anyone suspected of terrorist links.[29]The operation largely targeted Somalis and ethnic Somali Kenyans but also Ethiopians, South Sudanese, and Kenyan Muslim populations in Nairobi’s Eastleigh and “South C” neighborhoods, Mombasa’s Likoni area, and in other towns in central Kenya and the coast region.[30]

Human Rights Watch found that government security forces raided homes, buildings, and shops, looted cell phones, money, and other goods, harassed and extorted money from residents, and detained thousands – including Kenyan citizens and international workers – without charge and in appalling conditions for periods well beyond the 24-hour limit set by Kenyan law.[31]

In the aftermath of the attack on Mpeketoni center and other villages in Lamu and Tana River in 2014, Human Rights Watch and Kenya Human Rights Commission had found that Kenyan security forces were slow to respond, leaving villages unprotected. When they eventually responded, their actions were often discriminatory, beating, arbitrarily detaining and stealing personal property from Muslim and ethnic Somalis in the two counties. Despite numerous law enforcement operations along the coast, hundreds were arrested and mistreated only to have charges dropped for lack of evidence and no one held responsible for the attacks.[32]

II. Counterterrorism operations in Northeastern Kenya

Operational units and agencies

In the northeast counties of Mandera, Wajir and Garissa, multiple security agencies and units, with varied and conflicting command hierarchies and very limited effective civilian oversight, are operational. Some forces are arresting and detaining suspects without any legal mandate. As multiple police units, military and wildlife services are deployed, it is increasingly unclear who is commanding operations and where families should go to locate relatives in custody.

Under Kenya’s constitution, the police are mandated to preserve law and order and to prevent and detect crime. Currently, Kenya’s police force is comprised of the regular police and the Administration Police, each headed by a deputy inspector general, who both report to the Inspector General of Police.[33]

The National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC), created through an amendment to a set of Security Laws in December 2014,[34]is responsible for coordinating the counterterrorism efforts of all the security forces and compiling information they are to use in such efforts.[35] The center’s director is appointed by the National Security Council, which is chaired by the president, and NCTC has the prerogative to expand the membership of the center to include other government agencies.

The exact role of the NCTC and the National Security Council, which has legal authority to supervise all security organs,[36] in the law enforcement operations ongoing at time of writing in the northeast remains unclear. Given their legal mandate, it is very likely the two are pivotal, if not altogether responsible for supervisory control, for the operations.[37]

Numerous units that are by law coordinated by the National Counterterrorism Center are involved in carrying out the operations in the northeast. Unlike the past when their involvement was peripheral, Criminal Investigations Department (CID) officers are directly involved in counterterrorism operations in the northeast.[38] CID is headed by a director who reports directly to the Inspector General of Police.[39] The ATPU,[40] which is a specialized counterterrorism police unit that was created within CID in 2003 is also active in northeastern operations.[41]

The National Intelligence Service, which is the intelligence branch of the police and at time of writing headed by a former military intelligence officer, as well as other units from the Administration Police (AP) are also actively involved.[42] In particular, the Rapid Deployment Unit (RDU) and the Rural Border Patrol Unit (RBPU), both units of the Administration Police, have allegedly been involved in the abuses in the northeast.[43]

Human Rights Watch research indicated that, unlike in the past, the involvement of the General Service Unit (GSU), which is the anti-riot police whose head reports to the deputy inspector general in charge of the regular police, in the ongoing abuses in the northeast has been very limited, and mainly in Garissa county.[44]Officers of the Kenya Police Reservist (KPR), also known as the National Police Reservists (NPR) or the home guards in some cases, have also beaten and arrested alleged suspects in Wajir and Mandera.[45]

Based on credible evidence available to Human Rights Watch, the Kenyan military’s involvement in the northeast counterterrorism operations is much more intensive and elaborate than its role in operations in Lamu and Tana River counties a year ago.[46]The Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI),[47] is at the forefront of these operations, according to one police and one military officer who spoke to Human Rights Watch.[48]The DMI detains those arrested, apparently in large numbers, inside military bases and camps in Wajir, Garissa, Mandera and even Lamu and Nakuru counties.[49]

Human Rights Watch found that police officers routinely handed over detainees to the military – including in at least six instances to the detachments of KDF troops based in Somalia and those deployed to Garissa, Wajir and Mandera – whom evidence suggests are in charge of the interrogations and determining the fate of detainees.[50]

Witnesses in Wajir said victims would be driven by their captors to Wajir military camp, while in Mandera witnesses said victims would be driven to Mandera military base. Others said they were regularly moved around between detention facilities in the northeast and even Nairobi or forests as far as Lamu county.

The involvement of the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) rangers in the operations in the northeast, especially in Garissa and Wajir, continues to be a matter of concern.[51] KWS rangers are wildlife agents responsible for wildlife conservation and protection and the head, a Director General, reports to the cabinet secretary for environment.[52] The KWS has no legal mandate to arrest or detain suspects in counterterrorism operations.

The patterns of abuses and the type of security agencies implicated varied from county to county. The involvement of some members of KDF and the two AP units, the RBPU and the RDU – was more apparent in Wajir and Mandera. The role of some KWS rangers and ATPU officers, who were nonetheless operational across the northeast, was clearer in Garissa county.

Obstacles to identifying abusers

Security forces carrying out arrests in northeast made considerable efforts to conceal their identity during operations.[53] The security officers who carried out the arrests or searches, for example, did not often wear uniforms and did not have identification insignia as required both under Kenyan law and under security force regulations.[54] In some cases, arresting officers wore balaclavas or masks during arrests, and failed or refused to identify themselves or disclose the police stations or military camps or bases to which they were attached thus making it difficult for families to trace their relatives or seek justice.[55] This violates section 57 of the National Police Service Act which requires arresting officers to identify themselves beforehand and record the arrest in an occurrence book.

In many cases, people being arrested were blindfolded for long periods thus making it difficult for them to identify arresting officers or know where they were being held.[56] Long periods of blindfolding for up to two or three months in some instances also had health implications, such as visual impairment, which affected detainees’ abilities to identify their location in detention. Three arrestees told Human Rights Watch they had eyesight problems months after their release.[57]

At least seven of the eleven people who were later found dead were arrested by officers using hired taxicabs during operations.[58]In many instances, security officers drove unmarked cars, in most cases without registration number plates or, in the few cases where the cars had registration plates, it appears that the plates were regularly exchanged between different vehicles.[59]

Security agencies, particularly the police, violated procedure by failing to identify themselves, notify those being arrested of their rights or present them to court within the required time.

Witnesses and victims told Human Rights Watch that the arrests were physically brutal, treatment that violates standard procedures established in law. Officers appear to have gone out of their way to place victims out of the protection of the law. For example, security officers failed to register the arrests in the police occurrence books and denied detainees access to family and lawyers. Many people were arrested by military intelligence officers, who are not authorized to arrest people under Kenyan law, and detained in military facilities in Wajir, Garissa, Mandera or in some cases were airlifted to military detention facilities as far as Lamu or Nakuru counties, both more than 500 kilometers away.[60]

Human Rights Watch found that on at least six occasions, KDF detained and interrogated people in makeshift camps in forests in Garissa, Wajir and Mandera or in some cases in Boni forest, which includes parts of Garissa, Tana River and Lamu counties.[61] Apart from being unlawful, because these areas are not designated as detention facilities, this practice also confused those who had been arrested as to which security unit or agency was detaining them.

The profile of victims

Those targeted for arrest in the cases Human Rights Watch documented are mostly men in their 20s, with a few in their 30s and 40s, and it appears that some were either imams or Islamic education teachers in madrasas, locally known as dugsi, or their students or other Muslims with responsibilities in their local mosques.[62] Imams in mosques or Islamic schools where youth had previously been arrested for alleged links with Al-Shabab, as was the case of Mandera Islamic Centre, said they and their colleagues were frequently targeted for questioning, arbitrary arrests and, in some cases, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings.[63]

In all the cases documented, the victims were either under investigation over offences related to their links with Al-Shabab or only learned at the time of arrest that they were suspected of links with Al-Shabab.[64]At least some of those arrested appear to have been targeted because they were relatives or friends of others who had been suspected of links with Al-Shabab. In some instances arrestees had publicly called for respect for the rights of those arrested or protested the detention of their friends.[65]

Two security operatives privy to the operations in the northeast told Human Rights Watch that security officers, in most cases military intelligence officers, often decide how detainees should be treated, including if they should be executed, based on their judgement of the individual’s guilt.[66]Some interviewees said that they believe that after interrogations, security agencies allegedly subject some detainees to mock trials and release those they assessed as “innocent,” but detained those believed to be at the initial stages of recruitment by Al-Shabab to help with investigations and executed those they believed to be deeply involved.[67] Human Rights Watch was unable to verify these allegations.

III. The Abuses

Enforced Disappearances

This is the government disappearing our people. How can we trust them with fair investigations and trial? It is meaningless to expect anything from the police or the courts.

-Man in Garissa, September 10, 2015

Human Rights Watch documented 34 cases of enforced disappearances in Nairobi and northeastern Kenya, 16 from Garissa county, eight from Mandera county, six from Wajir county and four from Nairobi. Relatives have continued to look for these 34 individuals, making numerous inquiries at police stations but each time, authorities have failed to acknowledge arresting, or detaining the missing person. In most cases, these individuals were never registered as detained at the nearest police station as required by Article 50 of the National Police Service Act on police records.

The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, which Kenya has signed but not ratified, defines an enforced disappearance as “the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the state or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the state, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of the liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.”[68]Signing a treaty creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the purpose of the treaty. Kenyan officials’ failure to acknowledge arresting or detaining the missing people or investigate their whereabouts does just that.

The Mandera cases

Abdiwelli Ibrahim Sheikh and Feisal Mohamed Ibrahim

Abdiwelli and Feisal, together with two other young men from the same neighborhood in Mandera town were arrested from their houses on March 18, 2015 and taken to Mandera military camp. A report of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights notes that some of those who arrested them were driving in an armored military vehicle.[69]

A man who witnessed the arrest told Human Rights Watch that four non-uniformed security officers driving a white Toyota Probox car and armed with pistols arrested Abdiwelli at around 2 p.m. One remained outside the house, according to the man, and three went inside. He said: “They handcuffed Abdiwelli and said they were police officers but they went to the military camp. I saw them enter the military camp because my house is near.”[70]

Another person who witnessed the arrests, said that the same group of officers later arrested Feisal from his house and later learned from someone who saw Feisal in detention that he had been taken to the Mandera military camp.[71] The officers who arrested Feisal did not say why or where they were taking him. According to this person, the security officers said “they wanted to ask him a few questions and then they would release him. We never knew he was being taken away for good.”[72]

Although security officers said during arrest that they were suspected of having links with Al-Shabab, relatives told Human Rights Watch they believed Abdiwelli’s and Feisal’s arrest could have been linked to a demonstration in August 2014 during which some youth in Mandera, including Abdiwelli and Feisal, protested a plan to transfer Omar Yusuf Mohamed, a young man who had been arrested on suspicion of links to Al-Shabab, from Mandera Police Station to Nairobi (see details of his case below).[73]The crackdown happened just days before Omar Yusuf went missing after being arrested by people believed to be security officers.

A resident of Mandera explained that during the protests:

Youth were demanding that, rather than be ferried to Nairobi where they feared he would likely be disappeared, Omar Yusuf be taken to court and tried. The protests only delayed the plan to transfer Omar Yusuf to Nairobi for a day as the military and police battled protesters. He was however transferred the next day after protests had been quelled, and was released after 20 days.[74]

Relatives have not seen or heard from Abdiwelli and Feisal since March 2015. Although the matter was reported at Mandera police station and police issued an occurrence book (OB) number, 40/21/4/2015,[75] there has been no follow up from the police. The commander of Mandera police station told the families two days later that Abdiwelli and Feisal were being held by the military over links with Al-Shabab and there was nothing he could do. Subsequently, officers at Mandera military camp denied knowledge of their whereabouts, referring relatives back to the police. “They simply said it is the police who arrest people, not the military, and we should ask the police,” said one family member. “They threatened to shoot us if we went back.”[76]

Omar Yusuf Mohamed

Omar Yusuf Mohamed was arrested at Baquli restaurant in Mandera town on April 26, 2015 by several non-uniformed security officers. Witnesses recognized three officers attached to CID and ATPU among those carrying out the arrest.[77]

According to a neighbor, Omar had stopped by Baquli restaurant when he received a call from someone who wanted to know where he was and Omar told him.[78]Witnesses said that, shortly after the call, a white Toyota Probox car pulled up at the restaurant and its passengers, called for Omar to come to them. One man said he overheard the conversation:

They told Omar that they wanted to ask him questions related to national security after which they would set him free. They did not introduce themselves but they are well known CID officers so Omar did not ask them to identify themselves. That was the last time we saw him.[79]

Since April 26, 2015 Omar’s family and friends have gone to countless government offices, police stations, military camps in the northeastern region and to court in Nairobi in an unsuccessful attempt to either trace him or compel police to produce him.

As one witness said:

We went to Mandera police station to report about Omar’s arrest. We told them that he was arrested by CID officers but the police insisted that maybe Omar had crossed the border to Somalia. They refused to record it in the OB as an arrest but instead recorded it as a missing person under OB number 29/05/05/2015.[80]

The relatives sought recourse in the courts, filing a habeas corpus petition. In the court records seen by Human Rights Watch, the commander of Mandera police station submitted a sworn affidavit denying arresting Omar, denying knowledge of his whereabouts or knowledge of anyone who had disappeared in the commander’s jurisdiction.[81]

The court directed the military to respond to the petition but the military also denied holding Omar or having any knowledge of his whereabouts. The hearing of the case has been postponed three times and at time of writing had yet to occur amid reports of witness intimidation.[82]

A report of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) found that the CID officers who arrested Omar had threatened witnesses who ultimately went into hiding.[83] The KNCHR also reported that police and military officers threatened Omar’s family and that they are now reluctant to continue with the case.[84]

At time of writing, those who witnessed his arrest were withdrawing from testifying after they reportedly received death threats.[85]One man who was with Omar in the restaurant on the day of the arrest told Human Rights Watch, “A day after I had been contacted to testify, I received an anonymous call warning me to keep off the case if I wanted to be alive. I decided not to testify.”[86]

Omar had previously been arrested by Kenya’s ATPU officers in August 2014 after being suspected of links with Al-Shabab and reportedly held at the ATPU offices in Upper Hill, Nairobi, for 20 days and released without charge. The authorities suspected that Omar, who at the time of his arrest worked with Makkah bus company, had been approached to help transport Al-Shabab militants to Nairobi, but later said he was not involved and released him.[87]

A relative told Human Rights Watch that when Omar was released, family members had wanted to file a case against the state for wrongful arrest and detention but ATPU officers discouraged them from doing so. “The ATPU said they had cleared Omar of any wrongdoing and he was therefore innocent,” the relative said. “They told us there was no need to file a case, as this would only complicate matters. Knowing what is going on in Mandera, we decided not to pursue the matter.”[88]

Mohamed Mohamud Musa

Mohamed, a money changer at the Kenya-Somali border in Mandera, was arrested at around 10 a.m. on April 9, 2015. A 52-year-old witness told Human Rights Watch that Mohamed and colleagues were in the Suqa Sarifka area of Mandera town waiting for customers when a vehicle with an AP insignia pulled up near them. Three male passengers who introduced themselves as police officers accused Mohamed of working for Al-Shabab. The three men confiscated his money, arrested him, took him to the vehicle and blindfolded him.[89]

Mohamed was first taken to a place where a former co-detainee said they could hear dogs barking and that it felt more like a makeshift camp or a forest.[90]They described sitting under a tree during their time in custody. It was there, according to someone who was with him in detention, that the three arresting officers who were in an AP vehicle, introduced themselves as ATPU police officers and told Mohamed he would be flown to Nairobi for questioning.[91]

Later the same day, more officers joined the team in the interrogation. Interrogators wanted to know how often Mohamed traveled to Nairobi, if he supported Al-Shabab with money, and whether the identities of his money-changing clients at the border were known to him.[92]

Several officers eventually forced Mohamed to lie down on his stomach and started kicking him.[93] He was later transferred to Mandera military camp where the beatings continued. One person said some of the participants in the beatings may have been military officers.[94]

Later that evening, the officers returned Mohamed’s money to one of his fellow money-changers at the Mandera border with Somalia. The officers told them that the money should be returned to Mohamed’s family because “Mohamed will never be seen again.”[95]His whereabouts at time of writing remained unknown.

The Garissa cases

Mahat Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed, Rahma Ali and Anab Abdullahi

On the evening of April 20, 2015, more than 20 non-uniformed men armed with pistols raided a residential compound in Taqwa neighborhood of Garissa town. Shortly after, around 50 uniformed security officers scaled the compound’s walls and forced their way into houses, arresting Mahat Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed, Rahma Ali, and Anab Abdullahi, and beating others with sticks and gun butts.

The neighbors who witnessed the arrest described the second team as wearing jungle green uniforms usually associated with the KDF, and wielding sub-machine guns.[96]

Security officers held guns to peoples’ heads, and blindfolded two women who were in the house. The security officers threatened to kill them all if they did not reveal the location of Al-Shabab fighters.[97] At least two residents were arrested from the compound and later released after being beaten and threatened. A witness told Human Rights Watch that some people might have been targeted for arrest after they telephoned individuals whose cellphones were being monitored by security officers over links with Al-Shabab.[98]

Some of the relatives and neighbors Human Rights Watch interviewed said that police officers at Garissa police station were reluctant to take our statements. A 37-year-old mother of two and relative of one of the missing said:

We could not understand why the police officers were reluctant to take our statements. In the end, we just informed them of what had happened but no one was willing to take a statement from us.[99]

A 56-year-old village elder told Human Rights Watch that local human rights organizations, witnesses and relatives to the victims who had initially attempted to trace those who had been arrested and pursue the matter with police had been threatened by anonymous callers and now no one wanted to be involved.[100] Mahat Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed, Rahma Ali, and Anab Abdullahi have not been seen since their arrest.

Hassan Abdullahi Adan, Yusuf Abdi Iman and three others

On March 26, 2015, two armored personnel carriers (APCs) full of men in camouflage uniforms suspected to be Kenyan soldiers pulled up at the Durdur restaurant in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood at around 9:30 a.m. One witness said that the armored personnel carriers had insignia of the African Union Mission in Somalia, but Human Rights Watch was not able to further corroborate this.[101] The uniformed men jumped out and started firing at people inside the restaurant, injuring three and killing two people,[102] prompting a stampede.[103]

At least three people who witnessed the shooting told Human Rights Watch that initially Hassan Abdullahi, who was a customer, Yusuf Abdi who was a restaurant employee, as well as Mohamed Geni, the restaurant owner, and Keynan, a waiter – both identified only by one name – may have been injured in the shooting but soon after the shootings saw the suspected soldiers take them away in the APCs. A 50-year-old businessman in Garissa who was present that day said:

The officers carried the five men and threw them in the Land Cruiser-like vehicles that had AMISOM insignia and drove away. We later came to understand from various accounts of those who spotted the vehicles on the road, [that they were moving] in the direction of Somalia.[104]

Relatives of the victims and witnesses to the raid recounted their frustrations searching for the missing men and trying to obtain information from the Kenyan police. Although relatives and witnesses said they reported the incident to Garissa police station several times, multiple people Human Rights Watch spoke to said that police have not investigated or supported the families’ efforts to find their relatives.[105]

As in other cases investigated by Human Rights Watch, two witnesses said there had been anonymous intimidation and threats against relatives, witnesses, human rights defenders and, in some cases, police officers, who attempted to follow up on the missing men.[106]

A 25-year-old witness who is a relative of one of the victims said:

Police at Garissa police station have never helped us and I don’t think they care. They told us that on that day they also heard gunshots but they denied knowledge of what had happened. The Garissa county commissioner told us he knew nothing about what had happened but he was clearly not willing to help find out. A National Intelligence Service officer told us that he had tried to call police on phone after he heard gunshots to inquire what was happening. Within minutes, he received a call from a concealed line ordering him to vacate the area and never talk about the issue again.[107]

Mohamed Farah Muhumed, Siad Mahat Ahmed and Sugu Apkea

In February 2014, at around 9:30 p.m., more than 10 armed Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) rangers in a Toyota Land Cruiser with KWS insignia arrested Siad Mahat Ahmed, Sugu Apkea and Mohamed Farah Muhumed from their houses in Garissa’s Bula Tawakal neighborhood. A witness said that the wildlife police went to arrest Siad Mahat Ahmed in his house and that Siad, who was accommodating Sugu Apkea as his guest, cried out for help. Ahmed Farah Muhumed, a nearby neighbor, went to Siad’s home.

A 32-year-old who witnessed the incident that night told Human Rights Watch, “The officers were heavily armed. The three men were beaten by the officers, who blindfolded them and took them to the waiting Land Cruiser. We have never seen them since that night.”[108]

Witnesses said they reported the incident to officers at Garissa police station but that the officers did not take any statements from them. A 27-year-old relative of one of the disappeared men said, “We have given up looking for them. We doubt they are still alive. It is heartbreaking because police have not been interested in investigating the matter.”[109]

In a letter to Human Rights Watch, KWS director general, Kitili Mbathi, said KWS had no knowledge of the alleged disappearance of the three men and denied that KWS was involved in any alleged disappearances country-wide.

Human Rights Watch heard other accounts of enforced disappearances implicating Kenya Wildlife Service rangers in Garissa, particularly in Danyere, Damajaley, Dadaab and Mbalambala, but did not include them in this report for lack of sufficient corroborating evidence. Those cases, however, did fit patterns of abuses documented in this report.[110]

Nairobi case

Abdifatah Odowa Adan

In May 2014, Abdifatah and some friends were at Kilimanjaro Hotel in Eastleigh, Nairobi, having tea when he received an anonymous call asking him to immediately meet a group of people outside.[111]A 20-year-old witness who was with Abdifatah told Human Rights Watch that when he and his friends, including Abdifatah went out of the hotel, they were confronted by three men in civilian clothes in a white car that turned out to be a taxicab the men had rented:

The people asked him to get into the cab but he declined and demanded that they introduce themselves. They showed their service IDs and they turned out to be officers attached to the National Intelligence Service. That was when he agreed to get into the car, thinking that these were genuine officers who would follow the law. Now we know that there is no law here.[112]

Abdifatah was a manager with E-Coach Bus service that plied the Garissa-Nairobi route, and witnesses said police may have suspected him of helping to transport Al-Shabab militants to Nairobi. Some of the friends who were with him at the hotel told Human Rights Watch that some of them wanted to get into the cab along with Abdifatah but the officers declined, saying that Abdifatah was wanted for interrogation at Pangani Police station and they could trace him at the station.[113]

One of the friends told Human Rights Watch:

Some of us looked for a different cab and drove to Pangani police station. We found neither Abdifatah nor the officers there. We looked for the taxi driver, since we had taken the registration numbers of the car. The cab driver later told us that, along the way to Pangani, the officers switched into a different car and drove away with Abdifatah. They then ordered the cab driver to proceed to Pangani police station without them.[114]

Relatives reported the incident at Pangani station, but the officers there denied involvement or knowledge of the arrest. The relatives filed a habeas corpus claim in Nairobi but the police and the ministry of interior and national coordination denied knowledge of Abdifatah’s whereabouts.[115]

Later in May 2015, the Member of Parliament for Ijara, Ahmed Ibrahim Abbas, filed a motion in parliament demanding that government disclose Abdifatah’s whereabouts. The office of the Inspector General of Police and Cabinet Secretary for Interior and National coordination denied any knowledge.[116]“We are now stuck. They arrest and deny they have him, but they do nothing to find him,” said one of the young men, also a relative, who was with him at the time he was taken.[117]

The Wajir cases

Ali Duale Keynan

Five security officers in plain clothes arrested Ali Duale, a young madrasa teacher, from a cyber café in the Wagbare area of Wajir town on April 14, 2015.[118]A witness said that the five were driving two vehicles, a white Toyota Hilux Pickup with no registration number plates, generally known in Wajir town to be used by RBPU officers, and a white Toyota Land Cruiser, also without registration number plates but generally known to be used by the ATPU.[119]

A 51-year-old relative told Human Rights Watch:

The officers raided the cyber café and started firing in the air, causing a stampede. Ali Duale was inside and started running like all the others. The officers pursued, arrested and forced him to sit down. One of the officers just shot him in the right knee even though he was already seated.[120]

Two people who were there that day told Human Rights Watch that one of the arresting officers was a senior superintendent of police attached to the Rapid Deployment Unit, a unit within the Administration Police.[121]The officers immediately blindfolded Ali Duale and took him away, but they neither recorded him as a detainee in Wajir police station nor booked him into the OB as required by law.[122]

While addressing the media the next day, then-Wajir county commissioner Fredrick Shisia admitted that Ali Duale was in the custody of government security agencies but failed to state where he was being held or by which unit.[123]The state-funded KNCHR reported that the Wajir county commissioner had informed the family that Ali Duale was in the custody of the government.[124]Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that, once the commissioner admitted publicly that Ali Duale was in custody of the state, the matter stalled for over a year and the family has not been able to establish his whereabouts since then.[125]

Hussein Ali Abdullahi

Security officers in plain clothes driving a black truck with the Government of Kenya insignia arrested Hussein Ali Abdullahi from his shop in Wajir town next to Wajir market on May 8, 2015. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that four days prior to his arrest, Border Patrol Unit police officers had arrested both his wife, Ebla Abdullahi Abdirahman, and his brother, Afey Ali Abdullahi. The officers had directed the two to “produce” Hussein Ali Abdullahi and, when they could not, they immediately arrested them.[126]

Police took Hussein’s wife and brother to Wajir police station where they were held together for three days. On May 8, the day Hussein Ali was arrested, his brother was transferred to Wajir military camp and his wife was released.

A 43-year-old male witness told Human Rights Watch:

The officers photographed Afey, blindfolded him and then moved him to Wajir military camp before releasing Hussein’s wife. It was only when Hussein’s wife returned home that she was told by neighbors that her husband had just been arrested by the Border Patrol Unit.[127]

The police Border Patrol officers, according to witnesses privy to what transpired, took Hussein Ali directly to Wajir military camp where, in the first five days of his arrest, he was held together with his brother, Afey Ali Abdullahi, who was later released. The two were blindfolded and could not see each other, but could talk during meals. Soldiers removed Hussein Abdullahi Ali from Wajir military camp two days after his arrest, according to his brother, but it is not known where he was taken. He has not been seen since.

 

Ali Warsame

Kenya Police Reservists (KPR) whom multiple witnesses in Wajir town recognized arrested Ali Warsame at Urale market, in Wajir town, at 8 a.m. on April 9, 2015.They handed him over to a commander of the Rapid Deployment Unit (RDU) in Wajir. The RDU commander and the KDF officers were waiting at the County Commissioner’s office from where they immediately drove way with Ali Warsame in a Toyota Land Cruiser that had RDU insignia. A human rights activist who was near Wajir Police station told Human Rights Watch that he later saw the same vehicle head towards Wajir military camp.

The activist who witnessed the arrest told Human Rights Watch that the KPR officers wrapped traditional Somali kikoi cloth around Ali Warsame, and forcefully dragged him and another man whose name is given only as Hassan to the compound of the then county commissioner. A KDF officer then ordered the two men who had been arrested to lie down outside the compound. The witness said: “They used Ali Warsame’s turban to blindfold him while Hassan was blindfolded with his shirt.”[128]The whereabouts of Ali Warsame, whose arrest was neither reported nor recorded in the OB by the arresting officers, remain unknown.

Torture, inhuman and degrading treatment

Human Rights Watch documented six cases of serious abuse of detainees that appeared to amount to torture in the military camps and bases in Garissa, Wajir and Mandera. Torture is defined in the Convention against Torture as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining information or a confession, or as punishment. The actual number of torture victims in the region could be much higher because several other people who Human Rights Watch had reasons to suspect were victims of torture declined to be interviewed because of fear of reprisals.[129]

In mid-May 2015, ATPU officers arrested a 47-year-old man from the outskirts of Garissa town and detained him for four months.[130] Human Rights Watch observed visible signs of physical abuse, including scars, on his back, but he declined to be interviewed.[131]A relative told Human Rights Watch that the man, who could not describe where he had been held because he was blindfolded non-stop for four months, still had difficulty with his eyesight.[132]The relative said, “We don’t have money to pay for his healthcare but we know that if he doesn’t get medical attention soon, he might lose his eyesight.”[133]

The relative said that the man thought he was being held in Nairobi because the officers had told him and the other people he was being held with that they were there, but the inmates could not see each other or confirm their location due to being blindfolded.[134]

In Wajir, a 48-year-old man, a Quranic teacher, was arrested on April 1, 2015 by officers who were looking for his brother and detained for 15 days in Wajir military camp. The man told Human Rights Watch that the military officers continuously beat him with gun butts and whips.[135]

The man said he had first been detained for two nights at Wajir Police station without being registered into OB and then handed over to the military. The man said that, at the military camp, the military officers repeatedly shocked him with electricity, and injected him with unknown substances (Human Rights Watch saw marks on his back, chest, hands and legs). When Human Rights Watch visited the man in October 2015, the whip marks on his thighs, ribs, head, back and head had not healed.[136]He said that all the toenails on his left foot had been removed and his artificial leg had been broken by the military officers during his detention.[137]

The man said:

It was not an ordinary whip they were beating me with. It would penetrate my flesh and I would feel a lot of pain. They hit my head until I fainted. They took away my artificial limb and removed all the toenails from my other leg. They hit my head with gun butts and I bled profusely for three consecutive days until I fainted. They would also force injections into my body. I don’t know what they were injecting me with. At some point, my condition was so bad that they brought in a doctor. After the doctor treated me they took me away and started beating me again.[138]

After 15 days, the man’s condition was so bad that he could not walk on his own when the military officers left him inside Wajir police station. During the interrogation, the military officers asked him about the location of Al-Shabab fighters, where guns are being hidden and the whereabouts of his brother, who Kenyan security was yet to locate.

A relative told Human Rights Watch that the man looked like he would die. The relative recounted: “Some people thought he was already dead, with his motionless body lying outside the station. When a crowd that thought he was already dead started gathering at the station, the officer in charge of Wajir police station ordered him to immediately begin to walk back home. A well-wisher volunteered to take him back on a personal motor bike.”[139]

In Mandera, a 41-year-old man told Human Rights Watch he was arrested by KDF officers on April 22, 2015 and taken to Mandera military camp where he was tortured continuously for two days.[140]The man, who was being detained together with a 28 year-old man, said the military officers applied electric shocks, submerged them in hot and cold water, and beat them to try and force them to confess to being Al-Shabab members.[141]

A 55-year-old man privy to what went on inside the military camp told Human Rights Watch:

They had just been held for two days but their condition was bad. They had been given electric shocks several times, beaten with sticks, gun butts and whips and kicked in the ribs. They were being made to sit on electric coils placed inside cold and hot water. They had to alternate between sittings on the coils inserted in cold water for a while before being taken to coils inside hot water. This has totally destroyed their manhood.[142]

IV. Suspected cases of extrajudicial killings

Police did not even visit the family when his body was discovered miles away. In any case, there are many families with such cases and police have done nothing. Death is the order of the day here.

-Human rights defender in Mandera, December 8, 2015.

Human Rights Watch documented 11 cases in which bodies found in shallow graves, mortuaries or dumped in various locations in Kenya were ultimately determined to be individuals last seen in with Kenyan security officers. These cases raise serious concerns that at least in some instances, those who have been arrested and reported missing or feared disappeared have been killed while in custody. Among the 11 cases, four people were last seen in the custody of the KDF and seven were last seen being arrested or detained by various units of the Kenyan police.

In 2015, allegations of new graves in Garissa, Wajir and Mandera began to emerge in the media.[143] Some suggested that the graves could contain the remains of the disappeared – those who had been reported as missing at various police stations throughout the region.[144] In May 2015, the local media, community elders and human rights activists in Garissa county reported six bodies found in a suspected mass grave in Modica forest, nearly 10 kilometers from Garissa town, and two other mass graves in Lanbib, Wajir county, one with 11 bodies and another with seven bodies.[145] In December 2015, similar allegations surfaced in Mandera after a woman’s body was discovered in a shallow grave in the bushes of Arabia location, off Mandera-Wajir road.[146]

Each time, Kenya’s government and security officials denied responsibility for the deaths, and failed to conduct meaningful investigations.[147] In some cases, families traced, identified, and recovered the bodies of their relatives, largely without the assistance of the police, and buried them.

In several instances, Kenyan police did not secure sites of suspected mass graves and communities were often unsure about the identities of the bodies found. As a result, important evidence has likely been lost. Exhumations without forensic experts can destroy critical evidence and greatly complicate determining the cause of death and identification of bodies.[148]

Police and the military appear to obstruct investigations, particularly in Mandera, by bringing dead bodies to the mortuary but refusing to record the name of the officers or to share information with mortuary officials, such as exactly where the body was found. For example, in December 2015, Human Rights Watch examined mortuary records in Mandera general hospital and counted reports of at least six bodies – not among the cases documented in this report – all without an officer’s name, a cause of death or any indication of where the body was found. Of the six bodies, one had been brought into the Mandera mortuary by uniformed KDF officers, suspected to be from the Mandera military base, but no name of any of the officers is recorded.[149] A staff member at Mandera general hospital told Human Rights Watch that security officers frequently checked bodies into the mortuary without signing their names as is required under the law.[150]He also said that KDF officers have twice assaulted the mortuary attendant and threatened to shoot hospital staff who attempted to insist that officers sign their names in the registry when they dropped off dead bodies.[151]

Witnesses in the 11 cases documented by Human Rights Watch said that police failed to secure the location where bodies had been unearthed or to collect material evidence from the scene, or to ensure there was an autopsy in order to determine the actual cause of death, as required under Kenyan law.[152]

In few cases where bodies of the dead have been identified, the great distances between where people were arrested and where their bodies are ultimately found, means that those whose loved ones are missing have difficulties tracing them. For example, one body of someone arrested in Garissa county was found in Thika town 320 kilometers away.[153] The body of another person also arrested in Garissa was found in the outskirts of Embu town, also more than 300 kilometers away.[154]One person was found in a shallow grave nearly 50 kilometers from Mandera town he had been last seen. Another body was discovered in an area called Fino, nearly 90kms from Mandera County where the victim had been arrested.[155]

Kenyan authorities have in some instances suggested that the victims were killed by Al-Shabab.[156] But locations where the bodies were found show that the perpetrators traveled to the interior of Kenya to dispose of the bodies, rather than move in the direction of the Kenya-Somalia border. By moving toward the interior and closer to the capital, Nairobi, the perpetrators would have gone through the numerous police check points – more than 15 check points between Garissa and Thika town alone – without being detected transporting a corpse.[157]Given the intensity of the presence of security forces, this seems very unlikely.

In the 11 named cases documented by Human Rights Watch, Kenyan authorities failed to ensure that, where necessary, inquests were held to establish the circumstances under which the victims died despite media reports and concerns expressed by families and human rights organizations, as well as widespread calls by local leaders to government to ensure accountability for those responsible for the killings. Human Rights Watch is not aware of any investigations into the causes of these deaths or anyone arrested as an alleged perpetrator of these deaths, leaving victims’ families without answers. Human Rights Watch did not receive any response to letters sent to government authorities asking questions regarding the status of any investigations.

Cases from Mandera

Abdiwahab Noor Abdi Diis

On April 22, 2015, a group of uniformed masked KDF officers arrested Noor Abdi Diis at around 10 a.m. from his retail shop in Omar Jillo, about 40 kilometers from Mandera town along Mandera-Nairobi road. The KDF officers drove an armored personnel carrier and a military tanker.[158]

Noor Abdi Diis was arrested along with five other people, also from Omar Jillo, witnesses said, but the identities of the five were not known.[159]Community members in Fino later discovered Noor Diis’s body on April 27, 2015, close to 50 kilometers from where he was arrested. But witnesses said the whereabouts of the other five people who were arrested with him have remained unknown.[160]

A 68-year-old man who witnessed the arrests and was also among those who went to Fino to try and identify the body said:

When people received reports that a body had been discovered in Fino area, the families of all the victims who had been arrested with Noor Diis went there to check and see whether it was that of their relative. We found it was Noor Diis because he had a photocopy of the Kenya national identity card in one of his trouser pockets. His wife, mother and brother also identified physical marks on him.[161]

A man who was involved in searching for Noor Diis told Human Rights Watch that Noor had three bullet wounds in his head and one bullet in each shoulder, all shot from behind.[162]Community members reported the discovery of Noor Diis’ body to Fino Police Station and officers from the station visited the scene, saw the body and left. The officers did not secure the scene, gather any evidence or carry out any investigations.[163]

An elder who accompanied the family in most cases during the search said:

We accompanied the family to the station with the hope of reporting the matter and recording a statement, but police refused to take our report or even give us the OB number for the case. They also refused to come and collect the body. We just collected the body ourselves and went and helped the family to bury it in Arabia area, which is where his mother lives.[164]

Isnina Musa Sheikh

Four masked men in plainclothes arrested Isnina at around 1 p.m. on December 3, 2015 as she served customers at her food kiosk in Mandera town. The men failed to identify themselves but were carrying pistols and M16 assault rifles, commonly used by KDF officers. Witnesses said that the four men who arrested her ordered everyone in the food kiosk to lie down, pointing their guns at some customers’ heads and threatening to shoot them.[165]

Isnina, a mother of five, was then driven away in a white Toyota Probox car driven between two Land Cruisers that had KDF insignia on the doors. On December 4, 2015, family members made a report about her arrest at Mandera police station. Herders discovered her body on December 6 in a shallow grave in Arabia, some 50 kilometers from Mandera town and later taken to Mandera hospital mortuary.[166]

Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that Isnina had previously been arrested twice, once in 2014 and also in 2015, by ATPU officers over alleged links with Al-Shabab, but she was released without charge both times.[167]

A source privy to the security operations in Mandera told Human Rights Watch that Kenyan security had monitored Isnina’s phone communications and, as far as the military intelligence and the ATPU were concerned, there was no doubt that Isnina was linked to Al-Shabab.[168] Human Rights Watch could not determine the veracity of that allegation.

The Kenyan cabinet secretary for interior and national coordination, Joseph Ole Nkaissery, denied that government security agencies could have been responsible for her death. The minister’s public statements again accused her of links with Al-Shabab, without providing evidence. Nkaissery said at a press conference: “She was a well-known Al-Shabab cook, so who knows, maybe they killed her.”[169]

According to the postmortem, seen by Human Rights Watch and conducted by a pathologist hired by a Nairobi-based non-governmental organization, the Independent Medico Legal Unit (IMLU), and witnessed by government pathologists, Isnina had been hit on the head and chest by a blunt object that caused internal bleeding.[170] The report further noted that her body had soft tissue injuries on the back, arm, head and chest consistent with torture.[171]

Abdi Bare Mohamed

On August 13, 2015, Abdi Bare Mohamed, was walking to Mandera county headquarters to seek employment with a relative when he encountered a CID officer he had met before. A relative who witnessed the encounter told Human Rights Watch that the CID officer accused Abdi of having links with Al-Shabab and demanded he pay Ksh50,000 (US$500) as protection fee or be killed. The officer, according to the relative, hit Abdi and boasted that it was just a matter of time before he would disappear. The CID officer said that when Abdi eventually goes missing, the family should call him on a telephone number, which he said was his personal line.[172]

A woman who saw the exchange between Abdi and the officer told Human Rights Watch:

Abdi pleaded with him for over 30 minutes as he was being bullied on the road. He said he was just a job seeker and could not raise Ksh50, 000 [US$ 500]. The man just laughed, snatched the envelope Abdi was carrying and scribbled the phone number he said the family should call when Abdi goes missing. When officer released the young man, his ear was bleeding and Abdi was scared.[173]

Witnesses said that Abdi was last seen on August 18, 2015 leaving his mother’s house to head to the market in Mandera.[174]Relatives reported his disappearance at Mandera police station on August 19, 2015 but this report was missing from the police records when the family wanted to refer to it a few days later.[175]

Abdi’s relatives found his body on September 5, 2015 at Mandera hospital mortuary. A witness at Mandera general hospital told Human Rights Watch that two people suspected to be security officers dropped off Abdi’s body at the mortuary that day, but refused to identify themselves.[176]

The day after Abdi’s body was discovered, the same CID officer described above called the family and directed that they report to him at the station. A witness said: “The family was scared and just could not summon the strength to go to the station. They have never gone there because they fear meeting the same fate as Abdi Bare.”[177]

A Garissa case

Abdimalik Mohamed (alias Ibrahim)

In late April 2013, 50 uniformed police officers armed with what neighbors who witnessed the raid described as HK G3 assault rifles with spotlights arrested Abdimalik from his house in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, at the end of April 2013. The officers raided the compound and searched each house in an operation that lasted nearly two hours, during which they arrested Abdimalik and his 18-year-old brother, with whom he shared a house.

A 27-year-old witness, a neighbor who was also harassed by security officers during the raid, told Human Rights Watch:

Some of them remained outside the compound but others jumped over the perimeter wall to get into the compound. They ordered everyone to lie down as they searched one house after another. They seemed to know who they were looking for. I heard a man identify Abdimalik and his brother. These were the only people they arrested from the compound that night.[178]

In the ensuing period, relatives and witness tried to search for the two brothers at police stations within Garissa but they could not find them and, according to witnesses, officers from Garissa station were not interested when they reported the disappearance there. Abdimalik’s body was found near Thika town, close to Nairobi, over 300 kilometers from Garissa town three days later.[179] Although a medical examination of the body was never conducted – as police never secured the scene or took the body for examination – and the body was barely recognizable, the family identified him using body marks.

A 43-year-old witness said:

The body was soaked in blood, the face was swollen as if he had been beaten badly and parts of his back and chest had dark depressions in the skin and wounds. One of the arms was broken while his neck had strangle marks. He had bullet wounds in the head but I don’t know how many. His shirt was torn and soaked in blood while the trouser looked like it was being pulled on the ground and was sagging yet it still had his ID inside.[180]

Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the discovery of Abdimalik’s mutilated body was reported at Thika central police station, but neither the Garissa police where his arrest was first reported nor the police in Thika recorded statements from the family. The family and relatives buried the body in Thika cemetery, in central Kenya.[181] His 18-year- old brother has never been found. The family has since moved from Garissa out of fear.

Nairobi case

Mohamud Abdi

On June 23, 2014, three men believed to be members of the police’s DCI seized Mohamud Abdi at around lunch time on 12th street in Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the three men officers in plainclothes first approached Mohamud who was walking with his two friends just near Barclays Bank, and asked for someone called Black, which was Mohamud’s nickname.[182] They then asked for Mohamud’s identity card and looked at his picture to confirm he was indeed the one they were looking for.

When Mohamud and friends demanded that the officers identify themselves, they showed cards indicating they were attached to the DCI, but they were traveling in a white taxicab.

The officers said they were taking Mohamud to Pangani Police station. Two friends who were with him during the arrest offered to accompany him to the police station but the security officers declined to share the taxicab with them, according to witnesses. A 55-year-old man told Human Rights Watch, “They told the two friends to use a different vehicle. They looked for a different vehicle and quickly followed them up to Pangani Police station but were surprised to be told by officers at Pangani station that Mohamud had not been seen there.”[183]

Human Rights Watch learned that the friends then started searching for the white taxicab, whose registration numbers they had recorded. It was only then that they realized what had happened, according to a 27-year old witnesses:

They found the cabdriver who said that the officers had switched to a new car together with Mohamud just before reaching Pangani police station and instead forced the cabdriver to continue driving to the station. We think this must have been their way of shaking off anyone who might have been following them.[184]

Relatives and friends, according to someone who was close to the family, then embarked on a rather painful process of searching for Mohamud, including, with the assistance of Pangani police, tracking his phone number. The phone could however be tracked only up to the roundabout next to Pangani police station, which meant the SIM card had been removed and the phone disabled around that area. Relatives searched for him in all public mortuaries in Nairobi, central Kenya and Machakos to the eastern region without success.

According to one witness:

On June 24, the family, accompanied by an officer from Pangani station, asked for the closed circuit television footage from the area where Mohamud was arrested but the bank declined. On June 25 the family got a court order for Barclays to release the footage, but the bank has refused to obey the court order. They have not been sanctioned for failing to comply.[185]

Another witness told Human Rights Watch that the family, in a bid to monitor his financial transactions during the period he was missing, examined his account at Kenya Commercial Bank. The witness said: “There was an ATM withdrawal of Ksh40,000 (US$ 400) from Kenya Commercial Bank, Murang’a Branch in Central Kenya on the night of June 23 and another Ksh1,800 (US$18) from KCB’s Total Branch in Nairobi on June 24.”[186]

The family eventually found Mohamud’s body at Nairobi’s city mortuary on July 17, 2014. Human Rights Watch perused the records at city mortuary and found that, in fact, Mohamud’s body was checked in on June 25, just two days after he was arrested, by two police officers, including one written in the records as “Inspector Makau.”[187]

V. Government Response

“The State cannot restrict the right to know the truth about the fate and the whereabouts of the disappeared as such restriction only adds to, and prolongs, the continuous torture inflicted upon the relatives.”

-UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, “General Comment on the Right to the Truth in Relation to Enforced Disappearance,” July 22, 2010.

Despite widespread reports by the media, local human rights organizations and local political leaders, Kenyan authorities have failed to investigate or even acknowledge the killings and disappearances in northeast. The government has routinely denied that there are cases of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings and defended the security agencies, ignoring mounting evidence of serious abuses.[188] Government officials have also criticized and verbally attacked those pushing for investigations, such as members of the media and civil society organizations.

Failure to adequately investigate

In the 45 cases documented in northeast and Nairobi by Human Rights Watch, family members or witnesses had in one way or another made reports to the police and, in some cases, had OB numbers from police stations, but in no case was there evidence that police had made efforts to investigate the incidents with the view to ensuring justice.

Other than recording the relevant OB numbers for some cases, police failed to take statements from families or relatives who took the initiative to formally report their missing or dead relatives. In two instances in Mandera, the relevant page where the case was recorded had been ripped off, forcing relatives to make fresh reports. In some of the cases, relatives told Human Rights Watch that either police had declined to take statements from them or, for lack of trust and confidence in the police, the relatives and witnesses simply did not bother to report.

A 27-year-old journalist who corresponds for an international television station from Garissa said:

We have interviewed many affected families and certainly there are those that have reported their cases to police. They complain that police are taking the reports too casually and are not keen on investigating. Other than taking note of the reports, police don’t do anything else.[189]

The journalist told Human Rights Watch that this had resulted in mistrust between police and the communities. “The only reason families keep going to report to the police,” he said, “is that those who arrest their relatives often introduce themselves as security officers.”[190]

A 38-year-old mother of three, whose husband’s dead body was found, expressed her frustrations to Human Rights Watch:

After my husband was kidnapped, we went to report the incident at Garissa police station, but police said that they did not know anything about him. When we tried to have the case taken down as that of a missing person, police declined to take the report. They did not enter it in the OB as should be the case. When we found his body, we again reported the matter to Embu police station but they did not bother. They did not even come to the scene or collect the body. We took his body and buried him and the matter ended there. We have not heard from the police since.[191]

Human Rights Watch heard similar accounts from other relatives of those who are missing or found dead. By failing to act on these reports so doing, Kenyan police deliberately either violate or ignore relevant national and international laws. The Kenya Criminal Procedure Act of 1930 requires police to, upon receiving reports of a missing or dead person, immediately proceed to the place where the body of the deceased is, investigate and prepare a report on the apparent cause of death.[192] The Act further says the report shall “describe such wounds, fractures, bruises and other marks of injury as may be found on the body, and stating in what manner, and by what weapon or instrument, the marks appear to have been inflicted; and the report shall be forwarded forthwith to the nearest magistrate empowered to hold inquests.”[193]

The relatives who did not report the incidents of missing or dead persons told Human Rights Watch that they were either afraid of being targeted themselves or did not believe they would get justice from police or any other government institution.[194] Even among those who reported, including victims of torture who had been released, Human Rights Watch heard of cases of intimidation by police and the military officials against anyone who would otherwise contemplate seeking justice.

In at least five cases, both the military and some police officers either concealed evidence, interfered with scenes of crime or intimidated potential witnesses. A 40-year-old man told Human Rights Watch about how officers at Garissa police station handled reports of the alleged enforced disappearance of his 33-year-old brother:

The management of the restaurant where my brother worked recorded a statement about the incident on the same day, but when I went to the station two days later, we could not trace the statement. Up to now no one knows where the statement went. I also decided to officially record a statement about the disappearance of my brother. My statement too has disappeared.[195]

According to Kenyan law, it is an offence for a police officer to fail to record and report any complaint and requires all complaints made against police officers to be recorded and reported to the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), a statutory civilian police oversight mechanism, for investigation and prosecution.[196]Commanders in Kenya’s north eastern region consequently have failed to record and report complaints against security officers which is a critical step to investigations to ensure accountability.

Failure to acknowledge

The government’s failure to acknowledge the abuses which have occurred in counterterrorism operations and its hostility to any allegations that members of its forces are implicated has undermined the possibility for justice for the victims and accountability for the perpetrators.

The state-funded Kenya National Commission on Human Rights released a report in September 2015 documenting 25 extrajudicial killings and 81 enforced disappearances in Kenya.[197] The Kenya Police Service spokesperson described such reports as “cheap propaganda” and suggested that those reported as missing are likely in Somalia with Al-Shabab.[198] He argued that those making such claims are Al-Shabab agents who want security agencies to ease off, so that Al-Shabab can continue killing civilians in Kenya.[199]

Charles Owino, the police spokesperson, said:

What surprises me is that the government agents and the general public that are getting killed seem not to have rights in the eyes of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights. The government has all the machinery. It is not real (sic) that people would be killed in a military camp and then buried behind the camp in a shallow grave. If truly the military has killed, they have the capacity to hide you somewhere that is not a shallow grave.[200]

President Uhuru Kenyatta and the National Security Council, in response to an Al Jazeera investigative story on December 7, 2014, which quoted Kenyan security officers as saying that the order to kill and disappear people comes from the National Security Council, flatly denied any possibility that Kenyan security agencies could be implicated.[201]

In November 2015, while responding to a report by a Kenyan non-governmental human rights organization about the conduct of KDF officers in Somalia, the president again defended Kenyan security agencies and denied the claims against them.

Kenyatta said:

Instead of commending our security forces who are making major sacrifices to defend and guard the country against terrorists, some Kenyan leaders are discouraging them by supporting the misplaced allegations. We will stand firm with our security agents because we know the important role they play in keeping our country safe. That is why we insist that our military and other Kenyan security agents must be give room to carry out their work without political interference.[202]

Threats to families, witnesses, media and human rights campaigners

Government officials and security officials have threatened and intimidated those seeking to report disappearances and other abuses, witnesses, local political leaders and human rights organizations calling for investigations and accountability for abuses occurring in the context of Kenya’s counterterrorism operations. Journalists and media houses reporting on killings and enforced disappearances in response to attacks in the country have also faced threats.

In December 2015, the cabinet secretary for interior and national coordination, Joseph Nkaissery, threatened to arrest anyone linking the military and other security agencies to killings, enforced disappearances and the purported mass graves in the northeastern region.[203] He also reprimanded a well-regarded Kenyan investigative journalist, Mohamed Ali, for his coverage of abuses in the northeastern region.[204]

Nkaissery warned:

Anybody who makes allegations must provide proof or else he or she will face dire consequences. This young man called Mohamed Ali has a habit of permanently putting the interests of the security organs of this country behind those of Al-Shabab. He has been portraying the Kenyan security in the negative and Al-Shabab in the positive. He shows Al-Shabab training and our people in the opposite. Kenyans should know that there are numerous interests that seem inclined to destroy the nation.[205]

On December 10, 2015, just a day after that warning by Nkaissery, four political leaders from northeastern Kenya, including Mandera Senator Billow Kerrow, were arrested and released without charge over claims they had made regarding the existence of mass graves in Mandera.[206] Other than the shallow grave in which the body of Isnina Musa Sheikh was found 50 kilometers from Mandera town, a search team of security officers, human rights activists, local leaders, villagers and the media found no bodies in the seven sites marked as potential locations for mass graves.[207] The Kenyan authorities, which have not adequately investigated other claims of mass graves in northeastern region, blamed local leaders for spreading what authorities argue are false reports of mass graves. Kenyan media reported that the leaders who were arrested were questioned on incitement to violence and giving false information.[208]

In November 2014, following the investigative documentary by Al Jazeera, Kenyan authorities ordered an investigation into Al Jazeera but never investigated the actual allegations.[209] The ministry of interior and national coordination accused the makers of the documentary of supporting Al-Shabab and “terrorism.” Monica Juma, the principal secretary for interior and national coordination, said in a statement:

The timing of the documentary is suspicious and appears meant to derail Kenya’s efforts to fight terrorism. The tone and subjective nature of the documentary was deliberately skewed to support and empathize with terrorists and their sympathizers without any consideration for the hundreds of innocent Kenyans who have died in the hands of terrorists.[210]

The practice of public officials threatening victims of abuse and families of the victims who seek justice, intimidating human rights activists and exerting pressure on the media reporting on the abuses appears to be replicated by security officials across the country.

As previously indicated, all the 45 cases of disappearances and deaths documented in this report were reported in one way or another to police stations within their jurisdictions as required under law. But in 30 cases, the families said they had ultimately opted not to actively pursue justice beyond the initial report. More than half cited fear of reprisals by Kenyan security agents as the reason for not pursuing justice, with six of the 30 saying they had been turned away from police stations.[211]Ten families said they did not trust the Kenyan police to investigate and prosecute the cases well.[212]

The 15 families who reported cases to police and decided to actively pursue the cases said they had been either intimidated or threatened with death by Kenyan security officers.[213] Many families had stopped pursuing the cases altogether. None of the victims of torture and ill treatment had attempted to pursue justice out of fear, and nearly all of them saying they had been warned of dire consequences if they either sought justice or revealed what had happened to them.[214]

VI. In Pursuit of Justice

Kenya’s accountability institutions and framework have failed to stem the ongoing human rights abuses by the security forces deployed in response to Al-Shabab attacks in the country.[215]One key obstacle is the entrenched lack of political will to support or respect the work of Kenya’s accountability institutions, established specifically to respond to allegations of abuses by security forces.[216]Without significant and clear commitment from all branches of the Kenyan government, and persistent support specifically for accountability from key donors to the security sector, abuses such as those documented in this report are very likely to continue.

The evidence of the impunity problem in Kenya is overwhelming. Many groups including Human Rights Watch, other international and Kenyan human rights organizations, government institutions such as the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, and the media have documented torture, disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and arbitrary arrests among other violations, during counterterrorism law enforcement operations for years.[217]Despite the avalanche of reports, Kenyan authorities have rarely investigated security forces for their conduct. Human Rights Watch is unaware of a single conviction of any member of the Kenyan security forces for a human rights abuse in the context of counterterrorism operations.

Security sector reforms as envisaged under the 2010 Constitution and the accompanying laws were partly meant to help address the long-standing accountability challenges of the security forces, especially the police.[218] Consequently, the National Police Service Act, the National Police Service Commission Act and Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) Act, alongside the Constitution itself, have elaborate provisions on procedures and accountability requirements for the police. Laws establishing the Kenya Defense Forces and the Kenya Wildlife Services do not have adequate accountability requirements.[219] It is not clear, for example, to whom or where relatives and victims of KDF and KWS abuses/violations would report complaints or how such complaints would be investigated.

Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA)

IPOA, the civilian police accountability mechanism, was specifically founded in 2012 to address and improve accountability in the police force. IPOA is mandated to hold the police accountable to the public and to ensure independent oversight of complaints. According to the law establishing IPOA, it can “investigate any complaints related to disciplinary or criminal offences committed by any member of the Service, whether on its own motion or on receipt of a complaint, and make recommendations to the relevant authorities, including recommendations for prosecution, compensation, internal disciplinary action or any other appropriate relief, and shall make public the response received to these recommendations.” It can also “monitor and investigate police operations affecting the public.”[220]

IPOA has received 4,075 complaints of police abuse across the country since it started operations in 2013. It has successfully prosecuted only 10 cases in the past three years, despite initiating at least 19 investigations against the police at the coast, in the northeast, Nyanza and Nairobi.[221] For example, following Usalama Watch, an IPOA investigation identified at least 29 cases of abuses by police officers during operations.[222]This was probably a conservative figure,[223]but nonetheless, there is so far no evidence that any of the officers implicated in the IPOA report has been held to account, either through an internal police process or through courts of law.

On several occasions, police, politicians allied to the ruling party and senior government officials have publicly called for the disbandment of IPOA when it has attempted to investigate police abuses.[224] With regard to abuses in counterterrorism operations, for example, Human Rights Watch learned that IPOA had investigated at least five cases in northeastern Kenya and found sufficient evidence to recommend prosecutions, but the oversight body has yet to take any measures to ensure justice with regard to the cases. The government has also proposed amendments to increase the powers of the executive in the appointment of the top officials and board of IPOA.[225] The amendments have been criticized by, among others, the Law Society of Kenya, as an attempt to strip the authority of independence and essentially weaken the oversight mechanism.[226]

Rather than investigate, Kenyan government officials have denied that the abuses occur or that security forces could be involved.[227]The authorities demonize those who express concerns, branding them as being sympathetic to “terrorism,”[228] while at the same time reducing budgetary support to accountability institutions such as KNCHR and IPOA and weakening the legislation that could enable the institutions to investigate the allegations and bring evidence to light.[229]These institutions should have the opportunity to carry out their mandates free of interference or intimidation to be effective.

The Case for a Special Commission of Inquiry

The government, and in particular President Kenyatta, should change course and ensure accountability for abuses like those documented in this report. One significant step forward would be for him to establish a new mechanism specifically to examine abuses in counterterrorism operations, alongside publicly pushing for criminal investigations of officers who are alleged to have been involved in abuses.

The Commissions of Inquiry Act allows the president to appoint a special commission to “inquire into the conduct of any public officer or the conduct or management of any public body, or into any matter into which an inquiry would, in the opinion of the President, be in the public interest.”[230] A special commission of inquiry, whether judicial and/or parliamentary, and if well-supported and free of political manipulation, could respond to the pressing national challenge of addressing the root causes of Kenya’s impunity gap. Kenyan law allows parliament to institute its own inquiry through a parliamentary commission, which is an option Kenyan legislators should pursue if the president fails to commission an independent inquiry.

As multiple government agencies and units are increasingly working together in counterterrorism operations, handing over suspects to one another, and detaining suspects arrested by various units, a commission of inquiry with a broad mandate to investigate the actions of multiple agencies is critical. Currently, there is no government accountability mechanism which has a mandate to investigate the actions of all security organs, including the military and the wildlife service. As stated previously, those seeking information from the KDF, for example, regarding the whereabouts of detainees believed to be held in military compounds, have no clear avenues for asking even basic questions.

IPOA’s mandate is limited to police and therefore the institution can do nothing in the face of allegations of KDF abuses. There is also no organization or mechanism with mandate and sufficient clout to routinely visit and investigate reports of illegal detention facilities inside military compounds or barracks. There are also real questions about IPOA’s capacity to handle proper investigations given the geographic range of allegations against police and the complexity of police’s involvement with the military in the context of counterterrorism operations specifically.

To ensure independence and credibility of its findings, the commission should draw its membership from multiple agencies, sectors and expertise. It should also have powers to summon commanders and officers from any agencies, including the police, military and the KWS, and any government office. Senior government leadership including the president and cabinet ministers should insist on compliance with the Commission’s summons.[231] The Commission’s findings should be made public to the greatest extent possible, and handed over to a judicial authority to pursue possible prosecutions.

VII. Kenya Government’s Legal Obligations

International Legal Obligations

The government’s failure to act decisively against human rights abuses in the northeast violates its international legal obligations. International human rights law obligates governments to end impunity for serious human rights violations by undertaking prompt, thorough, and impartial investigations of alleged human rights violations, ensuring that those responsible for serious crimes are prosecuted, tried, and duly punished.[232]

International treaties that Kenya is party to obligate the government to deter and prevent gross violations of human rights, and to investigate, prosecute, and remedy abuses.[233]This also entails addressing the victim's rights to justice, knowledge, and reparations.[234]

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) requires that governments adopt measures, including through the legal system, to protect fundamental rights.[235]According to the UN Human Rights Committee, the independent expert body that monitors compliance with the ICCPR, a state’s failure to investigate and bring perpetrators to justice, particularly with respect to crimes such as killings, torture and other ill-treatment, is in itself a violation of the covenant.[236]

Further, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights obligates states to ensure protection of rights enshrined in the charter, and for individuals to have rights violations against them heard by competent national institutions.[237] Various international standards also seek to promote state efforts to obtain justice for victims. For instance, the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extralegal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions call upon governments to remove officials implicated in such crimes from direct or indirect power over the complainants, witnesses and those conducting the investigation.[238]

Identification of the specific perpetrators of the violations is crucial in ensuring accountability. The doctrine of superior or command responsibility imposes liability on superiors for the unlawful acts of their subordinates, where the superior knew or had reason to know of the unlawful acts, and failed to prevent or punish those acts.[239]

In addition to the obligation to investigate and prosecute, governments have an obligation to provide victims with information about the investigation into the violations. Victims should be entitled to seek and obtain information on the causes and conditions resulting in rights violations against them.[240]The former UN Commission on Human Rights adopted principles stating that “irrespective of any legal proceedings, victims, their families and relatives have the imprescriptible right to know the truth about the circumstances under which violations took place.”[241]

Under the ICCPR, states also have an obligation “to ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy” “determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the state, and to develop the possibilities of judicial remedy.”[242]

Authorities have a special obligation in cases of enforced disappearance to provide information to the victims’ relatives. The right of victims’ families to know the truth in cases of disappearances is guaranteed by international law,[243]and included in the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.[244]In addition, the Committee against Torture has affirmed that the right of victims to obtain “redress” – guaranteed by article 14 of the Convention against Torture[245]– includes the right to the following remedies:

[E]ffective measures aimed at the cessation of continuing violations; verification of the facts and full and public disclosure of the truth to the extent that such disclosure does not cause further harm or threaten the safety and interests of the victim, the victim’s relatives, witnesses, or persons who have intervened to assist the victim or prevent the occurrence of further violations; the search for the whereabouts of the disappeared, for the identities of the children abducted, and for the bodies of those killed, and assistance in the recovery, identification, and reburial of victims’ bodies in accordance with the expressed or presumed wish of the victims or affected families; an official declaration or judicial decision restoring the dignity, the reputation and the rights of the victim and of persons closely connected with the victim; judicial and administrative sanctions against persons liable for the violations; public apologies, including acknowledgement of the facts and acceptance of responsibility; commemorations and tributes to the victims.[246]

The UN Human Rights Committee has held that state failure to pursue cases or provide information about the fate of a disappeared person to families can inflict extreme anguish upon relatives of the disappeared, which make them victims of the violation as well.[247] For the families, not knowing what happened to a relative is a source of ongoing suffering, and may even amount to torture, according to the UN Working Group on Enforced Disappearance.[248]

According to the African Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance,[249]to which Kenya is a party, anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge should be brought before a judge and should be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release.[250]Any person deprived of liberty should be held in an officially recognized place of detention.[251]Accurate information on the detention of such persons and their place of detention, including transfers, should be promptly available to their family members, their legal representative or to any other persons having a legitimate interest in the information.[252]The principles further note that the accused has a right to legal assistance assigned to him or her in any case where the interest of justice so require.[253]

Furthermore, the African principles states that governments shall ensure that anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention is enabled to claim compensation.[254]

Kenya’s Obligations under the Constitution and Domestic Statutes

The Constitution of Kenya provides for the protection of the freedom and security of an individual, including the right not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause.[255] It also provides for the right not to be detained beyond 24 hours without charge, subjected to any form of violence from either private or public sources, subjected to torture in any manner, whether physical or psychological, subjected to corporal punishment or treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.[256]

Police have an obligation to follow the law while investigating and prosecuting those responsible for crime, including the forms of violence in the northeast for which Al-Shabab has claimed responsibility.[257]The National Police Service Act of 2011 obligates police to, while maintaining law and order, provide assistance to the public when in need, including responding to public complains about abusive officers and a copy of such a report should be submitted to the Independent Policing Oversight Authority.[258]

The law also requires police stations to establish a facility to receive, record and report complaints against police misconduct.[259] Police are also required to make a report of all daily occurrences and incidents encountered and make such a report available to their superiors.[260] The law further obligates the police to record all complaints and charges preferred, the names of all persons arrested and the offences with which they are charged.[261]

KDF officers are ordinarily not allowed to arrest civilians and any such arrests and detention are in violation of the law. The military may however be deployed to “restore peace in any part of Kenya affected by unrest or instability” with the approval of the National Assembly, but even then the law does not explicitly allow KDF to arrest and detain.[262]The ongoing operations in the northeast by KDF are without parliamentary approval.

VIII. Donor Security Assistance to Kenya

“Promises about human rights are not enough. Not nearly enough. . . . the actions we take, the methods we choose, to protect human rights are absolutely critical . . . . Government leaders, politicians, the police, the judiciary, and their partners in civil society must all take action to stop injustices. They must investigate allegations. They must provide protection to victims and witnesses. And they must hold those responsible for these injustices accountable. This is a shared imperative for both the United States and Kenya.”

-US Ambassador to Kenya Robert Godec, May 28, 2015.[263]

Donor officials have raised the importance of human rights protections and concerns for abuses during Kenya’s counterterrorism operations, but it appears to have had little concrete impact on the Kenyan government’s response to or investigations of abuses thus far. And yet, Kenya continues to receive significant security sector support from various bilateral and multilateral partners.

US officials including Secretary of State John Kerry publicly highlighted respect for human rights in counterterrorism operations in speeches in Kenya in the run-up to President Obama’s visit in July 2015.[264] Secretary Kerry called attention to the fact that “President Kenyatta reinforced his agreement with us that human rights and the rule of law have to be respected in the counterterrorism efforts.”[265] British and EU officials have similarly raised the fundamental importance of respect for human rights in efforts to “counter violent extremism.”[266]

But the absence of political will from senior Kenyan officials, including President Kenyatta, illustrated by repeated denials, intimidation of witnesses and victims’ families, interference with IPOA and the absence of investigations should be specifically raised and condemned. The actions of the Kenyan government indicate that donors’ rhetorical comments, though important, are not prompting change in the conduct of Kenyan security forces. The multiplicity of units involved in the abuses documented in this report show that the types of abusive and unlawful long documented in operations led by police, is being perpetuated by at least some units of the KDF and, to a lesser extent, the KWS.

If donors wish to continue support to Kenya’s security forces – the most likely course of action given Kenya’s location, role in the region and the threat to Kenyan and Somali civilians posed by Al-Shabab – they should not provide assistance that may directly contribute to abuses. They should also support, including through their financial assistance, effective measures to investigate abuses, including those documented in this report. Without those steps, the actions of donor countries have and will continue to run contrary to their own public statements and in some cases, legal obligations, to support human rights standards.

The United States

Kenya has benefited from US funding for decades, but the relationship has been strengthened by the US, like numerous other donors, relying on and collaborating with Kenya in operations aimed at countering Al-Shabab in Somalia and in Kenya in recent years. The close working relationship, particularly for counterterrorism interrogations and intelligence was notable for example in 2007, when Human Rights Watch research raised concerns regarding the US Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigations interrogating suspected Somali fighters alongside Kenyan forces.[267]

Although the US has increasingly voiced its concern over human rights violations, particularly in its fight against terrorism, the US maintains Kenya as “a strategic partner and anchor state in East Africa, and as critical to counterterrorism efforts in the region.”[268] According to the US Congressional Research Service, the US provides Kenya with over $8 million in anti-terrorism law enforcement support annually, the largest such allocation to any sub-Saharan African country.[269] While funding to the police has remained more or less steady over the last three years, funding to the KDF particularly for counterterrorism-related training and equipment has increased more than three-fold since 2013, and will reach over 120 million USD in financial year 2016.[270] Kenya also received $750,000 annually in 2013 and 2014 in combating wildlife trafficking from the US, and this rose to $2.050 million in 2015.[271]

A sizeable portion of US assistance to Kenya goes to support both police and military working on border security via the Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs (NADR) and the foreign military assistance, respectively.[272]Given the allegations of abuses by the police’s Rural Border Patrol Unit and the KDF operating in Mandera along the Somali border, questions remain about how closely these units have been vetted, under the Leahy Law, which is designed to prevent or stop US assistance to units responsible for human rights violations, or whether they should be vetted again or scrutinized more closely to ensure there are no violations of US law underway.[273]Human Rights Watch has previously raised concerns for US support to the ATPU because of credible reports of numerous abuses.[274]While the US has not publicly stated that it has ended support to the ATPU, Human Rights Watch understands that the US is not currently providing assistance to the unit. If the ATPU comes under consideration for future assistance, US officials told Human Rights Watch that it would carefully review all available information in order to determine whether to assist the unit.[275]

The mounting evidence of abuses carried out by members of the KDF, as documented in this and other reports, should prompt serious questions regarding the US’s sharp and consistent increases in support to KDF units operating in Garissa, Mandera and Wajir.[276] Those units should also be vetted as required under the Leahy Act, or re-vetted in light of evidence in this and other reports.

At times, US officials have told human rights organizations they need more evidence of individual officers to withhold support as required by the Leahy Act. While identifying the names of individual officers can be challenging, particularly as the officers allegedly involved in disappearances and other abuse often wear civilian clothes, conceal their identity, and conduct operations with many diverse Kenyan security units, the evidence is overwhelming that some unit’s officers are involved in serious abuses. The mounting evidence indicates that more consistent and proactive efforts are required to ensure compliance with the Leahy Act.

Kenya is one of the six African countries that are now receiving support from the Security Governance Initiative (SGI), which was established in 2014.[277] The US government has set aside an initial Ksh6.582 billion ($65 million) to finance partner countries to improve the management, oversight, accountability, and sustainability of security sector institutions.[278] Kenya and the US signed financial support documents during Barack Obama’s visit to Nairobi in July 2015 and Kenya was set to start receiving its share of the funds in 2016.[279]although this funding is marginal compared to other tranches of US security assistance, the agreements can provide a roadmap for raising concerns about how the security forces more generally are both conducting operations and investigating and prosecuting allegations of wrongdoing.

The United Kingdom

The United Kingdom is a key bilateral partner and continues to provide security sector assistance to Kenyan forces.[280] Although human rights organizations and the media have in the past criticized the UK’s role in Kenya’s counterterrorism operations, the UK authorities have only occasionally expressed public disapproval of the ongoing abuses.[281] Where UK authorities raised concerns, they have talked only of their commitment to human rights, calling on Kenya to investigate “any credible allegations” without condemning specific and well-documented instances of abuses in Kenya.[282] It may be that British officials are consistently expressing such concerns to Kenyan officials in private, but that approach hasn’t led to positive reforms or accountability. The absence of progress and the quantity of money flowing to Kenyan forces should prompt the UK to reevaluate its approach in Kenya, specifically regarding counterterrorism operations.

Such public statements by the UK officials, however rare, have not been followed by strong calls for investigations and accountability for the security units that the UK supports. The UK funding to Kenyan security agencies has been increasing each year over the last three years.[283] In 2013, for example, the total UK financial support to the Kenya Defense Forces was $930,000 and $200,000 went to the Kenya Police Service, all totaling $1.13 million to Kenyan security agencies.[284] The funding to the Kenya Police Service over that period was mainly for police reforms and strengthening accountability for the police.[285]

Although the UK does not have direct financial support to the Kenya Wildlife Service, it is partnering with KWS on three projects on Illegal Wildlife Trade Challenge Fund, which is a fund managed by the department for environment, food and rural affairs. Under this fund, the UK has allocated Kenya over $1.105 million and a further $150,801 for training between 2014 and 2018.[286]

The European Union

The EU has provided and pledged increased support to Kenyan police and military for counterterrorism efforts in recent years.[287]

In April 2015, for example, members of the European parliament pledged support for African forces, including Kenya, in combating terrorism.[288]Weeks after the Garissa University College attack, European parliamentarians issued a statement saying they “advocate setting up an EU military training mission in Kenya and supplying Kenya’s military and police forces with modern equipment and training to fight terrorism and prevent the expansion of Al-Shabab.”[289]

Soon after the Westgate mall attack in September 2013, the EU started supporting Kenya and other countries in the region with counterterrorism and anti-money laundering efforts, under a program worth 19 million euros ($21.1 million), which is known as Instrument Contributing to Security and Peace. This includes 11 million euros ($12.2 million) aimed at “strengthening regional counter-terrorism law enforcement.”[290]The program has been running since 2014 and will expire in 2020.[291]

The EU has also been supporting allowances of African Union forces in Somalia, which include the Kenyan police and military among other AMISOM forces, at the cost of $200 million.[292] While the money is not given to Kenya directly,[293] it goes to maintaining Kenyan forces deployed in Somalia.

Until 2015, the EU was providing Kenya with $2.2 million to build houses and other infrastructure in Dadaab refugee camp for the Kenya police, to train police, enhance community policing and advocacy on coexistence between police, refugees and host communities.[294] The EU has also provided Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) with $14.4 million for the construction of roads and bridges within National Parks. Although the money may not have been meant to support KWS’s policing work, it has gone into improving the wildlife agency’s operational efficiency.[295] The EU has also supported human rights organizations to train police on human rights.[296]

Between 2014 and 2016, the EU provided $338,303 to the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights to carry out training of law enforcement agencies on human rights, investigations and redress as well as advocacy work on police accountability.[297]

IX. Recommendations

To the Office of the President and the Executive arm of government

Protect rights of the arrested and all other detained persons

  • Publicly acknowledge the scope and gravity of abuses during counterterrorism operations in Kenya and condemn impunity for such abuses.
  • Direct security forces to end the torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings and arbitrary arrests and direct Kenya’s Police, Kenya Defense Forces and Kenya Wildlife rangers, to ensure prosecutors can take all necessary steps to investigate allegations of abuse and hold those responsible to account.
  • Ensure that all those who have been arrested, including those suspected of links to Al-Shabab, are detained in recognized places of detention and are afforded their full rights as detainees, including the rights to be free from torture or ill-treatment and to have prompt access to a lawyer and family members.
  • Ensure that all those who have been arrested and are reasonably suspected of an offence are credibly charged and promptly brought to justice in a fair and public trial before a competent, independent, and impartial court.
  • Direct that all those who have already been in custody beyond the Constitutional limit of 24 hours and for whom permission of the court has not been sought are either promptly released or are charged before a court of law. Ensure that anyone determined to have been unlawfully detained receives compensation.
  • Direct that all security officers involved in the security operations either identify themselves during operations as required under the law or wear identifying insignia at all times.
  • Ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICCPED).

Accountability for the abusive operations

  • Immediately establish an independent multi-agency and cross-sector commission of inquiry to investigate the ongoing cases of torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings in northeastern Kenya and other parts of the country with a mandate to summon commanders and any officer of any government agency, including the military.
  • Ensure that the Commission of Inquiry summons are respected, complied with and its recommendations promptly implemented.
  • The Commission should, where necessary, be mandated establish the fate or whereabouts of those “disappeared,” alive or dead, provide information to family members, and make recommendations for prosecutions. The Commission should have adequate resources and expertise to investigate individual cases, and its findings should be made public to the greatest extent possible, and handed over to a credible judicial authority to pursue possible prosecutions.
  • Ensure regular and credible investigation of police abuses by accountability mechanisms such as the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), National Police Service Commission and the Internal Affairs Unit to and, in the case of KDF and KWS, review the current accountability regime with the view to creating a strong and effective accountability mechanism for abusive military officers and wildlife rangers.
  • Direct that wildlife rangers, police and military officers implicated in the disappearances, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests and torture in northeastern Kenya be suspended pending comprehensive investigations, disciplinary action or criminal prosecution. Those found to be responsible for serious abuses should be removed from the Kenya Police Service and Kenya Defense Force in addition to any other punishment they may receive from a judicial process.
  • Direct that any wildlife rangers, police and military officers responsible for extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, arbitrary and other unlawful arrests and detention, and torture in northeastern Kenya, including officials who may bear command responsibility be investigated and prosecuted as appropriate, in fair and credible trials.
  • Immediately initiate a process for repeal of recently enacted police and military laws that expand their power to arrest, detain, stop and search while at the same time undermine the rights of accused persons and weaken accountability mechanisms as set out in the 2010 Constitution of Kenya.

Support Families of Victims and Protect Their Rights

  • Create information and support desks in each of the affected counties to provide information to families on the fate or whereabouts of all the disappeared relatives, and possibly provide counselling support to families struggling with the disappearance or killing of their relatives.
  • Ensure that families seeking justice for their relatives who have been killed, disappeared or tortured are protected and encouraged to seek recourse under the law.
  • Ensure that Kenya Police Service officers, wildlife police and military officers found responsible for discouraging, intimidating and threatening families that want to seek justice for their relatives who have been abused are investigated and prosecuted or disciplined as appropriate, and removed from the service.

Respond to Al-Shabab attacks through lawful means

  • Ensure that the Kenya Police Service carry out effective criminal investigations into future attacks to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice in accordance with the law.
  • Ensure that Kenyan security officers are trained on effective policing in line with international standards, and provide them with adequate resources to respond effectively and lawfully to the security challenges Kenya is facing.
  • Strictly prohibit Kenya Wildlife Service rangers, police and military officers from engaging in the now rampant practices of torturing, disappearing and killing. Instead, improve the investigative capacity of the police.

To the Inspector General of Police, the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), National Police Service Commission and Internal Affairs Unit

  • Ensure that reports of abuses by security agencies involved in operations in the northeastern Kenyan counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera are adequately and genuinely investigated, including by IPOA, the Internal Affairs Unit and Kenya Police Service and that the officers found to be responsible are held to account.
  • Investigate reports of police officers who unlawfully failed to discharge their responsibilities in Garissa Police station, Madogo Police station in Garissa county, Wajir Police station, Mandera police station and Fino Police station in Mandera county, among many others, by turning away victims who went to report abuses, threatening witnesses and failing to investigate reports made at the stations. Commanders of these police stations during the periods in question should particularly be suspended from the service, investigated and prosecuted or, where necessary, removed from the service.
  • Prepare a comprehensive register of all police officers, including the County Commissioners and the County Police Commanders, who served in the northeastern region during the period in question. The register should be made available to the independent multi agency Commission to be set up to investigate the abuses in the northeastern region.
  • Carry out a fresh round of vetting of police officers who have been deployed to the northeastern region over the past four years when the abuses were most rampant, including all officers attached to the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit across the country.
  • The Inspector General of Police should exercise his power under Section 385 of the Criminal Procedure Code to arrange for inquests into all cases of extrajudicial killings in the northeastern region.
  • Ensure that the law is followed in all operations and that military officers and Kenya Wildlife Service rangers, who are not legally authorized to carry out arrests or detentions, do not arrest and detain people, and that all those arrested by police are properly booked in police records and detained within police stations as opposed to military facilities or in the bush. Any ranger who engages in unlawful detention should be prosecuted.
  • Ensure that during arrests, police do not wear masks covering their faces, wear identifiable nametags on their uniforms, and drive vehicles with genuine license plates.
  • Ensure that police carry out arrests on the basis of arrest warrants issued by legally recognized courts of law as required by Kenyan law or that those arrested are immediately brought before court and charged.
  • Ensure that police inform those they arrest of their rights, including their right to be assisted by a lawyer; that those arrested are not held incommunicado and that evidence is obtained only through lawful means and not through torture.

To The Chief of Kenya Defense Forces

  • Investigate reports of KDF involvement in torturing, disappearing and killing of people in the ongoing counter terrorism campaign in the northeastern region and ensure that the KDF officers and their commanders implicated in their abuses are held to account.
  • Disclose the identities, whereabouts and any charges of anyone being held inside a military barracks or compound in northeastern Kenya.
  • Investigate the Commanders of KDF bases/camps in Garissa, Wajir and Mandera for illegally authorizing the arrests, detention and torture of people within KDF facilities in the northeastern region.
  • Prepare and submit a register of all KDF officers and commanders deployed to the northeastern region and who may have been involved in the abuses to an independent Commission formed by Kenyan authorities to investigate the abuses.
  • Establish a mechanism to receive and investigate civilian complaints against KDF personnel that is independent of the military chain of command, such as a civilian oversight body similar to the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA).
  • Compensate victims who have suffered physical injury or material loss at the hands of KDF personnel.

To the Director of Public Prosecutions

  • Direct the Inspector General of Police to order for public inquests into all the cases of extrajudicial killings that occurred in northeastern Kenya during the period under question.
  • Direct the Kenya Police Service to investigate reports of abuses by the security forces in Garissa, Wajir and Mandera counties.
  • Prosecute any members of the security forces where there is prima facie evidence of criminal wrongdoing in connection with the abuses in northeastern Kenya, as well as the officers responsible for abuses in other regions of Kenya.

To the Parliament of Kenya

  • Adequately deliberate the abuses by Kenya Defense Forces and the Kenya Police Service in the northeastern region and other parts of the country with the view to adopting a motion to compel the Kenyan government to establish an independent multi agency Commission of inquiry to investigate the abuses.
  • Liaise with the office of the Attorney General to enact a law and create adequate accountability mechanisms that can effectively respond to the rising cases of abuses by the Kenya Defense Forces and Kenya Wildlife Service rangers whenever deployed internally.
  • Parliament should initiate its own Parliamentary Commission of inquiry into the abuses in the north east either to compliment investigations by the independent Commission to be established by the Executive or serve as an alternative in the event that the Executive fails to initiate credible investigations into the abuses.

To Kenya’s International Donors and the United Nations

  • Publicly and privately denounce serious human rights abuses committed by the Directorate of Military Intelligence, Directorate of Criminal Investigations, Anti-Terrorism Police Unit, Rapid Deployment Unit and Rural Border Patrol Unit of the Administration Police, National Intelligence Service and the Kenya Wildlife Service rangers.
  • Publicly and privately urge the Kenyan government to take concrete steps to investigate, arrest, and prosecute those responsible for the torture, disappearances and extrajudicial killings in northeastern Kenya, including those bearing command responsibility. Monitor the progress of these steps regularly.
  • Ensure material support to Kenya’s security forces – including training andlogistics – does not go to units or commanders implicated in the torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings. Should support, including through financial assistance, effective measures to ensure adequate and effective investigation of abuses of this nature countrywide, including those documented in this report, and urge accountability for the perpetrators.
  • Ensure financial support does not go to abusive units or officers associated with the Directorate of Military Intelligence, Directorate of Criminal Investigations under the police, the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit, Rural Border Patrol Unit, Rapid Deployment Unit of the Administration Police, the National Intelligence Service and Kenya Wildlife Service.
  • Support the establishment of an independent commission, as proposed in this report, to provide information on the fate or whereabouts of those killed and forcibly disappeared in northeastern Kenya and other parts of Kenya and to support judicial proceedings against those allegedly responsible for the abuses.
  • Support the establishment of a special vetting mechanism, in addition to the slow but ongoing police vetting process, to remove police, military, wildlife rangers and secret service officers found responsible for serious human rights abuses.
  • Encourage Kenyan authorities to respond to Al-Shabab attacks in accordance with international human rights standards.

Acknowledgements

This report was researched and written by Otsieno Namwaya, researcher at Human Rights Watch’s Africa division, and edited by Maria Burnett, senior researcher in the Africa division, Leslie Lefkow, deputy Africa director, Clive Baldwin, senior legal advisor for the legal and policy office at Human Rights Watch and Babatunde Olugboji, deputy program director at Human Rights Watch. Letta Tayler, senior terrorism and counterterrorism researcher at Human Rights Watch and Laetitia Bader, Somalia researcher at Human Rights Watch also reviewed the report. Godfrey Odhiambo, a Nairobi intern, provided support with initial project planning and desk research.

Associates in the Africa division provided editorial and production assistance. Olivia Hunter, publications associate, Fitzroy Hepkins, administrative manager, provided production assistance and John Emerson helped with map design.

Human Rights Watch would like to thank the victims and witnesses of security forces abuses in the northeastern Kenya counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera who shared their experiences, and others in the three counties who participated in various ways, including assisting the researcher identify the relevant victims and witnesses, the human rights activists who initially assisted these victims and journalists who highlighted the abuses at great risk.

Human Rights Watch acknowledges both local and foreign government officials and security officers who shared details about the Kenya government’s response, security forces operations in the three counties and foreign funding for Kenyan security forces.

Annex 1: Cases of disappearances and suspected killings documented by Human Rights Watch

NO

FULL NAMES AND APPROX AGE (WHERE POSSIBLE)

APPROX DATE OF ARREST

COUNTY WHERE ARREST

OCCURRED

SECURITY FORCE ALLEGEDLY INVOLVED

NATURE OF SUSPECTED HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE

CURRENT STATUS OF CASE

1.

Sheikh Hassan

March 2015

Mandera

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

2.

Abdiwelli Ibrahim Sheikh

March 18, 2015

Mandera

Suspected to be KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

3.

Feisal Mohamed Ibrahim

March 18, 2015

Mandera

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

4.

Mohamed Mohamud

April, 2015

Mandera

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

5.

Omar Yusuf Mohamed, 26 years old

April 26, 2015

Mandera

ATPU, CID

Enforced disappearance

Missing

6.

Abdinassir Ahmed Mohammed

May, 2015

Mandera

ATPU & other police units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

7.

Abdirizak Mohamed Haji, 29 years old

October 24, 2015

Mandera

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

8.

Isaack Kusow Mohamed, 37 years old

November 30, 2015

Mandera

Unknown

Enforced disappearance

Missing

9.

Abdilatif Mohamed, 18 years old

April, 2013

Garissa

Multiple units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

10.

Ahmed Farah Muhumed, 42 years old

February, 2014

Garissa

KWS

Enforced disappearance

Missing

11.

Siad Mahat Ahmed, 23 years

February 2014

Garissa

KWS

Enforced disappearance

Missing

12.

Sugu Apkea, 40 years old

February, 2014

Garissa

KWS

Enforced disappearance

Missing

13.

Yusuf Abdi Iman, 25 years

March 2015

Garissa

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

14.

Keynan Abdullahi, late 20s

March 26, 2015

Garissa

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

15.

Hassan Abdullahi Adan, 42 years old

March 26, 2015

Garissa

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

16.

Mohamed Geni

March 26, 2015

Garissa

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

17.

Asman Abdi Dakane

April 2015

Garissa

KDF/ATPU

Enforced disappearance

Missing

18.

Hamza Mohamed Bare, 26 years old

April 8, 2015

Garissa

ATPU & KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

19.

Siyat Rage Jama, 40 years old

April 9, 2015

Garissa

ATPU & KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

20.

Mahat Ahmed, late 30s

April 20, 2015

Garissa

Multiple units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

21.

Ismail Mohamed, 23 years old

April 20, 2015

Garissa

Multiple units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

22.

Rahma Ali, 24 years old

April 20, 2015

Garissa

Multiple units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

23.

Anab Abdullahi (Mahat’s wife), mid 20s

April 20, 2015

Garissa

Multiple units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

24.

Omar Salat Kathie, 47 years

Mid-June 2015

Garissa

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

25.

Abdifatah Odowa Adan, 30 years old

May 2014

Nairobi

NIS, CID

Enforced disappearance

Missing

26.

Ibrahim Bilkan Ayilow, 26 yrs old

June 10, 2015

Nairobi

Suspected KDF, CID

Enforced disappearance

Missing

27.

Mohammed Abdullahi, 35 years old

June 10, 2015

Nairobi

Suspected KDF, CID

Enforced disappearance

Missing

28.

Ms Asha Abdisalam Abdullahi, 30 years old

July 17, 2015

Nairobi

AP, other police units

Enforced disappearance

Missing

29.

Mahat Issak, 30 years old

March 15, 2015

Wajir

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

30.

Hassan Derow, 35 years old

March 17, 2015

Wajir

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

31.

Ali Warsame, 35 years old

April 9, 2015

Wajir

KPR, RDU & KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

32.

Ali Duale Keynan, 21 years old

April 14, 2015

Wajir

ATPU

Enforced disappearance

Missing

33.

Hussein Ali Abdullahi, 46 years

May 8, 2015

Wajir

KDF

Enforced disappearance

Missing

34.

Farah Ibrahim Korio, 45 year old

June 29, 2015

Wajir

KDF & ATPU

Enforced disappearance

Missing

35.

Abdiwuhab Noor Diis

April, 2015

Mandera

KDF and ATPU

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

36.

Hassan Adan Yarrow, 26 years

April 4, 2015

Mandera

KPR & KDF

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

37.

Hassan Ndimil Isaak

July, 2015

Mandera

KDF

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

38.

Abdi Bare Mohamed, 22 years

August 13, 2015

Mandera

CID

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

39.

Isnina Musa Sheikh, 38 years old

December 3, 2015

Mandera

KDF

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

40.

Abdilmalik Mohamed (alias Ibrahim)

April, 2013

Garissa

Multiple units

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

41.

Mohamed Omar, 32 years old

August 2014

Garissa

ATPU

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

42.

Ali Omar, 24 years old

December 2014

Garissa

RDU unit of AP

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

43.

Farah Mohamed Ali, 33 years old

December 2014

Garissa

Multiple units

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

44.

Sheikh Mohamed Ali Kher, 55 years old

December 25, 2014

Garissa

Suspected ATPU

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

45.

Mohamud Abdi, 30 years old

June 23, 2014

Nairobi

NIS

Extrajudicial killing

Body found

Annex 2: Letters to KDF, Police, and KWS

Letter to KDF

March 23, 2016

General Samson Mwathethe,

The Chief of General Staff,

Kenya Defense Forces,

Ulinzi House, Lenana Road,

P.O Box 40668 – 00100,

Nairobi, Kenya.

Tel: +254 020 2712054

Email:

Dear General Mwathethe,

I am writing to solicit your views and input regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the north eastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years. As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international nongovernmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective.

We have not yet had an opportunity to meet with you since you began as Chief of Kenya Defense Forces. Given the breadth of our work in Kenya and the importance of the military in the ongoing operations in north eastern Kenya, we would very much appreciate an opportunity to meet and discuss our ongoing concerns for human rights issues in Kenya as well as the specific queries attached to this letter.

Your response is especially important so that we can accurately reflect your views in our forthcoming research. In order for us to include your response in our work, we would very much appreciate a written answer to the attached questions by April 25, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:…We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us. Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response from your offices at your convenience, prior to April 21.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

I. Questions and cases of suspicious deaths

We are concerned that at least four people eventually found dead were last seen by multiple eyewitnesses in the custody of KDF officers. In these cases, families of the individuals listed below eventually managed to trace and identify the bodies of their relatives, in most cases without the assistance of the police, and buried them. We would appreciate any information you might have on the circumstances leading to the death of the individuals below and also your response on some of the specific questions regarding KDF command structure and allegations of extrajudicial killings in north eastern Kenya:

Questions

  1. In the four cases listed below, concerned relatives and friends reported an individual as missing to both the police, and in two of the cases to KDF, while searching for the person and then later when their body was found. We would appreciate any information regarding when, how and why these individuals were arrested by the KDF?
  2. What measures, if any, have been taken to investigate the cause of these deaths and hold those responsible to account?
  3. Have there been any internal investigations of KDF officers who may have been implicated in cases of disappearances and extrajudicial killings in the north eastern region?
  4. Human Rights Watch research indicates that KDF officers threatened and intimidated witnesses to the arrests and those who want to pursue justice for the victims of these killings. Has KDF investigated these claims and, if so, what measures have been taken to ensure that officers implicated in the obstruction of justice are held to account?
  5. Kindly share information on the internal accountability mechanisms for officers who may be implicated in human rights abuses and how often this has been applied in the past?

The Cases

a. Hassan Adan Yarrow, 26 years old

Yarrow was last seen by eyewitnesses around 6pm on April 18, 2015 in the custody of Kenya Police Reservists and KDF officers, who were interrogating him, while beating him outside his family home outside Mandera town. Police later booked him into Mandera Police station same day. He was released the next day and hospitalized for injuries he had sustained. He died on April 20 at Mandera Referral Hospital. Human Rights Watch understands that the postmortem report indicates Hassan died from internal bleeding.

b. Abdiwahab Noor Diis, 35 years old

Noor was last seen alive on April 22, 2015 while being arrested from his retail shop in Omar Jillo, about 40kms from Mandera town, by people in KDF uniforms driving one APC and one tanker. He was arrested along with five other people. Noor’s body was found on April 27, 2015 around Fino area, some 90kms from Mandera town. Noor’s body had three bullet wounds in the back of his head and two others from the back of his shoulders – one bullet in each shoulder.

c. Hassan Ndimbil Isaak, 35 years old

Hassan was last seen alive on July 8, 2015 in the company of KDF officers who picked him from his Quranic School in Mandera and informed his students that they were taking him to the police. A few days earlier, people who introduced themselves as ATPU officers had gone to the school, searched it and left after they did not find Hassan. The ATPU officers asked the area chief to trace and present Hassan to the police, but Hassan and another man, Yusuf Isaak, were arrested by KDF before the chief could do so. Hassan’s body was found buried in a shallow grave in Omar Jillow Location, but the whereabouts of the man with whom he was arrested remain unknown.

d. Isnina Musa Sheikh, 38 years old

Isnina was last seen alive on December 3, 2015 around lunch time at her food kiosk in Mandera town as she was being arrested by four masked men in plainclothes who were carrying pistols and MI6 guns, most commonly seen with KDF officers in Mandera. She was driven away in a white Toyota Probox car escorted by what appeared to be two Land Cruisers with KDF insignia. On December 4, 2015, a report about her arrest by unknown people was made to Mandera Police Station. On December 6, Isnina’s body was found in a shallow grave in Arabia, some 50kms from Mandera town, and later taken to Mandera Hospital Mortuary. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that ATPU officers had arrested Isnina twice before over alleged links with Al-Shabab in 2016, but she was never charged with any crime.

Human Rights Watch is also concerned about the circumstances that surrounded the deaths of the following people. There is no clear evidence of KDF involvement in this cases, but they occurred in an area where KDF is operational and Human Rights Watch has also been made to understand that police units have previously handed detainees to KDF soon after arrest. We would appreciate any information you could share regarding the cases below:

a. Ibrahim Abdimalik, 38 years old

Ibrahim Abdimalik was picked from his house in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, at the end of April 2013 by up to 50 masked people in uniforms who introduced themselves as police officers and were armed with spotlighted HK G3 Rifles. The 50 people raided the house and searched the compound in an operation that lasted nearly 2 hours before arresting Ibrahim Abdimalik and his 18 year old brother who shared a house with him and whose whereabouts remain unknown. Ibrahim’s mutilated body was found near Thika town, close to Nairobi, over 300km from Garissa town. The matter was reported at Garissa and Thika Central Police stations, but relatives are still awaiting information on the findings of the investigations.

b. Mohamed Omar Said, 32 year old

He was picked from his house in Bula Punda neighborhood of Garissa town in early August of 2014 at around 10pm by people in plainclothes. A report of his being arrested was made at Garissa Police station. Three days later, his body was found at Bangale area, nearly 70km from Garissa town along Garissa- Nairobi highway. All the joints of his limbs and the skull were broken. The death was reported at Madogo Police station but the matter has not been investigated.

c. Sheikh Mohamed Ali Kher, 55 years old

Sheikh Kher was kidnapped by unknown people along Posta Road, Garissa town, on the morning of December 25, 2014. His body was found by residents in Embu area, more than 200km from Garissa town, on December 27, 2014. His body was later identified by family members because of documents found on him. He had been a preacher at Jamia Mosque in Garissa. The matter was reported to the police but relatives are still awaiting information on the investigations.

e. Mohamud Abdi, 30 years old

Mohamud was last seen alive on June 23, 2015 on 12th street, Eastleigh, where he was arrested by three people in plainclothes in hired white taxi. The three people showed Mohamud and two other young men who were with him identification cards for National Intelligence Service and said they were taking him to Pangani Police station. In July his body was found at City Mortuary, Nairobi, where records showed that it had been signed in by someone named Inspector Makau on June 25. DNA tests confirmed the body was that of Mohamud.

f. Abdi Bare Mohamed, 22 years old

Abdi Bare Mohamed was first threatened by a CID officer who linked him with Al-Shabab and demanded Ksh50,000 as protection from being killed. The officer told the family to call him on 0722 92 47 79 to pay to protect Abdi’s life. Abdi Bare was last seen alive on August 18, 2015 and a report about his absence was made at Mandera Police station on August 19, 2015. On September 5, 2015, Abdi Bare’s body was taken to Mandera Hospital Mortuary by individuals who refused to identify themselves. Another report on Abdi Bare was made at Mandera Police Station on December 9, 2015 (OB No. 21/09/12/2015). The matter has not been investigated, according to witnesses.

II. Questions and cases of suspected “enforced disappearances”

Relatives and friends of the individuals listed below cannot locate these individuals in detention anywhere. Multiple eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that the individuals were either last seen in the custody of the KDF or were seen being taken to a KDF facility. We are concerned that these cases may constitute an enforced disappearance. Under international law, an enforced disappearance occurs when someone is deprived of their liberty by agents of the state or those acting with its acquiescence, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person.

We would appreciate any information you can provide on the whereabouts, legal status and health of the individuals described below. We would also appreciate your response to these general questions about police and KDF response to cases of disappeared or missing individuals.

  1. What is the appropriate procedure if someone believes that their relative is being held in a military facility, barrack or other location under the control of the KDF? To whose attention should this be raised and how can families gain access to basic information regarding their legal status and visit the detained person?
  2. Considering that under Kenyan law KDF officers are not authorized to arrest and detain people, and also considering that military camps or barracks are not legally designated as detention facilities, could you clarify the legal basis of the arrests and detentions by KDF?
  3. Relatives of the individuals listed below have in many cases made reports of a missing person to their respective police stations as per the law, but have not received help, including where the individuals are alleged to have been arrested or are in the custody of KDF officers. How does KDF coordinate with police to investigate allegations of missing people in situations where the person may be in the custody of KDF?
  4. Families and friends of missing individuals have alleged threats, harassment and intimidation by security agencies in the families’ pursuit for justice. Is your office aware of these types of allegations and, if so, could you please share information on the outcome of any internal investigations or other efforts on this issue? If not, what should families do when facing threats for pursuing such information?
  5. We would appreciate if you could share information on any cases where KDF officers have been investigated for a case of an enforced disappearance or an extrajudicial killing in north eastern Kenya. How many such cases have been there in the past three years and could you please share any relevant information about the status of such investigations and/or any court process?
  6. During operations to arrest alleged terrorism suspects in Wajir, Mandera and Garissa, which part of the Kenyan state security forces is operationally in command and how do police and military coordinate? What measures are taken to ensure due process and fair trials for the alleged terrorism suspects in the custody of KDF?

The Cases

1. Mohamed Farah Muhumed, 42, Siad Mahat Ahmed, 23, and Sugu Apkea, 40 years old

They were arrested in February of 2014 by more than 10 armed Kenya Wildlife Service rangers from Bula Tawakal, Garissa, at around 9.30pm and the matter of disappearance reported at Garissa police station. Their whereabouts remain unknown.

2. Hassan Derow, 35 years old

Hassan Derow was arrested from his small retail business in the middle of Wajir town on March 17, 2015 by security officers using a silver taxicab. Two of the officers, suspected to be military intelligence officers, were in plain clothes and armed with a pistol. The third man was a uniformed Administration Police officer. He was held at Wajir Military camp for four days, according to sources privy to his case, but the he was moved to an unknown location. The whereabouts of Hassan Derow remain unknown.

3. Abdiwelli Ibrahim Sheikh, 28 years old, and Feisal Mohamed Ibrahim, 27 years old

Witnesses say they were arrested from their homes in Bulla Jamhuria, Mandera, on the night of March 21, 2015 by people who wore jungle green uniforms normally associated with the military and allegedly taken to Mandera military camp. The whereabouts of Abdiwelli and Feisal remain unknown. Their disappearance was reported to Mandera Police Station (OB No. 40/21/4/2015).

4. Hassan Abdullahi Adan, 42 years old, Yusuf Abdi Iman and three others

Hassan, who is from Shabaha village, Garissa county, had taken his six year old child to Garissa Nursing Home in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood on March 26, 2015. He had gone to Durdur Hotel a few steps away from the nursing home when more than 20 military officers in two AMISOM vehicles raided it and started shooting. The officers carried away five people, among them Hassan Abdullahi and Yusuf Abdi, an employee at the restaurant, the owner of the restaurant, Mr Geni, his waiter, Mr Keynan and a fifth person who is unidentified. The matter was reported at Garissa Police Station. Their whereabouts remain unknown.

5. Sheikh Hassan Ahmed, 43 years old

Sheikh Hassan Ahmed was last seen at the Mandera Islamic Centre, an orphans’ home, in the hands of KDF officers a few days after the attack on Garissa University College on April 2, 2015. Uniformed KDF officers in two military tankers (large, heavily armored combat vehicles) allegedly took him to Mandera military camp, but his current whereabouts are unknown.

6. Osman Abdi Ali Dagane, early 30s, formerly a security guard at Garissa University College

He was arrested at Garissa University College where he was a security guard on April 3, 2015 by KDF officers who took him to Nairobi and charged with aiding the attack on the university. Friends and relatives have not received information of his whereabouts since and their efforts to trace him have not borne fruit.

7. Hamza Mohamed Bare, 26 years old

He was arrested from a mobile phone shop in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood in the outskirts of Garissa town where he worked by four people in plainclothes carrying handcuffs on April 8, 2015. The incident was captured on CCTV cameras installed in the shop and aired on local TV stations. The matter was reported to Garissa Police station where the footage from the CCTV cameras was also handed to police. Police at Garissa Police station allegedly told those reporting his arrest that he was in the custody of military intelligence. His whereabouts remain unknown.

8. Mohamed Mohamud Musa, 23 years old

A money changer at the Kenya- Somali border in Mandera, he was arrested at around 10am on April 9, 2015 by people who did not identify themselves. According to eyewitnesses, the two were last seen being taken to Mandera military camp by a combined team of officers in plainclothes and others in Administration Police uniforms. His whereabouts remain unknown.

9. Siyat Rage, 40 years old

Siyat Rage was arrested at around 10am on April 9, 2015 from a restaurant where he worked in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood in the outskirts of Garissa town by plainclothes security agents driving a vehicle with the official government of Kenya registration plates. Some eyewitnesses asserted that the arresting officials were known to be members of the ATPU and military intelligence. His whereabouts remain unknown. The incident was reported to Garissa Police station the same day but no further information has been forthcoming.

10. Ali Warsame, 35 years old

Uniformed officers from the Kenya Police Reservists arrested Ali Warsame from Urale market, Wajir town, on April 9, 2015. He was handed over to the Commander of the Rapid Deployment Unit in Wajir, a Mr Mohamed Sheikh aka Hambarsade, who is now the County Commander of Administration Police in Wajir, and KDF officers. The whereabouts of Ali Warsame remain unknown.

11. Ali Duale Keynan, 21 years old

Five security officers in plain clothes arrested Ali Duale Keynan from a cyber café in Wagbare area in Wajir town on April 14, 2015. The five were driving two vehicles: one was a white Toyota Hilux Pickup with no registration number plates. Several eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that this vehicle is known in Wajir town to be used by Border Patrol Unit Police officers. The other was a white Toyota Land Cruiser, also without registration number plates, known in Wajir town to be used by the ATPU. Human Rights Watch was also told that Mr Mohamed Sheikh, a senior superintendent of police attached to the Rapid Deployment Unit, was part of the team that arrested Ali Duale Keynan. The whereabouts of Ali Duale remain unknown.

12. Mr Mahat Ahmed, 38 years old, Mr Ismail Mohamed, 23 years old, Ms Rahma Ali, 24 years and Ms Anab Abdullahi, 25 years old

The four men and women were picked up from their houses in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa town, by suspected security officers who were armed, with some wearing plainclothes and others military uniforms, on April 20, 2015. The matter was reported at Garissa Police station but the whereabouts of the four remain unknown.

13. Abdifatah Othowa Adan, 30 years old

A manager with E-Coach Bus Service, Abdifatah was picked up from Kilimanjaro Hotel in Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood on April 20, 2015. The people who picked him showed identification cards from the National Intelligence Service. The matter was reported both at Garissa police station and in Nairobi’s Pangani police station and later raised in parliament by Wajir West legislator, Abdikadir Ore Ahmed. Abdifatah’s whereabouts remain unknown.

14. Abdilatif Abdimalik, 18 years old

He was picked up at night together with his elder brother, Abdimalik, from their house in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa town, around April 25, 2013 by more than 50 uniformed officers who introduced themselves as police. Abdimalik ’s body was found in Thika three days later, but the whereabouts of Abdilatif remain unknown.

15. Omar Yusuf Mohamed, 26 years old

Was arrested from Baquli restaurant in Mandera town during the day on April 26, 2015 by several security officers, among them three CID officers familiar to the residents of Mandera. His case was reported to Mandera Police Station and recorded as missing person under OB No 29/05/05/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown. Omar Yusuf had previously been arrested by the ATPU in August 2014 and held at the ATPU offices in Upper Hill, Nairobi, where he was interrogated for 20 days and released, according to witnesses.

16. Hussein Ali Abdullahi, 46 years old

He was arrested from his retail shop in the middle of Wajir town, next to the Chief’s camp, on May 8, 2015 by plain clothes security officers driving a black truck with the Government of Kenya insignia. Three men, some of whom were identified by witnesses as police officers attached to the Border Patrol Unit, came out of the truck, arrested Hussein, and took him into custody. Other witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the police took Hussein to Wajir Military camp, where he was being held for at least five days but his current is whereabouts remain unknown.

17. Abdinasir Ahmed Mohamed, 30 years old

A bus conductor who was last seen on May 20, 2015 in the custody of KDF officers who took him to Mandera military camp where he was detained for 15 days. He was then released and handed over to the Mandera Police Station, reportedly unable to walk. Witnesses say he was last seen at the police station with Border Patrol Police officers. His whereabouts since then are not known.

18. Sheikh Ibrahim Bilkan Ayilow, 26, and Mohamed Abdullahi, 35 years old

Three people who did not identify themselves arrested Ibrahim and Mohamed from a mosque in Embakasi, Nairobi, on June 10, 2015. Those who arrested them are suspected to have been security officers because they had pistols and handcuffs. The whereabouts of the two remain unknown.

19. Farah Ibrahim Korio, 45 years old

He was arrested on June 30, 2015 inside Wajir Police station where he had gone to record a statement about unknown people who were inquiring after him. The three plain clothed men who arrested him inside the police station introduced themselves as military intelligence officers. They first held Farah briefly inside the ATPU offices at Wajir Police station before driving in the director of Wajir military camp. The matter was reported to Wajir police station under OB No 36/29/06/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown.

20. Ms Asha Abdi Abdisalan Abdullahi, 30 years old

Originally a resident of Garissa’s Taqwa neighborhood, she was picked up from her house on 12th Street, Eastleigh, by a team of Administration police officers and some plain clothes officers suspected to be military intelligence officers on July 17, 2015. She was driven away in a white Toyota Probox, KCC 406Y. The matter was reported at Pangani Police Station under OB No. 56/29/07/2015. Her whereabouts remain unknown.

21. Abdirizak Mohamed Haji, 29 years old

Ten officers who introduced themselves as KDF based in Somalia arrested Abdirizak from his parent’s house in Mandera East on the night of October 24, 2015. The matter of his disappearance was reported to Mandera Police Station under OB No 21/09/12/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown.

22. Mahat Isaak, 30 years old

He was arrested around April 20, 2015 by people suspected to be military officers and taken to Wajir military camp for interrogation. The matter was reported to Wajir police station but no follow up has been made to the relatives by the police. The whereabouts of Mahat Isaak remain unknown.

Letter to Police

March 23, 2016

Joseph Kipchirchir Boinett,

The Inspector General,

Kenya Police Service,

Nairobi (Kenya).

Tel: +254 020 3341411

Email:

Dear Sir,

I am writing to solicit your views and input regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the North Eastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years.

As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international non-governmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective.

We have not yet had an opportunity to meet with you since you took the role of inspector general of police. Given the breadth of our work in Kenya and the importance of the police in protecting human rights, we would very much appreciate an opportunity to meet and discuss our ongoing concerns for human rights abuses in Kenya as well as the specific queries attached to this letter.

Your response to the attached inquiry is especially important so that we can accurately reflect your views in our forthcoming research on detentions in Kenya. In order for us to include your response in our work, we would very much appreciate a written answer to the attached questions by April 25, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:... We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us. Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response at your convenience, prior to April 25.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

I. Questions and cases of suspicious deaths

In some cases documented by Human Rights Watch, the family members of those arrested in Mandera, Wajir and Garissa, whose whereabouts in detention could not be established, were able to trace and eventually identify the bodies of their relatives, in most cases without the assistance of the police.

In each of the nine cases below, Human Rights Watch has found that witnesses reported to police both their initial disappearances and their subsequent death.

We would appreciate your response to the following questions dealing with cases of suspicious deaths.

6. Kenyan Law, including the National Police Service Act and the Criminal Procedure Code, requires that any death that is suspected to have occurred in the hands of a state security agent, including the police, be subjected to a public inquest to establish the circumstances under which the individual died. What measures have the police taken to ensure that inquests are held in these cases and, where this has not been done, could you explain why there has been no inquest, and whether there are any plans for pending or future inquests?

7. What avenues exist for the families to regularly receive information that can enable them keep track of the status of investigations into the deaths of their relatives or interact with the investigators to support investigations?

8. When bodies are found, what is the police procedure for determining the identity of the individual? Is there any instance of any of the cases listed above where such a procedure has been undertaken? If so, we would appreciate any relevant details of the procedures.

9. What should families of people who have died in unclear circumstances do to support police efforts to ensure justice and accountability for the deaths?

 

10. And finally, what steps have police taken to establish the circumstances under which some individuals first went missing and eventually were found dead? Are there any ongoing investigations with regard to the below cases?

g. Ibrahim Abdimalik, 38 years old

He was picked from his house in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, at the end of April 2013 by up to 50 masked people in uniforms who introduced themselves as police officers and were armed with spotlighted HK G3 Rifles. The 50 people raided houses and searched the compound in an operation that lasted nearly 2 hours before arresting Ibrahim Abdimalik and his 18 year old brother who shared a house with him and whose whereabouts remain unknown. Ibrahim’s mutilated body was found near Thika town, close to Nairobi, over 300km from Garissa town. The matter was reported at Garissa and Thika Central Police stations, but information on the findings of the investigations are still being awaited.

h. Mohamed Omar Said, 32 year old

He was picked from his house in Bula Punda neighborhood of Garissa town in early August of 2014 at around 10pm by people in plainclothes. A report of his being picked was made at Garissa Police station. Three days after he was picked, his body was found at Bangale area, nearly 70km from Garissa town along Garissa – Nairobi highway. All the joints of his limbs and the skull were broken. The death was reported at Madogo Police station but information on the status of the investigation has not been available.

i. Sheikh Mohamed Ali Kher, 55 years old

The man was kidnapped by unknown people along Posta Road, Garissa town, on the morning of December 25, 2014. His body was found by residents in Embu area, more than 200km from Garissa town, on December 27, 2014. The body was later identified by family members through documents found on him. He was a preacher at Jamia Mosque in Garissa. The matter was reported to the police in Embu and Garissa Police stations but information on the investigations has not been available.

j. Hassan Adan Yarrow, 26 years old

He was last seen at 6pm on April 18, 2015 in the company of Kenya Police Reservists and KDF officers, who were interrogating while beating him and booked him into Mandera Police station the same day. He was released the next day and hospitalized from injuries he had sustained. He died on April 20 at Mandera Referral Hospital. Postmortem results showed he died from internal bleeding. We could not access any evidence of investigation.

k. Abdiwahab Noor Diis, 35 years old

Last seen alive on April 22, 2015 being taken away from his retail shop in Omar Jillo, about 40kms from Mandera town, by people in KDF uniforms driving one APC and one tanker. He was taken along with five other people. Noor’s body was found on April 27, 2015 around Fino area, some 90kms from Mandera town, but the other five people, who are unidentified, have not been seen since.

l. Mohamud Abdi, 30 years old

He was last seen alive on June 23, 2015 on 12th street, Eastleigh, where he was arrested by three people in plain clothes in hired white taxi. The three people showed Mohamud and two other young men who were with him identification cards for National Intelligence Service and said they were taking him to Pangani Police station. His body was in July found at City Mortuary, Nairobi, where records showed that it had been checked in by an Inspector Makau on June 25th. DNA tests confirmed the body was that of Mohamud.

m. Hassan Ndimbil Isaak, 35 years old

Last seen alive on July 8, 2015 in the company of KDF officers who picked him from his Quranic School in Mandera and informed his students that they were taking him to the police. A few days earlier, people who introduced themselves as ATPU officers had gone to the school, searched it and left after they did not find him. The ATPU officers asked the area Chief to trace and present him to the police, but Hassan and another man, Yusuf Isaak, were arrested by KDF before the Chief could present him to police. Hassan’s body was found buried in a shallow grave in Omar Jillow Location, but the whereabouts of the man with whom he was arrested remain unknown.

n. Abdi Bare Mohamed, 22 years old

Was first harangued and threatened by a CID officer who linked him with Al-Shabaab and demanded Ksh50, 000 as protection from being killed. The officer told the family to call him on 0722 92 47 79 about the issue before Abdi is killed. Abdi Bare was last seen alive on August 18, 2015 and a report about his absence was made at Mandera Police station on August 19, 2015 but witnesses said the report was soon removed from police records. On September 5, 2015, Abdi Bare’s body was taken to Mandera Hospital Mortuary by individuals who refused to identify themselves. Another report on Abdi Bare was made at Mandera Police Station on December 9, 2015 (OB No. 21/09/12/2015). The matter has not been investigated, according to witnesses.

o. Ms Isnina Musa Sheikh, 38 years old

She was last seen alive on December 3, 2015 at lunch time at her food kiosk in Mandera town as she was being arrested by four masked men in plainclothes who were carrying pistols and MI6 guns, most commonly seen with KDF officers in Mandera. She was driven away in a white Toyota Probox car escorted by two Land Cruisers with KDF insignia. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that Ms Isnina had previously been arrested twice last year by ATPU officers. On December 4, 2015, a report about the incident was made at Mandera Police Station. On December 6, Ms Isnina’s body was found in a shallow grave in Arabia, some 50kms from Mandera town, and later taken to Mandera Hospital Mortuary.

II. Questions and cases of suspected “enforced disappearances”

Based on numerous interviews with eyewitnesses, Human Rights Watch is concerned that the individuals described below were last seen in the custody of state security agents and their whereabouts are now unknown. In some instances, relatives have reported their concerns to relevant police stations and have the applicable OB numbers.

We would appreciate any information you can provide on the whereabouts, legal status and health of the individuals described below. We would also appreciate your response to these general questions about police response to cases of disappeared or missing individuals.

7. Relatives of the individuals listed below have in many cases made reports to their respective police stations as per the law. Could you please let us know what steps your office has taken to follow up on reported missing individuals and trace their relatives?

8. Once a file has an OB number, what is the appropriate procedure for police to follow up and investigate? Who is in charge of communicating with those who have reported an individual as missing?

9. Families and friends of missing individuals have alleged threats, harassment and intimidation by security agencies in the families’ pursuit for justice. Is your office aware of these types of allegations and, if so, could you please share information on the outcome of any internal investigations or other efforts on this issue? If not, what should families do when faced with such a situation?

10. Are you aware of any cases where police have been investigated for a case of an enforced disappearance or an extrajudicial killing in north eastern Kenya and would you be willing to share relevant details about the status of such investigations and/or any court process?

11. During operations to arrest alleged terrorism suspects in Wajir, Mandera and Garissa, which part of the Kenyan state security forces is operationally in command and how do police and military coordinate?

Cases

23. Mohamed Farah Muhumed, 42, Siad Mahat Ahmed, 23, and Sugu Apkea, 40 years old

Were arrested in February of 2014 by more than 10 armed Kenya Wildlife Service rangers from Bula Tawakal, Garissa, at around 9.30pm and the matter of disappearance reported at Garissa police station. Their whereabouts remain unknown.

24. Hassan Derow, 35 years old

Was arrested from his small retail business in the middle of Wajir town, on March 17, 2015 by security officers using a silver taxicab. Two of the officers, suspected to be military intelligence officers, were in plain clothes and armed with a pistol. The third man was a uniformed Administration Police officer. Witnesses said that Hassan was held at Wajir Military camp for four days when he was moved to an unknown location. His whereabouts remain unknown.

25. Abdiwelli Ibrahim Sheikh, 28 years old, and Feisal Mohamed Ibrahim, 27 years old

Witnesses say they were arrested from their homes in Bulla Jamhuria, Mandera, on the night of March 21, 2015 by people who wore jungle green uniforms normally associated with the military and allegedly taken to Mandera military camp. The whereabouts of Abdiwelli and Feisal remain unknown. Their disappearance was reported to Mandera Police Station (OB No. 40/21/4/2015).

26. Hassan Abdullahi Adan, 42 years old, Yusuf Abdi Iman and three others

Hassan, who is from Shabaha village, Garissa county, had taken his six year old child to Garissa Nursing Home in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood on March 26, 2015. He had gone to Durdur Hotel a few steps away from the nursing home when more than 20 military officers in two AMISOM vehicles raided it and started shooting. The officers carried away five people, among them Hassan Abdullahi and Yusuf Abdi, an employee at the restaurant, the owner of the restaurant, Mr Geni, his waiter, Mr Keynan and a fifth person who is unidentified. The matter was reported at Garissa Police Station. Their whereabouts remain unknown.

27. Sheikh Hassan Ahmed, 43 years old

Last seen at the Mandera Islamic Centre, an orphans’ home, in the hands of KDF officers a few days after the attack on Garissa University College on April 2, 2015. Uniformed KDF officers in two military tankers (large, heavily armored combat vehicles) allegedly took him to Mandera military camp, but his current whereabouts are unknown.

28. Osman Abdi Ali Dagane, early 30s, formerly a security guard at Garissa University College

He was arrested at Garissa University College where he was a security guard on April 3, 2015 by KDF officers who took him to Nairobi and handed over to the ATPU who charged him with aiding the attack on the university. Friends and relatives have not received information of his whereabouts since and their efforts to trace him have not borne fruit.

29. Hamza Mohamed Bare, 26 years old

He was arrested from a mobile phone shop in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood in the outskirts of Garissa town where he worked by four people in plainclothes carrying handcuffs on April 8, 2015. The incident was captured on CCTV cameras installed in the shop and aired on local TV stations. The matter was reported to Garissa Police station where the footage from the CCTV cameras was also handed to police. Police at Garissa Police station allegedly told those reporting his arrest that he was in the custody of military intelligence. His whereabouts remain unknown.

30. Mohamed Mohamud Musa, 23 years old

A money changer at the Kenya- Somali border in Mandera, he was arrested at around 10am on April 9, 2015 by people who did not identify themselves. According to eyewitnesses, the two were last seen being taken to Mandera military camp by a combined team of officers in plainclothes and others in Administration Police uniforms. His whereabouts remain unknown.

31. Siyat Rage, 40 years old

Was arrested at around 10am on April 9, 2015 from a restaurant where he worked in Garissa Ndogo neighborhood in the outskirts of Garissa town by plainclothes security agents driving a vehicle with the official government of Kenya registration plates. Some eyewitnesses asserted that the arresting officials were known to be members of the ATPU and military intelligence. His whereabouts remain unknown. The incident was reported to Garissa Police station the same day but no further information has been forthcoming.

32. Ali Warsame, 35 years old

Uniformed officers from the Kenya Police Reservists arrested Ali Warsame from Urale market, Wajir town, on April 9, 2015. He was handed over to the Commander of the Rapid Deployment Unit in Wajir, a Mr Mohamed Sheikh aka Hambarsade, who is now the County Commander of Administration Police in Wajir, and KDF officers. The whereabouts of Ali Warsame remain unknown.

33. Ali Duale Keynan, 21 years old

Five security officers in plain clothes arrested Ali Duale Keynan from a cyber café in Wagbare area in Wajir town on April 14, 2015. The five were driving two vehicles: one was a white Toyota Hilux Pickup with no registration number plates. Several eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that this vehicle is known in Wajir town to be used by Border Patrol Unit Police officers. The other was a white Toyota Land Cruiser, also without registration number plates, known in Wajir town to be used by the ATPU. Human Rights Watch was also told that Mr Mohamed Sheikh, a senior superintendent of police attached to the Rapid Deployment Unit, was part of the team that arrested Ali Duale Keynan. The whereabouts of Ali Duale remain unknown.

34. Mr Mahat Ahmed, 38 years old, Mr Ismail Mohamed, 23 years old, Ms Rahma Ali, 24 years and Ms Anab Abdullahi, 25 years old.

The four men and women were picked up from their houses in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa town, by suspected security officers who were armed, with some wearing plainclothes and others military uniforms, on April 20, 2015. The matter was reported at Garissa Police station but the whereabouts of the four remain unknown.

35. Abdifatah Othowa Adan, 30 years old

A manager with E-Coach Bus Service, Abdifatah was picked up from Kilimanjaro Hotel in Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood on April 20, 2015. The people who picked him showed identification cards from the National Intelligence Service. The matter was reported both at Garissa police station and in Nairobi’s Pangani police station and later raised in parliament by Wajir West legislator, Abdikadir Ore Ahmed. Abdifatah’s whereabouts remain unknown.

36. Abdilatif Abdimalik, 18 years old

He was picked up at night together with his elder brother, Abdimalik, from their house in Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa town, around April 25, 2013 by more than 50 uniformed officers who introduced themselves as police. Abdimalik ’s body was found in Thika three days later, but the whereabouts of Abdilatif remain unknown.

37. Omar Yusuf Mohamed, 26 years old

Was arrested from Baquli restaurant in Mandera town during the day on April 26, 2015 by several security officers, among them three CID officers familiar to the residents of Mandera. His case was reported to Mandera Police Station and recorded as missing person under OB No 29/05/05/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown. Omar Yusuf had previously been arrested by the ATPU in August 2014 and held at the ATPU offices in Upper Hill, Nairobi, where he was interrogated for 20 days and released, according to witnesses.

38. Hussein Ali Abdullahi, 46 years old

He was arrested from his retail shop in the middle of Wajir town, next to the Chief’s camp, on May 8, 2015 by plain clothes security officers driving a black truck with the Government of Kenya insignia. Three men, some of whom were identified by witnesses as police officers attached to the Border Patrol Unit, came out of the truck, arrested Hussein, and took him into custody. Other witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the police took Hussein to Wajir Military camp, where he was being held for at least five days but his current whereabouts remain unknown.

39. Abdinasir Ahmed Mohamed, 30 years old

A bus conductor who was last seen on May 20, 2015 in the custody of KDF officers who took him to Mandera military camp where he was detained for 15 days. He was then released and handed over to the Mandera Police Station, reportedly unable to walk. Witnesses say he was last seen at the police station with Border Patrol Police officers. His whereabouts since then are not known.

40. Sheikh Ibrahim Bilkan Ayilow, 26, and Mohamed Abdullahi, 35 years old

Three people who did not identify themselves arrested Ibrahim and Mohamed from a mosque in Embakasi, Nairobi, on June 10, 2015. Those who arrested them are suspected to have been security officers because they had pistols and handcuffs and did not appear interested in stealing anything. The whereabouts of the two remain unknown.

41. Farah Ibrahim Korio, 45 years old

He was arrested on June 30, 2015 inside Wajir Police station where he had gone to record a statement about unknown people who were inquiring after him. The three plain clothed men who arrested him inside the police station introduced themselves as military intelligence officers. They first held Farah briefly inside the ATPU offices at Wajir Police station before driving in the direction of Wajir military camp. The matter was reported to Wajir police station under OB No 36/29/06/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown.

42. Ms Asha Abdi Abdisalan Abdullahi, 30 years old

Originally a resident of Garissa’s Taqwa neighborhood, she was picked up from her house on 12th Street, Eastleigh, by a team of Administration police officers and some plain clothes officers suspected to be military intelligence officers on July 17, 2015. She was driven away in a white Toyota Probox, KCC 406Y. The matter was reported at Pangani Police Station under OB No. 56/29/07/2015. Her whereabouts remain unknown.

43. Abdirizak Mohamed Haji, 29 years old

Ten officers who introduced themselves as KDF based in Somalia arrested Abdirizak from his parent’s house in Mandera East on the night of October 24, 2015. The matter of his disappearance was reported to Mandera Police Station under OB No 21/09/12/2015. His whereabouts remain unknown.

44. Mahat Isaak, 30 years old

He was arrested around April 20, 2015 by people suspected to be military officers and taken to Wajir military camp for interrogation. The matter was reported to Wajir police station but the whereabouts of Mahat Isaak remain unknown.

Letter to KWS

March 23, 2016

Mr. Kitili Mbathi,

The Director General,

Kenya Wildlife Service,

Head Office, Langata,

P.O Box 40241 – 00100,

Nairobi (Kenya).

Tel: +254 (20) 2379407

Email:

Dear Sir,

I am writing to solicit your views and input regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the North Eastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years.

As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international nongovernmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective.

We recognize that you only just recently assumed office. Given the breadth of our work in Kenya and the recent role of KWS in Lamu and Tana River in 2014 and now in the ongoing operations in north eastern Kenya, we would very much appreciate an opportunity to meet and discuss our ongoing concerns for human rights abuses in Kenya.

We seek your response to some queries regarding the role of the KWS in law enforcement operations in northeast and some information regarding specific cases.

1. On what legal basis is the KWS involved in law enforcement operations in northeast and how does KWS coordinate with the police and KDF? Who is responsible for the operations when KWS officers are deployed for such operations?

2. We are concerned about allegations regarding the possible involvement of KWS officers in the arrest of Mohamed Farah Muhumed, 42, Siad Mahat Ahmed, 23, and Sugu Apkea, 40 years old. The three were arrested in February of 2014 by more than 10 armed Kenya Wildlife Service rangers from Bula Tawakal, Garissa. Their whereabouts remain unknown. We would appreciate any information you can provide on the whereabouts, legal status and health of these individuals.

3. We remain concerned that there are numerous allegations of disappearances in north east Kenya. Under international law, an enforced disappearance occurs when someone is deprived of their liberty by agents of the state or those acting with its acquiescence, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person. We would appreciate any further insights or information you may have about enforced disappearances in northeastern Kenya and the deprivation of liberty of suspects.

Your response to the attached inquiry is especially important so that we can accurately reflect your views in our forthcoming research on detentions in Kenya. In order for us to include your response in our work, we would very much appreciate a written answer to the attached questions by April 25, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:…We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us. Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response at your convenience, prior to April 25.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Annex 3: KWS Response to HRW Letter

Annex 3

Annex 4: Letters to Cabinet Secretaries

Letter to Ministry of Defense

April 27, 2016

Raychelle Awuor Omamo,

The Cabinet Secretary,
Ministry of Defense,
Ulinzi House
Lenana Road
P O Box 40668 – 00100
Nairobi
Tel: 2721100 | Fax:2737322

E-Mail:

Dear Madam,

I am writing to draw your attention to a letter that Human Rights Watch wrote to the Chief of Kenya Defense Forces on March 23 regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the northeastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years. A copy of the letter to the Chief of KDF is herein attached.

As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international non-governmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective and has worked in Kenya for many years.

Thus far, we have not received a reply from the KDF regarding our queries. We are reaching out to your office to request your assistance in ensuring a response to the human rights concerns in the letter.

A response to our inquiry is especially important so that we can accurately reflect government efforts in addressing these human rights concerns in our forthcoming research on northeastern Kenya. We would very much appreciate an answer on or before May 30, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:... Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response at your convenience, prior to May 30.

We look forward to dialogue with the KDF and your office regarding our research in northeast as well as other areas of mutual concern, such as the situation in Somalia. We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Letter to Ministry of Interior and National Coordination

April 27, 2016

Joseph Kasaine Ole Nkaissery,

The Cabinet Secretary,

Interior and National Coordination,

The State Department of Interior,

Harambee House, Harambee Avenue

P.O Box 30510 – 00100

Nairobi

Tel: +254 – 20 – 2227411

Email:

Dear Sir,

I am writing to draw your attention to a letter that Human Rights Watch wrote to the Inspector General of Police on March 23 regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the northeastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years. A copy of the letter to the Inspector General is herein attached.

As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international non-governmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective and has worked in Kenya for many years.

Thus far, we have not received a reply from the police regarding our queries. We are reaching out to your office to request your assistance in ensuring a response to the human rights concerns in the letter.

A response to our inquiry is especially important so that we can accurately reflect government efforts in addressing these human rights concerns in our forthcoming research on northeastern Kenya. We would very much appreciate an answer on or before May 30, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:... Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response at your convenience, prior to May 30.

We look forward to dialogue with the police and your office regarding our research in northeast as well as other areas of mutual concern, such as police and human rights in Kenya. We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Letter to Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Regional Development Authorities

April 27, 2016

Prof Judy Wangalwa Wakhungu,

The Cabinet Secretary,

Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and
Regional Development Authorities,

NHIF Building, 12th Floor,

Ragati Road, Upper Hill

P.O Box 30126 – 00100

Nairobi (Kenya)

Tel: 254 20 2730 808/9

+254 20 272 57 07

Dear Madam,

I am writing to draw your attention to a letter that Human Rights Watch wrote to the Director General of the Kenya Wildlife Services on March 23 regarding our ongoing research on human rights abuses in the northeastern counties of Garissa, Wajir and Mandera over the last two years. A copy of the letter to the Director General is herein attached.

As you may know, Human Rights Watch is an international non-governmental organization that documents human rights abuses in more than 90 countries around the world. Human Rights Watch is committed to producing material that is comprehensively documented, verified, and objective and has worked in Kenya for many years.

Thus far, we have not received a reply from the KWS regarding our queries. We are reaching out to your office to request your assistance in ensuring a response to the human rights concerns in the letter.

A response to our inquiry is especially important so that we can accurately reflect government efforts in addressing these human rights concerns in our forthcoming research on northeastern Kenya. We would very much appreciate an answer on or before May 30, 2016.

Please communicate your response to Maria Burnett at:... Alternatively, we would be happy to collect a written response at your convenience, prior to May 30.

We look forward to dialogue with the KWS and your office regarding our research in northeast as well as other areas of mutual concern, such as the situation in northeastern Kenya. We would also be pleased to discuss the research findings in person should you be available to meet with us.

Sincerely,

Leslie Lefkow

Deputy Director - Africa

Human Rights Watch

Amsterdam, Netherlands

[1] Daniel Howden, “Kenya sends in troops to Somalia in pursuit of Al-Shabab militants,” Independent, October 16, 2011,http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/kenya-sends-in-troops-to-... (last accessed My 26, 2016).

[2] Robert Reich, “Kenya Aid Workers Kidnapping: Country Will Track Al-Shabab in Somalia,’ Huffington Post, October 15, 2011 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/15/kenya-aid-workers-kidnapping_n_... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[3]“Israel – Kenya deal to help fight Somalia’s Al-Shabab,” BBC, November 14, 2011 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-15725632. “Why Am I Still Here? The 2007 Horn of Africa Renditions and the Fate of Those Still Missing,” Human Rights Watch, October 2008. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/eastafrica1008web.pdf (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[4]Even before Kenyan forces entered Somalia in late 2011, Kenya was known to be supporting at least two Somali militia groups fighting Al-Shabab for territory in southern Somalia. The proxy war across the border did not appear to be as effective as had been projected, especially with gun and grenade attacks on the rise inside Kenya and other neighboring countries. Kenyan leaders increasingly came under local and international pressure to help curb cross-border activities of Al-Shabab to improve security.In June 2014, for example, following Al-Shabab’s attack on Mpeketoni Centre in the coastal town of Lamu, Al-Shabab officially declared Kenya a warzone and warned about the Kenyan military's continued invasion and occupation of our Muslim lands and the massacre of innocent Muslims in Somalia. To the tourists visiting Kenya we say this: Kenya is now officially a war zone and as such any tourists visiting the country do so at their own peril.”Athman Omar, Zoe Flood and David Smith, “Kenya is a war zone, warns Al-Shabab after Somali Islamists massacre 48,” Guardian, June 16, 2014 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/16/kenya-war-zone-alshabaab-is... accessed May 26, 2016).

[5]“Terrorist Attacks in Kenya Reveal Domestic Radicalisation,” Combating Terrorism Centre, US Military Academy, October 29, 2012, https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/terrorist-attacks-in-kenya-reveal-domesti... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[6] In 2007, the African Union Peace and Security Council deployed a regional peace support force to Somalia mandated by the UN Security Council and supported by the AU’s Peace and Security Operations Division to provide protection for Somali government officials and infrastructure and contribute to the secure delivery of humanitarian assistance. Since then, AMISOM’s mandate, size, and geographical presence have all steadily increased.See UNSecurity Council, Resolution 1744 (2007), S/RES/1744 (2007),http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/sc8960.doc.htm(last accessed May 26, 2016), and Trevor Analo, “Somalia: To Leave KDF in Somalia or Not? That is the question but all agree on the terror threat, East African, September 7, 2015 http://allafrica.com/stories/201509071727.html (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[7]Paul Cruickshank, “Al-Shabab breaks new ground with complex Nairobi attack,” CNN, September 23, 2013. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/22/world/meast/kenya-mall-al-shabaab-anal... (accessed May 26, 2016). See also, Brigite Rohwerder, “Conflict Analysis of Kenya,” University of Birmingham, May 2015. http://www.gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/KenyaConflictAnalysis.pdf (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[8] Daniel Howden, “Terror in Nairobi: The full story behind Al-Shababa’s mall attack,” The Guardian, October 4, 2013 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/04/westgate-mall-attacks-kenya (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[9] Al-Shabab ordered residents of Mpeketoni to cite an Islamic creed as proof they were Muslim and killed those who failed to recite it.

[10]“Kenya attack: Mpeketoni near Lamu hit by Al-Shabab raid,” BBC, June 16, 2014 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27862510 (last accessed May 26, 2016). “Insult To Injury: The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive Response,” Human Rights Watch and Kenya Human Rights Commission, June 15, 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/06/15/insult-injury/2014-lamu-and-tana-r... (last accessed July 6, 2016). “IPOA Report Following Mpeketoni Attacks,” Redacted Version, section 5.0.7, Independent Policing Oversight Authority, September 2014 http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/MpeketoniAttack... (last accessed July 6, 2016).

[11]“Al-Shabab massacres 28 Kenya bus passengers,” Al Jazeera, November 23, 2014 http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2014/11/killed-kenya-bus-attack-201... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[12]“Gunmen kill 36 quarry workers,” Deutchweller News, December 2, 2014 http://www.dw.com/en/gunmen-kill-36-kenya-quarry-workers/a-18105000 (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[13] Jessica Hatcher and Kevin Sief, “Al-Shabab attacks Kenyan University, killing at least 147,” Washington Post, April 2, 2015 https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/70-killed-hundreds-rescued-a... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[14]“Al-Shabab massacres 28 Kenyan bus passengers,” Al Jazeera, November 23, 2014 http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2014/11/killed-kenya-bus-attack-201... See also “Kenya attack: Gunmen kill at least 48 people,” The Guardian, June 16, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/16/kenya-attack-gunmen-kill-48... (last accessed May 26, 2016); See also, “Al-Shabab militants claim responsibility for Garissa University attack,” Daily Nation, April 2, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/counties/-Garissa-University-attack-Shabaab/-/11....

[15] Joseph Akwiri, “Somali Islamists Attack Kenya Military Base, 11 Militants, Two Soldiers Dead,” Reuters, June 14, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-kenya-attack-idUSKBN0OU0D420150614 (Last accessed July 11, 2016); See also Joseph Muraya, “Al-Shabab dares attack on Lamu KDF base, 11 killed,” Capital news, June 14, 2015 (last accessed July 11, 2016). http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/06/al-shabaab-dares-attack-on-lamu-....

[16]“Kenya: Al-Shabab kills Quarry Workers in Mandera Gun Attack,” BBC, July 7, 2015 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-33421902 (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[17]See Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, “Shahada” https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/shahada (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[18]“Kenya: Al-Shabab-Closer to Home,” International Crisis Group, September 25, 2014. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/africa/horn-of-africa/kenya/b10... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[19]Kenya: Al-Shabab Kills Quarry Workers in Mandera Gun Attack,” BBC, July 7, 2015 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-3342190. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/world/africa/kenya-presses-assault-aga... and others (last accessed May 2016). See also Mohamed Yusuf, “Al-Shabab Vows to Fight Inside Kenya,” VOA, May 22, 2014. http://www.voanews.com/content/al-shabab-vows-to-fight-inside-kenya/1920... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[20]“Al-Shabab Vows to Take war to Kenya,” IGIHE, May 2014. http://en.igihe.com/spip.php?page=mv2_article&id_article=14562. See also http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/2013/09/attack-nairobi-highlights-ongo... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[21]“One of the Al-Shabab attackers in Garissa University was a brilliant upcoming lawyer,” Sahan Journal, April 5, 2015. http://sahanjournal.com/one-al-shabaab-attackers-garissa-university-bril... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[22]Helene Cooper, “Pentagon Confirms Strike Killed Shabab militant leader in Somalia,” New York Times, March 18, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/19/us/politics/pentagon-confirms-strike-k... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[23]“Flavie Halais, “Nairobi’s solution to terrorism: Blame the Somalis,” Open Security: Conflict and Peace Building, April 17, 2014. https://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/flavie-halais/nairobis-soluti... (last accessed May 29, 2016). See also, Malkhadir Muhumed, Cracking down on Nairobi’s Somalis,” Al jazeera, April 22, 2014. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/04/cracking-down-nairobi-... (last accessed May 26, 2016). George Okore, “Kenyan Security Forces Accused of Stoking Tensions, IWPR, May 12, 2014. https://iwpr.net/global-voices/kenyan-security-forces-accused-stoking-te... (last accessed May 26, 2016). “Kenya: End Abusive Round –Ups,” Human Rights Watch news release, May 12, 2014. https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/12/kenya-end-abusive-round-ups.

[24]Ralph Ellis, Ben Brumfield and Christian Purefoy, “Five arrested in deadly attack on Kenyan college,” CNN, April 3, 2015. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/03/africa/kenya-garissa-university-attack/. See also, “Five more held in deadly Westgate mall attack on Kenya,” CNN, October 30, 2013. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/30/world/africa/kenya-mall-attack/ (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[25]“UN Concerned by Kenyan threat to close refugee camps,” Reuters, May 9, 2016, http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFKCN0Y01WC (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[26] Paul Wafula, “Kenya has experienced 100 terror related attacks in three years,” The Standard, August 18, 2014 http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000131848/kenya-has-experienced-... (last accessed April 12, 2016). Adow Mohamed, “Why Kenya’s Counter Terrorism Strategy is Failing,” The Star, September 16, 2015. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2015/09/16/why-kenyas-counter-terrorism-s.... Nanjala Nyabola, “Closing Dadaab,” The Rift Valley Institute, 2015. http://riftvalley.net/publication/closing-dadaab#.V2gXtE32bIU (Last accessed June 20, 2016); Africa Focus, “Kenya: Refugee Crackdown Counterproductive,” March 19, 2014. http://allafrica.com/stories/201405210995.html (last accessed June 20, 2016).

[27]“We are tired of taking you to court: Human Rights Abuses By Kenya’s Anti-Terrorism Police Unit,” Muslims for Human Rights and Open Society Justice Initiative, November 20, 2013 https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/were-tired-taking-you-cou... (last accessed April 12, 2016).

[28]“Kenya: Killings, Disappearances By The Anti-Terror Police,” Human Rights Watch press release, August 18, 2014 https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/08/18/kenya-killings-disappearances-anti-t... (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[29]“Kenya: End Abusive round-ups,” Human Rights Watch press release, May 12, 2014. https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/12/kenya-end-abusive-round-ups (last accessed May 26, 2016).

[30]Human Rights Watch interviews with multiple Somali refugees during Usalama Watch operation, Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood, June 15 and 22, 2014.

[31]“Kenya: Halt Crackdown on Somalis,” Human Rights Watch press release, April 11, 2014 https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/04/11/kenya-halt-crackdown-somalis (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[32]“Kenya: End Abusive Round – ups,” Human Rights Watch press release, May 12, 2014 https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/12/kenya-end-abusive-round-ups (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[33]The Constitution of Kenya 2010, Chapter 14, Articles 243, 244 and 245. The Administration Police is a unit created by British colonial authorities before Kenya’s independence in the early 1960s to support the now defunct provincial administration. Attempts to merge the Administration and regular police succeeded only partially due to internal resistance from the Administration Police. SeeAdministration Police Service, The history and mandate, service website http://www.administrationpolice.go.ke/2015-02-16-09-14-42/history.html (last accessed May 27, 2016)“Insult to Injury: The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive Response,” Human Rights Watch report, June 15, 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/06/15/insult-injury/2014-lamu-and-tana-r... (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[34] The Special Issue, Kenya Gazette Supplement No 167 (Acts No.19), Republic of Kenya, December 22, 2014 http://counterterrorism.go.ke/downloads/NCTC_Establishment.pdf (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[35] According to the Security Laws Amendment Act of December 22, 2014 which created the Centre, NCTC is comprised of the director appointed by the National Security Council, National Intelligence Service, Kenya Defense Forces, the Attorney General, the Directorate of Immigration and Registration, the National Police Service and any other agencies that may be determined by the National Security Council.

[36]See Chapter 14, article 240 (3) on the Establishment of the National Security Council.

[37] Human Rights Watch interviews with a police officer, Wajir town, September 22, 2015 and a military officer, Mandera, September 9, 2015. Article 240 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 provides for membership of the National Security Council as the president, deputy president, the cabinet secretary for defense, cabinet secretary for foreign affairs, cabinet secretary for interior and national coordination, Attorney General, Chief of Kenya Defense Forces, director general of the National Intelligence Service and Inspector General of the Kenya Police Service.

[38]Human Rights Watch interviews with W.M., and U.M., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[39]Kenya Police Service Act, 2011, Part IV, Articles 28 – 29.

[40]“Kenya: Killings, disappearances by the anti-terror police,” Human Rights Watch press release, August 18, 2014 https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/08/18/kenya-killings-disappearances-anti-terror-police (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[41]Human Rights Watch interviews with P.O., and H.D., Wajir town, October 18 and 20, 2015.

[42]Human Rights Watch interviews with K.L., and V.L., Garissa town, July 21, 2015 and with Q.R., Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood, November 17, 2015.

[43]Human Rights Watch interviews with K.V., and H.D., Wajir town, October 19, 2015 and with B.U., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[44]Human Rights Watch interviews with P.K., R.K., and B.V., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa county, September 11, 2015.

[45] The National Service Act, articles 110- 115, provide for the establishment of the National Police Reserves to be recruited by the National Police Service Commission on short renewable contracts of up to two years to support police on security matters in specific regions.

[46] Human Rights Watch interview with P.O., Wajir town September 18, 2015; interview with H.D., Garissa town, October 16, 2015;with K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015; with Q.R., Eastleigh, Nairobi, November 17, 2015 and with N.D., Nairobi town, February 25, 2016.

[47]“Breaking: Charles Mwai appointed the acting director of military intelligence to replace Kameru Wachira,” Kenya Today, September 13, 2014 http://www.kenya-today.com/news/brigadier-charles-mwai-appointed-ag-dire... (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[48]Human Rights Watch interviews with B.U., and D.K., Wajir town, October 22, 2015.

[49]Ibid.

[50]Human Rights Watch interviews with D.K., Wajir town, October 22, 2015 and with M.O., and Y.U., Mandera town, December 8 and 9, 2015.

[51] Human Rights Watch interviews with D.S., Garissa town, September 18, 2015 and with U.V., Wajir town, October 20, 2015.

[52]The director general is interviewed by the board of KWS but officially appointed by the Cabinet Secretary of Environment and Natural resources, which is currently the line ministry, in consultation with the office of the president. In the past, however, KWS was under the office of the president.

[53]Human Rights Watch interviews with A.A., Garissa town, September 10, 2015; with U.V., Garissa town, September 17, 2015; with P.O., Wajir town, October 22, 2015; with K.L., Mandera town, December 8, 2015 and interview with K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[54]National Police Service Act, 2011, Cap.84, section 57 (5) (a).

[55] In a few cases, they would introduce themselves as Kenyan security, or even where they did not, ended up driving with suspects to military facilities. In some cases, those who were released told Human Rights Watch they were being held in military facilities together with others.

[56]Human Rights Watch interviews with H.D., and D.B., Wajir town, October 23, 2015 and with F.D., Garissa town, September 19, 2015.

[57]Human Rights Watch interviews with R.V, Garissa town, September 19, 2015; with P.U, Wajir town, October 22, 2015 and a M.S., Mandera, December 9, 2015, respectively.

[58]Human Rights Watch interview with R.V., Wajir county, October 23, 2015 and with Q.R., Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood, November 17, 2015.

[59]Human Rights Watch interviews with R.V., P.U., and P.O., Wajir county, October 22, 2015. For example, the registration plate number KBZ 409L has regularly been seen on a white Toyota four-wheel drive LandCruiser, which was used in the arrest of Farah Ibrahim Korio at Wajir police station. But the same plate number has also been seen on a white Toyota Probox saloon car. Multiple witnesses also told Human Rights Watch the same registration plate has also been seen on a white sedan in Wajir town.

 

[60]Human Rights Watch interview with H.D., Wajir county, October 23, 2015 and D.I., Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood, November 17, 2015.

[61]Human Rights Watch interview with a man interrogated from a forest 10 kilometers from Wajir town, Wajir town, October 19, 2015. In two cases in Wajir and three cases in Mandera, Human Rights Watch heard evidence indicating that security officers took their detainees to forests for interrogations. Those interviewed said they were interrogated in the forest along with many other suspects. Human Rights Watch interview with P.O., Wajir town, October 20, 2015, M.O., Mandera town, December 9, 2015, and with S.M., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[62]Human Rights Watch interviews with V.D., Wajir town, October 19, 2015 and U.M., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[63]Human Rights Watch interview with U.M., Nairobi town, July 21, 2015 and a man whose relative is missing, Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[64]Human Rights Watch interviews with P.O., in the outskirts of Wajir town, September 20, 2015 and with S.D., Wajir town, September 18, 2015.

[65]Human Rights Watch interviews with Y.H., M.O., and S.M., Mandera County, December 9, 2015. At least one person who was allegedly tortured by the military in Mandera had been reported to the military officers as an Al-Shabab sympathizer in what looked like an attempt by some members of the community to settle a personal score. The military officers targeted the individual without adequately verifying his identity or the reason for the allegations against him.

[66]Human Rights Watch interview with M.O., Mandera town, December 9, 2015 and with P.O., Wajir town, September 20, 2015.

[67]Human Rights Watch interviews with W.M., Mandera town, December 9, 2015 and P.O., Wajir town, September 20, 2015.

[68]UN General Assembly, Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance,

18 December 1992, A/RES/47/133.http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CED/Pages/ConventionCED.aspx. Signing a treaty creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty. See Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties, art. 18. See also, Section 33 of the Criminal Procedure Code, read along with article 49 of the Constitution, require police to take those arrested without an arrest warrant to court within 24 hours (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[69]Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, “Error of Fighting Terror with Terror,” pp 18, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[70]Human Rights Watch interview with U.M., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[71] Human Rights Watch interview with K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[72]Human Rights Watch interview with U.M., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[73]Human Rights Watch interview with M.O., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[74]Human Rights Watch interview with K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[75]An Occurrence Book (OB) is the official book within the police station where officers record what happened, including the arrests made, during the hours they were on duty. In the case of arrests, it is useful in determining who was being held at the station at any one was given time and the offence for which they were being held. It is also an official record of complaints made to police requiring action.

[76]Human Rights Watch joint interview with M.O., W.M., and U.M,, Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[77]Human Rights Watch interview with F.K., Mandera, December 8, 2015.

[78]Human Rights Watch interview with O.R., Eastleigh, November 17, 2015 and W.M, Mandera, December 9, 2015; Human Rights Watch phone interview with a M.N., July 27, 2015.

[79]Human Rights Watch interview with Q.R., Eastleigh neighborhood, Nairobi, November 17, 2015.

[80]Human Rights Watch interview with F.K., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[81]See the habeas corpus application for Omar Yusuf Mohamed, the High Court of Kenya, On file with Human Rights Watch; Also see “The Error of Fighting Terror with Terror” p. 17, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015 (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[82]Human Rights Watch interview with O.R., Eastleigh neighborhood, Nairobi, November 18, 2016.

[83]Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, “Error of Fighting Terror with Terror” p 17, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (accessed May 27, 2016). See Also, Catrina Stewart, “Kenyan Police Murdering Terror Suspects as they battle menace of Al-Shabab Islamist group,” The Independent, September 15, 2015. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/kenya-police-murdering-te... (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[84] Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, “Error of Fighting Terror with Terror, p 17,, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea....

[85]Human Rights Watch interview with R.D., Mandera, December 8, 2015. Omar’s family also started a Twitter hashtag, #WhereisOmar, to bring attention to the case, which gained some coverage in the media. See https://twitter.com/heart_cooler_/status/616902690946306048 (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[86]Human Rights Watch phone interview with D.S., January 17, 2016.

[87]Human Rights Watch interview with Q.R., a relative, Mandera town, December 8, 2015. Also, this is a violation of his constitutional rights under Article 49 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 on the rights of accused persons, which requires suspects to be brought before court within 24 hours of arrest.

[88] Human Rights Watch interview with Q.R., Mandera, December 8, 2015.

[89]Human Rights Watch phone interview with N.D., January 25, 2016. See also “The Error of Fighting Terror with Terror,” pp 18 Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed May 27, 2016).

[90]Human Rights Watch phone interview with D.S., January 17, 2015.

[91]Human Rights Watch interview with Q.R., Mandera, December 9, 2015.

[92]Human Rights Watch phone interview with D.S., January 17, 2016.

[93]Human Rights Watch phone interview with N.D., January 25, 2016.

[94]Ibid.

[95]Ibid.

[96]Human Rights Watch interview with K.L., and V.L,, Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, September 10, 2015.

[97]Human Rights Watch interview with B.O., and K.L., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, September 10, 2015.

[98]Human Rights Watch interview with B.B., and K.L, Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa town, September 10, 2015; interview with R.L., Wajir town, October 20, 2015.

[99]Human Rights Watch interview with M.N.,Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa county, September 10, 2015.

[100]Human Rights Watch interview with B.B., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, September 10, 2015.

[101]Human Rights Watch interview with B.R., Garissa town, September 17, 2015.

[102]Human Rights Watch interview with G.F., Garissa town, September 17, 2015.

[103]Human Rights Watch interview with B.K., Garissa town, September 10, 2015; with K.E., Wajir town, October 22, 2015 and with R.V., December 8, 2015.

[104]Human Rights Watch interview with B.K., Soko Ng’ombe market, Garissa town, September 17, 2015.

[105]Human Rights Watch interview with G.F., Garissa town, September 10, 2015 and with T.A, Mandera county, December 8, 2015; Human Rights Watch interview with P.K., and K.E., Wajir county, October 22, 2015.

[106]Human Rights Watch interview with G.G., Garissa town, September 10, 2015.

[107] Human Rights Watch interview with G.F., Garissa town, September 17, 2015.

[108]Human Rights Watch interview with A.A., Garissa county, September 11, 2015.

[109]Human Rights Watch interview with G.R., Bula Tawakal neighborhood, Garissa county, September 11, 2015.

[110]Human Rights Watch interviews with B.D., Danyere village, Garissa county, September 22, 2015; with B.R., Dadaab village, Garissa county, September 23, 2015 and with S.D.N., Danyere village, Garissa county, September 22, 2015.

[111]Human Rights Watch interview with A.A., S.D.N., and G.R., Bula Mzuri, Garissa town, September 11, 2015.

[112]Human Rights Watch interview with A.A., Bula Mzuri neighborhood, Garissa county, September 11, 2015.

[113]Human Rights Watch interview with G.G., and K.L., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa county, September 10, 2015.

[114]Human Rights Watch interview with G.R., Garissa town, September 11, 2015.

[115]See habeas corpus application for Abdifatah Odhowa, The Kenya High Court, Nairobi, May 2015, on file with HRW.

[116]See Parliamentary Hansard, Kenya National Parliament, May 28, 2015.

[117]Human Rights Watch interview with G.R., Garissa town, September 11, 2015.

[118]Human Rights Watch interview with V.A., Wajir town, October18, 2015.

[119]Human Rights Watch interview with C.O., Halane village, Wajir county, October 18, 2015.

[120]Human Rights Watch interview with C.O., Halane village, Wajir county, October 18, 2015.

[121]Human Rights Watch interview with P.K., and C.O., Wajir town, October 18, 2015.

[122] Ibid.

[123]Stephen Astariko, “One held as police fight Wajir gang,” Star newspaper, April 29, 2015. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2015/04/29/one-held-as-police-fight-wajir... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[124]“The Error of fighting terror with terror” pp 9, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[125]“The Error of Fighting Terror with Terror, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[126]Human Rights Watch interview with R.D., Wajir town, October 19, 2015. See also “Error of Fighting Terror with Terror,” p 9, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September, 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[127]Human Rights Watch interview with M.D., Wajir town, September 22, 2015.

[128] Human Rights Watch interview with N.I., Barnako village, Wajir county, October 22, 2015.

[129] The UN Convention Against Torture, which Kenya ratified in 1997, defines torture as “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person or any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in the official capacity.”

[130]Human Rights Watch interview with T.U., outskirts of Garissa town, September 18, 2015.

[131]Human Rights Watch interview with R.S., outskirts of Garissa town, September 17, 2015.

[132]Human Rights Watch interview with F.K., outskirts of Garissa town, September 18, 2015.

[133]Ibid.

[134]Ibid

[135]Human Rights Watch interview with F.E., Wajir town, October 19, 2015.

[136]Human Rights Watch observation of the body of F.E., Wajir town, October 19, 2015.

[137] Human Rights Watch interview with J.V., Wajir town, September 20, 2015.

[138]Human Rights Watch interview with F.E., Wajir town, October 19, 2015.

[139] Human Rights Watch interview with D.U., Wajir town, September 18, 2015.

[140]Human Rights Watch interview with V.T., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[141]Ibid.

[142]Human Rights Watch interview with U.M., December 8, 2015 and with M.O., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[143]Adow Mohamed, “Mass Graves found in Wajir, 11 bodies thought to be of terror suspects found in Lanbib,” The Star, May 1, 2015. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2015/05/01/mass-grave-found-in-wajir-town.... Also see, Manase Otsialo, “Herders stumble on Mandera mass grave,” Daily Nation, December 8, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Police-discover-three-sites-in-Mandera/-/10... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[144]“Concerned citizens raise their voice following discovery of shallow mass graves in Mandera,” NEP Journal, December 7, 2015 http://nepjournal.com/condemnation-continue-to-flow-following-discovery-of-mass-shallow-graves-in-mandera/ (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[145] Adow Mohamed, “Mass Graves Found in Wajir Town, 11 bodies thought to be of terror suspects found in Lanbib,” The Star, May 1, 2015 http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2015/05/01/mass-grave-found-in-wajir-town-11-bodies-thought-to-be-of-terror_c1128018 (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[146]“Outrage as shallow graves with fresh corpses found in Mandera,” The Standard , December 7, 2015 http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000184738/outrage-as-shallow-graves-with-fresh-corpses-found-in-mandera (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[147]Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Grave Claims,” Capital FM, December 9, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... (last accessed May 28, 2016). See also Joseph Muraya, “What Executions? Police Spokesman Asks,” Capital FM online, September 16, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/09/what-executions-kenyas-police-sp...(accessed May 28, 2016).

[148]See State Obligations in Exhumations, Enforced Disappearances Information Exchange Centre, an online collection of information on disappearances, AC Utrecht, Netherlands. http://www.ediec.org/areas/state-obligations/exhumations/ (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[149]See the mortuary records at Mandera General Hospital, photos on Human Rights Watch file. Based on the description of the hospital staff, the numbers could be more, but the mortuary records were badly kept and many pages had either fallen or were falling off while some pages were barely legible.

[150]Human Rights Watch interview with R.U., a staff member at Mandera general hospital, December 8, 2015.

[151] Human Rights Watch interview with R.V., an official at Mandera general hospital, Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[152]The Criminal procedure Act, 1930, Section 385.

[153]Human Rights Watch interview with K.L., Taqwa neighborhood in Garissa county, September 10, 2015.

[154]Human Rights Watch interview with A.A., Garissa town, September 9, 2015.

[155]Human Rights Watch interview with Z.F., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[156] Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Grave Claims,” Capital FM, December 9, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... (last accessed May 29, 2016). See also Joseph Muraya, “What Executions? Police Spokesman Asks,” Capital FM online, September 16, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/09/what-executions-kenyas-police-sp... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[157]Human Rights Watch field observations, Thika-Garissa road, September 7, 12, 17 and 20, 2015.

[158]Human Rights Watch phone interview with N.D., January 25, 2015.

[159] Human Rights Watch interview with N.S., Nairobi, July 27, 2015.

[160]Human Rights Watch interview with D.B., Nairobi town, July 21, 2015 and phone interview with N.D., January 25, 2016.

[161]Human Rights Watch phone interview with N.D., January 25, 2016.

[162]Human Rights Watch interview with X.O., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[163]Ibid.

[164]Human Rights Watch interview with D.X., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[165]Human Rights Watch interview with S.T., Duse village, Mandera, December 8, 2015.

[166]Human Rights Watch interview with X.O., Duse village, Mandera, December 8, 2015.

[167]Human Rights Watch follow up interview with N.S., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[168]Human Rights Watch interview with X.O., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[169] Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Grave Claims,” Capital FM, December 9, 2015 http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[170]Political leaders from the north eastern region, through the County Government of Mandera, secured a court order to exhume the body of Isnina from Duse village where she had been buried for medical examination, which was done by the graveside. Human Rights Watch and other human rights organizations were present during the postmortem.

[171]See a medical examination report into the death of Isnina Musa Sheikh as conducted on December 8, 2015 by the Independent Medico Legal Unit, on file with HRW.

[172]Human Rights Watch interview with Y.H., and Z.H., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[173]Human Rights Watch interview with Z.F,. Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[174]Human Rights Watch interviews withZ.F., Q.F., and K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[175]Ibid.

[176]Human Rights Watch interview with R.V., Mandera General Hospital, Mandera, December 8, 2015.

[177] Human Rights Watch follow up interview with N.S., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[178]Human Rights Watch interview with K.L., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, September 10, 2015.

[179] Human Rights Watch phone interview with D.B., July 21, 2015.

[180]Human Rights Watch interview with K.L., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa, September 10, 2015.

[181]Human Rights Watch interview with B.F., Garissa town, September 11, 2015.

[182]Human Rights Watch interview with L.M., Wajir town, October 21, 2015 and P.Q., Nairobi town, November 17, 2015.

[183]Human Rights Watch interview with L.M., Wajir town, September 22, 2015.

[184]Ibid.

[185]Human Rights Watch interview with L.M., Wajir town, September 22, 2015.

[186] Human Rights Watch interview with Q.R., Nairobi’s Eastleigh neighborhood, November 18, 2015.

[187]See the records of the Nairobi City Mortuary, June 25, 2014.

[188] Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Mass Grave Claims,” Capital FM, December 9, 2015 http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[189]Human Rights Watch interview with F.G., an AlJazeera journalist who has regularly reported on killings and disappearances in north east, Garissa town, July 21, 2015.

[190]Ibid.

[191]Human Rights Watch interview with B.O., Garissa town, September 9, 2015.

[192]Section 384.

[193]See Section 386 (1), (a), (b), (c), (d) of the Kenya Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 75, 1930.

[194]Human Rights Watch interview G.R., Bula Mzuri village, Garissa, September 11, 2015, Human Rights Watch interview with G.F., Garissa Ndogo village, Garissa town, September 17, 2015. Human Rights Watch interview with L.M., Wajir town, October 23, 2015; Human Rights Watch interview with T.A., Mandera town, December 8, 2015.

[195]Human Rights Watch interview with R.G., Garissa Ndogo neighborhood, September 8, 2015.

[196]See Section 50 (3) and (4) of the Kenya Police Service Act, 2011.

[197]“Error of Fighting Terror with Terror,” Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed may 29, 2016).

[198] Joseph Muraya, “What Executions? Police Spokesman Asks,” Capital FM online, September 16, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/09/what-executions-kenyas-police-sp... (last accessed may 29, 2016).

[199] Joseph Muraya, “What Executions? Police Spokesman Asks,” Capital FM online, September 16, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/09/what-executions-kenyas-police-sp... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[200]Joseph Muraya, “What Executions? Police Spokesman Asks,” Capital FM online, September 16, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/09/what-executions-kenyas-police-sp... (last accessed may 29, 2016).

[201]“Members of Kenya’s counterterrorism police admit to eliminating radical Muslims,” Aljazeera Investigates, December 7, 2014 http://www.jamiiforums.com/threads/al-jazeeras-investigative-unit-kenyan... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[202]Presidential Service Communications Unit, “Uhuru Says Claims Against KDF Ridiculous, Assures Support,” Daily Nation, November 14, 2015 http://www.nation.co.ke/news/politics/Uhuru-says-claims-against-KDF-ridi... (last accessed May 28, 2016). This was in reference to a report by The Journalists for Justice, whose investigations echoed previous allegations of the United Nations Monitoring Group in Somalia and Eritrea that the KDF was collaborating with Al-Shabab in a multibillion shilling charcoal trade in Somalia. The full report is available here: http://www.jfjustice.net/userfiles/file/Research/Black%20and%20White%20K... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[203]“You must apologise! Nkaissery tells Mandera leaders over mass grave claims,” K24 news, December 9, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asFOvfVrh2s (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[204] Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Mass Grave Claims,” Capital FM Online, December 9, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... (last accessed May 28, 2016). See also “Nkaissery Furious over Mandera grave claims,” Citizen TV, December 9, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4wC8Z910q0 (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[205] Joseph Muraya, “Nkaissery Furious Over Mandera Mass Grave Claims,” Capital FM Online, December 9, 2015.http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2015/12/nkaissery-furious-over-mandera-g... also “Nkaissery Furious over Mandera grave claims,” Citizen TV, December 9, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4wC8Z910q0 (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[206]Aggrey Mutambo, “Senator Kerow, three MPs arrested in Mandera mass graves saga,” The Daily Nation, December 11, 2015. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/lifestyle/article/2000059178/only-god-can... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[207]Angira Zadock, “Police did not dig up any more bodies during search at 15 sites, Daily Nation, December 9, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Police-chief-says-no-bodies-in-Mandera-grav... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[208]Zadock Angira, “Senator Billow Kerrow, Three MPs arrested over Mandera Mass Grave Claims,” Daily Nation, December 10, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Senator-Kerrow-three-MPs-arrested/-/1056/29... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[209]“Kenya investigates Aljazeera over “death squads” report”, BBC, December 10, 2014. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-30406061 (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[210]“Kenya to probe Aljazeera on death squad story,” Sapa news, December 10, 2014. http://www.enca.com/africa/kenya-probe-al-jazeera-death-squad-story (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[211]Human Rights Watch interviews with A.A., and K.L,, Garissa town, September 17, 2015, V.T., Mandera town, December 9, 2015 and R.C., Wajir town, October 20, 2015

[212]Human Rights Watch interview with U.M., and V.T., Mandera town, December 9, 2015; interview with T.U., Taqwa neighborhood, Garissa county, September 18, 2015.

[213]Human Rights Watch interview with D.R., and D.K., Garissa town, September 10 & 11 and with K.K., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[214]Human Rights Watch interview with B.V., and R.M., Garissa town, September 8, 2015; A.A., and F.E., Wajir town, October 18, 2015and V.T., Mandera town, December 9, 2015.

[215]Local Policing Accountability in Kenya: Challenges and Opportunities for Action,” Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies and African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum, 2014. http://www.chrips.or.ke/docs/publications/local-policing-accountability-... (accessed May 28, 2016). In August 2014, Human Rights Watch documented 10 cases of extrajudicial killings and another 10 cases of enforced disappearances in Nairobi by the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit. The Human Rights Watch research came within months of a similar report by Open Society Justice Initiative and Muslims for Human Rights (MUHURI) on disappearances and extrajudicial killings at the coast – again implicating the ATPU. In September 2015, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights report implicated multiple security units in extrajudicial killings and disappearances in the northeast.

[216]John Kiarie, “Is the Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) the new toothless bulldog in town?” The Standard newspaper, February 22, 2014. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000105207/is-the-independent-pol... (last accessed May 28, 2016). See also, Human Rights Watch, World Report 2014; Kenya. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/kenya.

[217]Human Rights Watch and Kenya Human Rights Commission, “Insult to Injury: The 2014 Lamu and Tana River Attacks and Kenya’s Abusive response,” June 2015. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/06/15/insult-injury/2014-lamu-and-tana-r.... See, “We are tired of taking you to court,” Open Society Justice Initiative and Muslims for Human Rights (MUHURI), November 20, 2013. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/were-tired-taking-you-cou...nit (last accessed May 28, 2016). See also, “Error of fighting terror with terror,” Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, September 2015. http://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/CivilAndPoliticalReports/Final%20Disappea... (last accessed may 28, 2016).

[218] Security Research and Information Centre, “Security Sector Reforms in Kenya,” Nairobi, 2013. http://www.srickenya.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92... (accessed May 28, 2016).

[219] See the Kenya Defense Forces Act, 2012. http://www.cickenya.org/index.php/legislation/acts/item/220-kdf-act. See also Kenya Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013. http://www.kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2013/WildlifeCon... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[220] The Independent Policing Oversight Authority Act, Laws of Kenya, No. 35 of 2011, on file with Human Rights Watch.

[221]Human Rights Watch interview with an official of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority, Nairobi town center, May 3, 2015.

[222] Immaculate Akello and Cyrus Ombati, “IPOA Faults Crackdown on Refugees in Eastleigh,” The Standard, July 14, 2014. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000128162/ipoa-faults-crackdown-... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[223] Human Rights Watch, “Kenya: Halt Crackdown on Somalis,” April 11, 2014. https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/04/11/kenya-halt-crackdown-somalis.

[224]“Police officers want IPOA disbanded,” The Citizen Weekly, October 13, 2014. http://weeklycitizennewspaper.blogspot.co.ke/2014/10/police-officers-wan.... See also “Nkaissery wants NPSC, IPOA disbanded,” Smart Kenya, March 28, 2015. http://smartkenya.co.uk/nkaissery-wants-npsc-disbanded/ (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[225] Fred Mukinda, “Experts criticize proposed amendments to police laws,” Daily Nation, October 11, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Experts-criticise-proposed-amendments-to-po... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[226] Fred Mukinda, “Experts criticize proposed amendments to police laws,” Daily Nation, October 11, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Experts-criticise-proposed-amendments-to-po... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[227]“Police deny extrajudicial killings in Mandera,” Tuko News, December 6, 2015. https://tuko.co.ke/74045-police-deny-involvement-mandera-shallow-graves-... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[228] Justus Wanga, “NGOs lose license over terrorism claim,” Daily Nation, May 28, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/NGOs-lose-licences-over-terrorism-claim/-/1... (accessed May 28, 2016). See also, “Kenya: Administrative harassment of Haki Africa, MUHURI and Agency for Peace and development,” FIDH, June 5, 2015. https://www.fidh.org/en/region/Africa/kenya/kenya-administrative-harassm... (last accessed May 28, 2016).

[229] Benard Momanyi, “Plot to weaken police commission revealed,” Capital FM online, March 24, 2015. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2013/03/plot-to-weaken-police-commission... (accessed May 28, 2016). See also, “Rights body opposes changes to police laws,” Kenya National commission on Human Rights, May 30, 2013. http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Rights-body-opposes-changes-to-police... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[230] Commission of Inquiry Act No. 11 of 1962, L.N. 2/1964, L.N. 124/1964, Act No. 21 of 1966, Act No. 29 of 1967,

Act No. 5 of 2010 revised in 2012, section 3 (1).

[231]Parliamentarians have raised concerns that some security agencies refuse to comply with parliamentary summons. See for example, Alphonce Shiundu, “Military, spy agency ignore queries on El Adde attack, refuse to give budget details,” The Standard, May 31, 2016.http://standardmedia.co.ke/article/2000203635/military-spy-agency-ignore... (last accessed July 11, 2016).

[232]UN Commission on Human Rights, “Report of the independent expert to update the set of principles to combat

impunity,” E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1, February 8, 2005.

[233]International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted December 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force March 23, 1976; African [Banjul] Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, adopted June 27, 1981, OAU Doc.CAB/LEG/67/3 rev.5, 21 I.L.M. (1982), entered into force October 21, 1986.

[234]Human Rights Committee, General Comment 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the

Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (2004) , para. 15.

[235]ACCPR No 14668, Article 2 (3), 1966.

[236]Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to

the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13, (2004), arts. 15 & 18.

[237]African Charter, arts. 1 & 7.

[238]Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions: Recommended by Economic and Social Council resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989, E.S.C. res. 1989/65, annex, 1989 U.N. ESCOR Supp.

(No.1) at 52, U.N. Doc E/1989/89 (1989), http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/ArbitraryAndSummary

Executions.aspx (accessed May 29, 2016), principle 15.

[239]Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90, entered into force

July 1, 2002, article 28 (Kenya ratified in March 2005).

[240]UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of

International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, March 21, 2006, adopted by the

60th session of the United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/60/147, paras. 11(c) and 24.

[241]UN Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, October 2,

1997, adopted by the UN Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1, principle 3.

[242]ICCPR, art. 2 (3)(b); Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, March 21, 2006, adopted by the 60th session of the United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/60/147, principle II.3.(d).

[243]International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC),Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), adoptedby the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts in GenevaJune 8, 1977, entered into force December 7, 1979, art. 32, “In the implementation of this Section, the activities of the High Contracting Parties, of the Parties to the conflict and of the international humanitarian organizations mentioned in the Conventions and in this Protocol shall be prompted mainly by the right of families to know the fate of their relatives.”

[244] UN General Assembly, International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, adopted January 12, 2007, G.A. res. 61/177, UN Doc. A/61/177 (2006), entered into force December 23, 2010.

[245] Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Convention against Torture), adopted December 10, 1984, G.A. res. 39/46, annex, 39 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 197, U.N. Doc. A/39/51 (1984), entered into force June 26, 1987.

[246]UN Committee against Torture, General Comment No. 3, Implementation of Article 14 by States Parties, CAT/C/GC/3 (2012), para. 16.

[247]In the case ofQuinteros v. Uruguay, which was brought before the UN Human Rights Committee by the mother of a woman who was allegedly disappeared by members of the Uruguayan military, the Committee recognized, “the anguish and stress caused to the mother by the disappearance of her daughter and by the continuing uncertainty concerning her fate and whereabouts. [The mother] has the right to know what has happened to her daughter. In these respects, she too is a victim of the violations of the Covenant suffered by her daughter in particular, of article 7.” 0 Quinteros v. Uruguay, UN Human Rights Committee, communication no. 107/1981, July 21, 1983, para. 14. The UN Human Rights Committee concluded that the mother was entitled to compensation as a victim for the suffering caused by the failure of the state to provide her with information.

[248] UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, “General Comment on the Right to the Truth in Relation to Enforced Disappearance,” July 22, 2010, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/disappear/docs/GC-right_to_the_trut... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[249]African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, “Principles and Guidelines on the right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance, 2003. http://www.achpr.org/instruments/principles-guidelines-right-fair-trial/.

[250]ACHPR, “The right to be brought promptly before a judicial officer,” section M(3).

[251]ACHPR, “Right to be detained in a place recognised by law,” section M(6).

[252]ACHPR, “Right to be detained in a place recognized by law,” section M(6)(a).

[253]ACHPR, “Legal Aid and legal assistance,” section (H) (a).

[254]Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa, Principle M(1)(h).

[255]The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, art 29(a).

[256]The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, arts 29 (b) – (f). Also, see the National Police Service Act, 2011, the National Police Service Commission Act, 2011 and the Independent Policing Oversight Authority Act, 2011. Under the 2014 Security Laws (Amendment) Act allows police can detain terrorism suspects for 90 days, but only with the permission of the court. The rights of accused persons as outlined under Kenyan and international law remain applicable. Human Rights Watch is not aware of any evidence that police have sought court permission for cases documented in this report. The Security Laws Amendment Act of December 22, 2014. http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/AmendmentActs/2014/Securit...

[257]See the National Police Service Act, signed into law by the president of Kenya in 2011.

[258]National Police Service Act, Section 24 (1), signed into law by the president of Kenya in 2011.

[259]National Police Service Act, Section 40 (7).

[260]National Police Service Act, Section 49 (3).

[261]National Police Service Act, Section 50 (1).

[262]Kenya Defense Forces Act, Section 8 (c), signed into law by the president of Kenya in 2012.

[264]Ambassador Godec Remarks for the Launch of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority Strategic Plan, Kenyatta International Conference Centre, Nairobi, September 11, 2014. http://nairobi.usembassy.gov/ipoa2014.html (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[265]Secretary John Kerry’s remarks during a joint press briefing with President Uhuru Kenyatta ahead of President Obama’s Kenya visit, Nairobi, May 4, 2015. http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/05/241822.htm (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[266]High Commissioner Christian Turner’s speech to Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM) National Conference on Security and countering violent extremism, Nairobi, January 17, 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/counter-violent-extremism-communities-beat-terrorism (last accessed May 29, 2016). In his speech at the SUPKEM National Conference on Security and Countering Violent Extremism, Christian Turner noted that “We also know that respect for human rights is a vital element of this work. As then- Foreign Secretary William Hague said in a speech last year, all of us “must remember that in standing up for freedom, human rights and the rule of law ourselves, we must never use methods that undermine these things. As a democracy we must hold ourselves to the highest standards. This includes being absolutely clear that torture and mistreatment are repugnant, unacceptable and counter-productive. Our bottom line is always that we are determined to uphold the law.” “Measures taken to counter terrorism must be in full compliance with international law, in particular human rights law, refugee law, and international humanitarian law.” EU Counter-terrorism Action Plan for the Horn of Africa and Yemen, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52012JC0024.

[267]“Why Am I Still Here? The 2007 Horn of Africa renditions and the fate of those still missing,” Human Rights Watch, October 2008. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/eastafrica1008web.pdf (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[268]Lauren Ploch Blanchard, “Kenya: Current Issues and US Policy,” Congressional Research Service, February 26, 2013. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/206141.pdf (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[269] Lauren Ploch Blanchard, Kenya, In Focus, Congressional Research Service, July 6, 2016.

[270] Lauren Ploch Blanchard, Kenya, In Focus, Congressional Research Service, July 6, 2016.

[271] See Kenya State Department Assistance from the US government, FY2013 – 2015. And Brian Bender, “Pentagon muscles out State Dept. on foreign aid” Politico, March 23, 2016, http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/general-diplomats-tussle-over-pentagons-growing-military-aid-portfolio-221177 (last accessed July 1, 2016).

[272] Lauren Ploch Blanchard, Kenya, In Focus, Congressional Research Service, July 6, 2016. “The Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs (NADR) account supports a broad range of U.S. national interests by funding critical, security-related programs. NADR programs serve as an important tool for working with foreign nations to reduce transnational threats to America’s security, as well as to mitigate local threats that cause regional instabilities and humanitarian tragedies.” Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs, p. 1 http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/28971.pdf (last accessed May 27, 2016). Foreign Military Financing refers to congressionally appropriated grants given to foreign governments to finance the purchase of American-made weapons, services and training.http://fas.org/asmp/profiles/aid/aidindex.htm.

[273]Leahy Law fact sheet, http://www.humanrights.gov/dyn/03/leahy-fact-sheet/ (last accessed May 29, 2016). The US law, commonly known as the “Leahy Law,” prohibits support to a unit of foreign security forces if the Secretary of State has “credible information” that the unit has committed a “gross violation of human rights.” Once aid is suspended, it can only resume if the recipient government “is taking effective steps to bring the responsible members of the security forces unit to justice.”;

See also, https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/07/11/human-rights-watch-testimony-house-f... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[274]“Killings, Disappearances by the anti-terror police,” Human Rights Watch press release, August 18, 2014. https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/08/18/kenya-killings-disappearances-anti-t... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[275]Human Rights Watch email communication with US government official, Washington DC, June 15, 2016.

[276]According the Congressional Research Service, the US support from the Department of Defense to the KDF was 21 million USD in FY 2013, 28 million USD in FY 2014, and then jumped to 76 million in FY 2015. See also Statement of Lauren Ploch Blanchard, Specialist in African Affairs, Congressional Research Service, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health Hearing: U.S Security Assistance in Africa, June 4, 2015.

[277]Security Governance: 2015 Review, US Department of State, Bureau of African Affairs, March 2, 2016 http://www.state.gov/p/af/rls/2016/253906.htm (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[278]Security Governance: 2015 Review, US Department of State, Bureau of African Affairs, March 2, 2016 http://www.state.gov/p/af/rls/2016/253906.htm (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[279]See “Second High – Level Steering Committee Meeting of the White House’s Security Governance Initiative,” The US Embassy press release, Nairobi, November 16, 2015. http://nairobi.usembassy.gov/pr-111615.html (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[280]Vikram Dodd, “Britain Accused of complicity in Kenyan death squad of terrorism suspects,” December 7, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/07/britain-accused-complicity-.... See also, Stella Cherono, “Kenya on the spot over human rights violations,” November 8, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Kenya-on-the-spot-over-human-rights-violati... (last accessed, May 29, 2016).

[281]Vikram Dodd, “Britain Accused of complicity in Kenyan death squad of terrorism suspects,” December 7, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/07/britain-accused-complicity-... (last accessed, May 29, 2016).

[282]See response to a question in the House of Lords by Baroness Anelay of St Johns to a question by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead, March 21, 2016. “We take human rights very seriously and strongly oppose human rights abuses in all circumstances. We continue to believe that a human rights compliant approach is the most effectiveway to secure long-term peace and stability. Where allegations of abuses have been made, we urge the Kenyan government to fully investigate any credible allegations of non-compliance and hold those responsible to account;See also, “UN Criticises UK Rendition Role, report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism,” 2009. http://oppenheimer.mcgill.ca/UN-criticises-UK-rendition-role?lang=fr (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[283]Response to a question in the House of Lords by Baroness Anelay of St Johns by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead, March 21, 2016.

[284]Ibid. According to Baroness Anelay, UK support to Kenya rose in the subsequent years to 1.49 million USD (1.26 million USD for KDF and 230,000 million USD for police) in 2014/15 and, in the financial year 2015/2016, to 2.13 million USD (1.61 million USD to KDF and 520,000 million USD to police). This does not include money going to KDF in Somalia.

[285]Ibid.

[286]See response to a question in the House of Lords by Baroness Anelay of St Johns to a question by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead, March 21, 2016.

[287]“Fact Sheet: EU’s Work in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda,” https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/factsheet-eu-cooperatio... (last accessed July 5, 2016). EU High Representative to the Members of European Parliament, September 16, 2015. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2015-01... (last accessed July 5, 2016); see also answer given by Vice-President Mogherini on behalf of the Commission, July 15, 2015. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2015-00... (last accessed July 5, 2016). Aggrey Mutambo, “EU parliament recommends antiterrorism mission in Kenya,” Daily Nation, April 29, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/European-Union-supports-anti-terrorism-miss... (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[288] See European Parliament resolution of 30 April 2015 on the persecution of Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabab. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fTEXT....See EU press release, “The European Union announces more than 124 million pounds to increase security in Somalia,” September 9, 2013. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-816_en.htm (accessed May 29, 2016). See also Kevin Kelly, “AU tells security council of grave concern over pay cut for AMISOM soldiers,” The Daily Nation, January 29, 2016. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/-/1056/3053596/-/qk83vtz/-/index.html. See also “Security cooperation,” the European Union site. http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/kenya/eu_kenya/security/index_en.htm (last accessed May 29, 2016); also was raised in the Human Rights Watch email communication with EU official, June 8, 2016. The official explained that the money is managed by an EU delegation in Ethiopia.

[289] See European Parliament resolution of 30 April 2015 on the persecution of Christians around the world, in relation to the killing of students in Kenya by terror group Al-Shabab. See also, Aggrey Mutambo, “EU parliament recommends antiterrorism mission in Kenya,” Daily Nation, April 29, 2015. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/European-Union-supports-anti-terrorism-miss... (last accessed May 29, 2016). “Kenya Attack: 147 killed in Garissa University assault,” BBC, April 3, 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-32169080 (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[290]“Fact Sheet: EU’s Work in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda,” https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/factsheet-eu-cooperatio... (last accessed July 5, 2016).

[291]EU email communication with Human Rights Watch on security sector support to Kenya, July 1, 2016.

[292]See EU press release, “The European Union announces more than 124 million pounds to increase security in Somalia,” September 9, 2013. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-816_en.htm (accessed May 29, 2016). See also Kevin Kelly, “AU tells security council of grave concern over pay cut for AMISOM soldiers,” The Daily Nation, January 29, 2016. http://www.nation.co.ke/news/-/1056/3053596/-/qk83vtz/-/index.html. See also “Security cooperation,” the European Union site. http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/kenya/eu_kenya/security/index_en.htm (last accessed May 29, 2016).

[293] Human Rights Watch email communication with EU official, June 8, 2016. The official explained that the money is managed by an EU delegation in Ethiopia.

[294]EU Response to Human Rights Watch on security sector support to Kenya, July 1, 2016.

[295]EU Response to Human Rights Watch on security sector support to Kenya, July 1, 2016.

[296]Human Rights Watch email communications with EU official in Brussels, June 8, 2016.

[297]Human Rights Watch email communication with an EU official, Nairobi, June 8, 2016.

Video: Kenyan Authorities Disappear People

$
0
0

Kenyan security forces have forcibly disappeared at least 34 people in the past two years during abusive counterterrorism operations in Nairobi and in northeastern Kenya. The military was actively involved in raiding homes and compounds to arrest people who were allegedly suspected of links with the armed Islamist group, Al-Shabab. But months, and in some cases over a year, later, suspects have not been charged with any crimes and families cannot locate them. In each case, although families reported the disappearance to the police and sought help from various authorities, the authorities failed to inform them of the detainees’ whereabouts or to properly investigate allegations of abuse.

Concern for the well-being of the 34 people is compounded by at least 11 cases in the past two years in which dead bodies of people previously arrested by state agents have been found, in some instances far from the location of their arrest. As far as Human Rights Watch is aware, police have not meaningfully investigated these deaths. In one instance, a body was exhumed in Mandera in response to public demands, but the government has not conducted an inquest or any meaningful investigations as required by Kenyan law. 

Government action to address abuses in counterterrorism operations is long overdue. The government should provide basic information regarding the identities, fate, and whereabouts of people arrested in these operations, and ensure basic due process rights for anyone who is arrested or in custody. The Kenyan police and military should urgently investigate allegations of disappearances, deaths and torture in the northeast, and bring those responsible to justice. The president should establish a special commission of inquiry to investigate and establish the extent of the abuses in Kenya’s counterterrorism operations.


US Dollars and Kenya’s ‘Disappeared’

$
0
0

Just over a year ago, in May, 2015, Kenyan Border Patrol police arrested Hussein Ali Abdullahi from his shop in Wajir, northeastern Kenya, and took him to Wajir military camp. His family hasn’t been able to trace him since that day. Omar Yusuf Mohamed’s family is looking for Omar too. Security officers arrested him in Mandera in April, 2015. Omar’s family and friends have gone to countless government offices, police stations, and military camps and to court in unsuccessful attempts to either trace him or compel police to produce him. There has been no response from any government office.

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the famil

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the family’s home in August 2015. 

Omar and Hussein are among 34 people a new Human Rights Watch report found to have been forcibly disappeared by Kenya’s security agencies in the last two years amidst the government’s response to undeniable and significant security challenges. Attacks by the armed Islamist group, Al-Shabaab, have killed hundreds of Kenyans in the northeastern region, along the coast, and the capital, Nairobi. Kenyan security forces have escalated operations to respond to attacks. Kenya’s donors – including the US – have been steady allies in the fight to combat Al-Shabaab, providing millions of dollars in assistance to Kenya’s security agencies. But those operations have been marked by serious abuses such as enforced disappearances and torture, particularly of ethnic Somali Kenyans, abuses that put the effectiveness of the US-backed counterterrorism efforts at risk.

The US maintains that Kenya is “a strategic partner” and an “anchor state in East Africa” in counterterrorism efforts, which has led to expanded American support to Kenya’s security sector, despite growing evidence of abusive behavior. The US provides Kenya with over $8 million in anti-terrorism law enforcement aid annually, among the largest such allocations to any sub-Saharan African country. While funding to the police has remained more or less steady over the last three years, funding to the Kenyan military, particularly for training and equipment, increased more than three-fold from 2015 to 2016 and will reach over $120 million this year.

In a speech in 2015, Secretary of State John Kerry noted that “human rights and the rule of law have to be respected in the counterterrorism efforts,” and that “security officials should partner with civil society organizations, especially with those with deep roots in the communities that are scarred by terrorism.” Yet consistent evidence shows that such an approach has yet to be embraced by the Kenyan government. US law and policymakers need to ensure US taxpayer dollars aren’t supporting abusive tactics, including enforced disappearances in Kenya.

Human Rights Watch just released a report based on interviews with over 117 people in the capital, Nairobi and in the northeastern counties of Garissa, Wajir, and Mandera and spoke to victims of arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions and mistreatment, witnesses to arrests and raids and security officials, including military and police officers. Meanwhile, the Kenyan government still fails to acknowledge these cases or to admit that some of those arrested have never been seen again – sometimes for over a year. The stories from people looking for their loved ones are tragic – many told us they went to their local police station, expecting to visit their family member who had been arrested, only to be told no one knew where the person was or which agency had them in custody.

That was the experience of the family of Farah Ibrahim Korio, an ethnic Somali Kenyan, teacher of Islamic education in Wajir, and father of five. He willingly reported to police when called there by a local chief in the end of June last year, never to be seen again. When family members came to look for him, police told them Farah had been taken for interrogations by military police, but now they have no trace of him.

The US needs to make good on the many rhetorical commitments to the importance of human rights protections in counterterrorism operations and encourage Kenya’s leadership to investigate and prosecute abusers in its ranks

Maria Burnett

Senior researcher, Africa Division

Communities in northeastern Kenya stand trapped by threats on both sides — Al-Shabaab’s violence and the government’s abusive and opaque law enforcement operations. As one man whose brother was arrested by police and hasn’t been seen since April 2015 told us: “My brother was picked up from his home town, where he was born, where he grew up, where he had children. Now no one knows whether he is alive or not….To see the dead body of your family member is painful, but you at least know he is dead. What is more painful is when you don’t know whether he is alive or dead.”

The White House has rightly argued that communities’ trust in law enforcement is critical to countering violent extremism. Kenyan efforts – supported by US money – to root out Al-Shabaab risk being undermined by communities who fear the very security agencies mandated to protect them. Most important, US money should not provide material support to Kenya’s security forces to units or commanders implicated in abuse.

The US needs to make good on the many rhetorical commitments to the importance of human rights protections in counterterrorism operations and encourage Kenya’s leadership to investigate and prosecute abusers in its ranks. Not only are the abuses unlawful, but “disappearing” suspects and instilling fear in communities may undermine US and Kenyan security objectives. Omar, Hussein and Farah – if they are still alive – should be charged with a crime or sent home to their awaiting families.

Letter to Secretary Kerry on Trip to Kenya, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia

$
0
0

The Honorable John F. Kerry
US Department of State
2201 C Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20520

August 19, 2016

Dear Secretary Kerry,

We write to you regarding your upcoming visit to Kenya, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia. We appreciate the administration’s consistent and engaged policies for both African countries and believe the trip also offers an important opportunity to address challenges in South Sudan and Somalia. In the case of Saudi Arabia, we continue to have concerns about violations of the laws of war in the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen and believe the upcoming trip presents an important opportunity for you to emphasize the potential consequences if Saudi Arabia fails to improve its conduct.  

Throughout your trip in all three countries, we urge you to be clear that the United States expects its partners to protect the equal rights of all, including marginalized communities; to ensure security forces protect instead of prey on civilians; and to commit to, as President Obama said on his 2015 trip to Kenya, “uphold the rule of law, and respect … human rights, and … treat everybody who’s peaceful and law-abiding fairly and equally.” We urge you to reemphasize these sentiments clearly, both in your private meetings and in public commentary.

Kenya

During your visit in May 2015, you called attention to the fact that “President Kenyatta reinforced his agreement with us that human rights and the rule of law have to be respected in the counterterrorism efforts.” While there have been some efforts to move in this direction, they have been mostly cosmetic.

We continue to document serious abuses in counterterrorism operations in Kenya, including enforced disappearances and torture. Over an eight-month period, we documented at least 34 cases of extrajudicial killings and another 11 deaths of people last seen in state custody over alleged links or knowledge of Al-Shabab in Nairobi and the northeastern part of the country.

Our research showed that multiple security agencies, including the Kenya Defence Forces (KDF), especially the Directorate of Military Intelligence, units of the Kenya Police, including the Anti-Terrorism Police Unit and the Administration Police, National Intelligence Service, and Kenya Wildlife Service rangers have played a significant role in these arrests and enforced disappearances. Currently civilian oversight mechanisms are either weak or lack the mandate to investigate abuse, particularly those carried out by the KDF. Thus far, senior Kenyan officials have not publicly acknowledged these abuses, not committed to any investigations, nor expressed concern for the whereabouts of those who are missing.

Given multiple units involved in the arrest and custody of people who have been forcibly disappeared, the numerous allegations of enforced disappearances and the government’s lack of commitment to investigate, we believe that the evidence indicates that these abuses are more than simply the work of rogue officers. Rather, we believe there is some level of coordination and control by government or security officials.

We hope you will raise these issues in your meetings with President Kenyatta and senior defense officials. Specifically, we hope you will urge President Kenyatta to publicly call for an end to extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and related abuses. In addition, he should urgently establish an independent and credible multiagency commission to investigate ongoing cases of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and torture in counterterrorism operations country-wide.

Last year, you called on Kenya to “not forcibly repatriate refugees.” However, the Kenyan government’s May 2016 termination of prima facie refugee recognition of Somalis, the dissolution of its Department of Refugee Affairs (DRA), and the announcement that it intends to close Dadaab refugee camp by November puts thousands of lives in jeopardy. Human Rights Watch has long documented Kenyan police abuse of Somali refugees, such as rape, beatings, arbitrary detention, and extortion of money and law enforcement operations marked by discrimination against Somalis. As a state party to the 1969 Africa Refugee Convention, Kenya has a legal obligation to ensure that anyone at risk of generalized violence, including Somali nationals, will not face unlawful forced return. In the specific case of Somali asylum seekers, we are deeply concerned that such returns will result in serious harm due to the ongoing conflict between Al-Shabab, government forces, and clan militia.

Given the government’s stated intention to close Dadaab, we also remain concerned that refugees and asylum seekers could face increased harassment and extortion if the returns process intensifies. Accordingly, we urge you to press the Kenyan government to rescind the decision to repatriate Somali refugees and close Dadaab. In addition, the Kenyan government should commit to uphold their obligations under international refugee law, and ensure that all asylum seekers have equal access to asylum processes. Given the dissolution of the DRA, the large number of unregistered Somali refugees, the high levels of generalized violence in Somalia, and the wider refugee definition in the Africa Refugee Convention, we recommend that you urge the Kenyan government to renew prima facie refugee recognition for Somali asylum seekers.

Finally, as we highlighted in our letter to you in April 2015, Kenyan civil society and the media operate in an increasingly difficult environment. We remain concerned that hostile official rhetoric, buttressed by efforts to enact restrictive new laws, could have a sharp impact on the availability of independent news and analysis and undermines freedom of expression and association, particularly in the run-up to the planned August 2017 elections. We believe you should continue to urge all members of the Kenyan government, both in public and in private, that the protection of civil society organizations – in line with the September 2014 Presidential Memorandum on Civil Society – is a top priority for the United States and that any new legislation should respect international standards on freedom of expression and association. 

Somalia

Given the cross border challenges, Kenya’s security will partly depend upon stability and increased security in Somalia. Your visit to Kenya and meetings with interlocutors of the African Union Forces in Somalia (AMISOM) offers the opportunity to make clear that the US is committed to supporting an international force in Somalia that is accountable for their conduct and that the presence of regional forces in Somalia does not contribute to further harm to civilians on the ground.

We continue to document abuses by AMISOM and associated troops, including sexual exploitation and abuse and unlawful attacks. Commitments to investigate abuses of civilians remain largely unfulfilled. For example, we are currently investigating an incident in which Ethiopian forces indiscriminately killed 14 civilians during an operation against Al-Shabab in Somalia’s Bay region in July. So far, despite public commitments by AMISOM’s leadership, there have been no investigations into the incident.

We hope you will raise this issue in all Somalia-related meetings and push for and support efforts to strengthen accountability mechanisms within AMISOM. Specifically, we encourage you to call on all troop-contributing countries operating in Somalia to deploy additional foreign military and civilian investigators, prosecutors and military courts inside the country, and greater information sharing within AMISOM forces and with the UN.

South Sudan

Your trip offers a timely opportunity to convene regional leaders on the crisis in South Sudan. Although sanctions action may be difficult to achieve multilaterally at the UN, we believe you should use this moment to push South Sudan’s neighbors to join coordinated bilateral sanctions against key human rights abusers. During a mission in July, our researchers documented how government and opposition forces soldiers used light and heavy weapons, used force indiscriminately in densely populated areas, and killed displaced people sheltering in UN camps, including two peacekeepers, and damaged a clinic.

We also found evidence that during and following the fighting in July, government soldiers deliberately killed, raped, and assaulted civilians, often along ethnic lines. Sexual violence was rampant, with the UN reporting more than 200 incidents during and after the fighting. In one brutal attack, soldiers executed a journalist and raped several foreign women working for international aid organizations. Soldiers also extensively looted humanitarian compounds, markets, and homes.

Commanders at the highest levels knew and should have known of these abuses and stopped them. Kenya, Ethiopia, and other regional partners host the assets of many of these individuals. We have urged the UN to impose targeted individual sanctions on those responsible, and hope you will also urge neighboring governments to consider bilateral sanctions.

The recent Juba violence and abuses underscore the need for accountability. We have urged South Sudan’s leaders to investigate and prosecute crimes, and have called on the African Union to proceed with preparations for the Hybrid Court envisioned in the 2015 peace agreement. That court would have jurisdiction over the most serious crimes committed since the beginning of the conflict, in December 2013, and over crimes committed in Juba in July. During your May 2015 visit, you pledged $5 million dollars. We urge you to make clear that some of those pledged funds will be used to assist the African Union Commission in its efforts to move forward with plans to take key steps towards setting the court up by October 2016.

The Juba violence is also a reminder that a comprehensive arms embargo is long overdue. An embargo would increase the cost of importing weapons, reduce civilian harm, immediately stop the maintenance of attack helicopters, and send a message that continued abuses against civilians and obstruction of the UN mission will not be tolerated. The United States has already said that it is prepared to support imposing an arms embargo on South Sudan if obstruction of the UN peacekeepers continues; while we believe that there is no need to wait any longer to move ahead with an arms embargo, it would help to get regional leaders to publicly back the prospect of an imminent arms embargo. Although both the African Union Peace and Security Council and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development have called for an arms embargo in the past, in recent days they have been silent on the issue. We hope that you can use this trip to ask regional leaders to express their public support for imposing a long overdue arms embargo on the country.

Nigeria

While there have been some notable efforts at reform by the Nigerian government in its fight to defeat the militant Islamic group Boko Haram, the group remains a serious threat to civilian security, and official reform has stalled. 

As you are aware, in responding to Boko Haram, government security forces have been implicated in grave violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, including incommunicado detention, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances. The Nigerian police have also been credibly implicated in extrajudicial killings of Boko Haram members or suspects. The Nigerian government is taking steps to address the heavy-handed and abusive response to the insurgency by security forces, but much more needs to be done, especially if the military is to genuinely protect civilians in the northeast while also addressing ongoing Boko Haram threats.

The humanitarian situation in the northeast remains dire. Recent reports suggest that at least 500,000 people in Borno state are displaced or cut off from humanitarian aid. Human Rights Watch has documented a campaign of attacks on schools, students, and teachers by Boko Haram in the northeast, and the inadequate government response has led to over one million children without access to education.

Abusive conduct by security and police forces also extends beyond the northeast. Of particular concern is the attack in Zaria in December 2015, when Nigerian soldiers killed hundreds of Shia Muslims in an attack that appears to have been wholly unjustified. A recent report of an official inquiry into the clashes concluded that the military was involved in unlawful killings and that its response was “disproportionate” and “excessive.”

The United States should ensure that any further support to the Nigerian military – including any impending sales, like the Super Tucano aircraft sale – is tied to clear progress on implementing meaningful reforms. In addition, we hope you will make clear during your trip that a critical part of reform includes meaningful progress on accountability for previous abuses by security and police forces.

Saudi Arabia

Your visit to Saudi Arabia offers an important opportunity to raise concerns about the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen. Over the last year and a half of the conflict, Human Rights Watch has documented numerous violations of the laws of war by the Saudi-led coalition, including indiscriminate and disproportionate airstrikes that have caused high civilian casualties. These include repeated strikes on residential homes, markets, medical facilities, schools, civilian factories, and structures that did not appear to be military objectives. In the renewed fighting since the breakdown of peace talks, coalition airstrikes have hit homes, another hospital, a school, and a civilian factory.

Under the laws of war, the United States, by directly assisting coalition military operations such as by providing targeting intelligence and in-air refueling, is a party to the conflict in Yemen. As such, the US has a legal obligation to investigate alleged violations of the laws of war in which US forces may have been responsible and appropriate prosecute war crimes that may have been committed. We are unaware of US participation in any investigations of alleged laws of war violations committed in Yemen.  

The United States has also for many years sold munitions, including cluster munitions, weapons, and weapons platforms to Saudi Arabia. Human Rights Watch has documented that US-supplied munitions have been used in apparently unlawful airstrikes in Yemen.  As you know, members of Congress have made several attempts this year to condition or restrict US military sales and assistance to Saudi Arabia. They are also likely to do so with respect to the $1.15 billion shipment of tanks, guns, and related equipment and services that the Pentagon revealed last week. Human Rights Watch supports a full arms embargo against Saudi Arabia until it adopts serious measures to abide by the laws of war, including impartially investigating alleged violations by its forces. Suspending weapons shipments would encourage Saudi Arabia to improve its compliance with international law.

Given growing congressional concern, we urge you to make clear to the Saudi government that airstrikes and other attacks that violate the laws of war need to end, and to credibly and impartially investigate alleged violations, which to date they have failed to do.

By participating in attacks that violate the laws of war and by providing weapons and munitions to a military force that can be expected to use them unlawfully, the US risks complicity in violations by coalition forces. This would be damaging both for US long-term interests in Yemen, including counterterrorism concerns, and its standing in the region.

We urge you to press the Saudi government to support the presence of independent international observers with access to assist in investigations of alleged laws of war violations by all parties to the conflict. We also ask that you call upon the Saudi government to meet with independent human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, to discuss issues of concern. (To date, our letters seeking information and requests for meetings have gone unanswered.)

We look forward to discussing these and other issues with you or your staff.

Sincerely,

Sarah Margon
Washington Director

Annex:

Kenya

Report: Deaths and Disappearances: Abuses in Counterterrorism Operations in Nairobi and in Northeastern Kenya July 19, 2016: Kenyan security forces have forcibly disappeared at least 34 people in the past two years during abusive counterterrorism operations in Nairobi and in northeastern Kenya. Kenyan authorities should end the abuses in counterterrorism operations and promptly investigate the enforced disappearances and deaths of detainees in the northeast. The 87-page report, “Deaths and Disappearances: Abuses in Counterterrorism Operations in Nairobi and in Northeastern Kenya,” documents 34 instances in multi-agency security operations in which the military was actively involved in raiding homes and compounds to arrest people who were allegedly suspected of links with the armed Islamist group, Al-Shabab. But months, and in some cases over a year, later, suspects have not been charged with any crimes and families cannot locate them. In each case, although families reported the disappearance to the police and sought help from various authorities, the authorities failed to inform them of the detainees’ whereabouts or to properly investigate allegations of abuse.

Investigate Killings of Lawyer, Two Men: Bodies Dumped in River after Enforced Disappearance July 3, 2016: Kenyan authorities must urgently investigate the killing last week of three men, including a human rights lawyer, and ensure that those found responsible are held to account in fair trials, 34 Kenyan and international human rights organizations said.

Police Killings During Protests: Investigate Use of Excessive Force in Western Region June 20, 2016: At least 5 people died and 60 were wounded by gunfire as police tried to obstruct two recent protests in Nyanza region. Kenyan authorities should promptly investigate police use of excessive force during the demonstrations, on May 23 and June 6, 2016, in the Nyanza region of Western Kenya, and bring anyone responsible to account.

Ending Refugee Hosting, Closing Camps: Ensure Required Protections for Refugees May 6, 2016: Kenya’s announcement on May 6, 2016 that it would no longer host refugees is contrary to principles it has pledged to respect.

Report: "You Are All Terrorists": Kenyan Police Abuse of Refugees in Nairobi May 29, 2013: Kenyan police in Nairobi tortured, raped, and otherwise abused and arbitrarily detained at least 1,000 refugees between mid-November 2012 and late January 2013, Human Rights Watch said in a report. The Kenyan authorities should immediately open an independent public investigation, and the United Nations refugee agency – which has not spoken publicly about the abuses – should document and publicly report on any future abuses against refugees, Human Rights Watch said. The 68-page report, “‘You are All Terrorists:’ Kenyan Police Abuse of Refugees in Nairobi,”is based on interviews with 101 refugees, asylum seekers, and Kenyans of Somali ethnicity. The report documents how police used grenade and other attacks by unknown people in Nairobi’s mainly Somali suburb of Eastleigh and a government order to relocate urban refugees to refugee camps as an excuse to rape, beat, extort money from, and arbitrarily detain, at least 1,000 people. The police described their victims as “terrorists,” and demanded payments to free them. Human Rights Watch also documented 50 cases in which the abuses would amount to torture.

Somalia

Report: 'Like Fish in Poisonous Waters’: Attacks on Media Freedom in Somalia May 3, 2016: Both the Somali government and the Islamist armed group Al-Shabab are using abusive tactics to sway media coverage, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today, on World Press Freedom Day. The government should act decisively to end intimidation and violence against journalists by state security forces and Al-Shabab militants. Somalis’ need for a free and vibrant media is especially important in light of the electoral process planned for 2016. The 74-page report, “‘Like Fish in Poisonous Waters’: Attacks on Media Freedom in Somalia,” documents killings, threats, and arbitrary detention of journalists since 2014. The Somali federal government and regional authorities have used various abusive tactics to affect media coverage, including arrests and forced closures of media outlets, threats, and occasionally, criminal charges. Al-Shabab has targeted journalists as part of its campaign against the Somali government and for reporting deemed unfavorable. Government authorities have failed to adequately investigate and prosecute those responsible for abuses, leaving journalists to live in fear.

Forced Evictions of Displaced People: Tens of Thousands at Risk in Capital April 20, 2015: Somali state security forces forcibly evicted about 21,000 displaced people in the capital, Mogadishu, in early March 2015. The authorities beat some of those evicted on March 4 and 5, destroyed their shelters, and left them without water, food, or other assistance. Many of those affected had fled their homes during the 2011 famine and fighting, and have been repeatedly displaced since then. Somali authorities should cease forcibly evicting displaced people in Mogadishu, and adequately protect and assist them, Human Rights Watch said.

Report of the Secretary-General on Somalia May 9, 2016

Report: Hostages of the Gatekeepers: Abuses against Internally Displaced in Mogadishu, Somalia March 28, 2013: Members of state security forces and armed groups have raped, beaten, and otherwise abused displaced Somalis who have arrived in Somalia’s capital fleeing famine and armed conflict since 2011, Human Rights Watch said in a report. The new Somali government should urgently improve the protection and security of Mogadishu’s internally displaced population. The 80-page report, “Hostages of the Gatekeepers: Abuses against Internally Displaced in Mogadishu, Somalia,” details serious violations, including physical attacks, restrictions on movement and access to food and shelter, and clan-based discrimination against the displaced in Mogadishu from the height of the famine in mid-2011 through 2012. Interviews with 70 displaced people documented the ways in which government forces, affiliated militia, and private parties, notably camp managers known as “gatekeepers,” prey upon the vulnerable community.

South Sudan

Killings, Rapes, Looting in Juba: Arms Embargo, Additional UN Sanctions Needed August 145, 2016: Soldiers killed and raped civilians and extensively looted civilian property, including humanitarian goods, during and after clashes between government and opposition forces in South Sudan’s capital, Juba, in July, 2016, Human Rights Watch said. In many cases, government forces appeared to target non-Dinka civilians. As a result of indiscriminate attacks, including shooting and shelling, shells landed in camps for displaced people inside United Nations bases, and in other densely populated areas in the city, killing and wounding civilians. Human Rights Watch researchers visiting Juba in July after the clashes documented multiple crimes, most committed by government soldiers from the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA).

Dispatches: Giving Justice the Slip in South Sudan June 8, 2016: Experience over the past two decades – including in Sierra Leone, the former Yugoslavia, and Chile – has shown that criminal trials for wartime atrocities have not undermined peace. On the contrary, the failure to pursue justice often fuels further crimes, such as in the Democratic Republic of Congo and, most recently, Syria. South Sudan is a prime example of how bad things can get. Despite years, even decades, of atrocities by commanders on all sides, peace deals – including from the North-South conflict – have repeatedly rewarded abusive leaders with plum positions and provided de facto blanket amnesties. Abuse of civilians has been a path to promotion and power.

Civilians Killed, Tortured in Western Region: Provide Justice for Army Abuses in Western Regions May 24, 2016: South Sudanese government soldiers have carried out a wide range of often-deadly attacks on civilians in and around the western town of Wau. Soldiers have killed, tortured, raped, and detained civilians and looted and burned down homes. The abuses in the Western Bahr el Ghazal region took place during government counterinsurgency operations that intensified after an August 2015 peace deal. The attacks underscore the need for the national unity government to take immediate steps toward accountability for crimes by all warring parties since the start of South Sudan’s conflict in December 2013.

Dispatches: Action, not Words, Needed to End Abuses in South Sudan April 27, 2016: South Sudan’s leaders may finally be ready to work toward peace, but they cannot gloss over the crimes with rhetorical niceties. They need to act. Both sides should investigate and prosecute human rights abuses and the government should order national security officials to charge or release the dozens of men arbitrarily detained in Juba. Finally, they need to show their commitment to justice and accountability by reaching out to the African Union Commission – tasked with setting up a hybrid court to try the most serious crimes – to establish the tribunal without delay. These steps, more powerfully than words, will signal their recognition that justice is necessary to redress “the situation we leaders have created.”

Dispatches: Missed Opportunity for an Arms Embargo on South Sudan April 8, 2016: The UN Security Council missed an opportunity this week to move forward with an embargo when the United States, which leads on the issue at the UN, chose to postpone the discussion until June.

Report: “We Can Die Too”: Recruitment and Use of Child Soldiers in South Sudan December 14, 2015: South Sudanese leaders should help end widespread use of child soldiers by suspending and investigating commanders who have recruited children, Human Rights Watch said in a report. Thousands of children have fought in the South Sudan conflict, including under commanders from both government and opposition forces. The 65-page report, “‘We Can Die Too’: Recruitment and Use of Child Soldiers in South Sudan,” names more than 15 commanders and officials from both the government Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and the rebel SPLA-in Opposition and their allies who have used child soldiers. The report is based on interviews with 101 child soldiers who were either forcibly recruited or joined forces to protect themselves and their communities. They said they lived for months without enough food, far away from family, and were thrown into terrifying gun battles in which they were injured and saw friends killed. Children also expressed deep regret that they had lost time they should have spent in school.

Nigeria

Dispatches: Nigerian Military Used Excessive Force Against Shia Group August 1, 2016: An official inquiry into clashes between members of a Shia minority group and the Nigerian military has stated the Nigerian Army’s response to altercations in Zaria, Kaduna State, between December 12 and 14, 2015 was “disproportionate”.

Report: “They Set the Classrooms on Fire”: Attacks on Education in Northeast Nigeria April 11, 2016: Boko Haram’s attacks on schools, students, and teachers in northeast Nigeria have had a devastating impact on education. The conflict has left nearly 1 million children with little or no access to school, and Nigeria’s security forces have contributed to the problem by using schools as military bases, putting children at further risk of attack from the Islamist armed group. The 86-page report, “‘They Set the Classrooms on Fire’: Attacks on Education in Northeast Nigeria,” documents Boko Haram’s increasingly brutal assaults on schools, students, and teachers since 2009 in Borno, Yobe, and Kano states. Between 2009 and 2015, Boko Haram’s attacks destroyed more than 910 schools and forced at least 1,500 more to close. At least 611 teachers have been deliberately killed and another 19,000 forced to flee. The group has abducted more than 2,000 civilians, many of them women and girls, including large groups of students.

A Year On, No Word on 300 Abducted Children: Government Response to Damasak Attacks Woefully Inadequate March 29, 2016: The Nigerian government should take urgent steps to secure the release of about 400 women and children, including at least 300 elementary school students, abducted by Boko Haram from the town of Damasak in Borno State a year ago. It is unclear whether the Nigerian government has made any serious effort to secure their release.

Dispatches: Protect Lives, Not Just Territory, Against Attacks February 4, 2016: Boko Haram may no longer ‘hold’ key towns, but it continues to commit crimes against civilians. The desire of the government to return the northeast to normalcy cannot be an excuse to press civilians to return to their home areas when they feel these are not safe. Greater efforts to prevent deadly crimes against civilians in the northeast should be the focus of the government, not just the recovery of territory.

Army Attack on Shia Unjustified: Independent, Impartial Probes Essential December 22, 2015: The killing of hundreds of Shia Muslim members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN), by Nigerian army soldiers from December 12 to 14, 2015, appears to have been wholly unjustified. The Judicial Commission of Inquiry set up by the government should be sufficiently independent and impartial to hold those responsible to account.

Saudi Arabia/Yemen

Report: Bombing Businesses: Saudi Coalition Airstrikes on Yemen's Civilian Economic Structures July 10, 2016: Saudi Arabia-led coalition airstrikes have unlawfully hit numerous factories, warehouses, and other civilian economic structures in Yemen, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. In the absence of credible and impartial investigations in Yemen, Saudi Arabia and other coalition members should agree to an independent international inquiry into these and other allegedly unlawful attacks. The 59-page report, “Bombing Businesses: Saudi Coalition Airstrikes on Yemen’s Civilian Economic Structures,” examines in detail 17 apparently unlawful airstrikes on 13 civilian economic sites, including factories, commercial warehouses, a farm, and two power facilities. These strikes killed 130 civilians and injured 171 more. Collectively, the facilities employed over 2,500 people; following the attacks, many of the factories ended their production and hundreds of workers lost their livelihoods. Further, with more than 20 million people in desperate need of humanitarian aid, the strikes on factories are contributing to the shortages of food, medicine, and other critical needs of Yemen’s civilians.

Suspend Saudi Arabia from UN Human Rights Council June 29, 2016: Saudi Arabia has committed gross and systematic violations of human rights during its time as a Council member, and it has used its position on the Council to shield itself from accountability for its violations in Yemen. Saudi Arabia leads the military coalition fighting in Yemen, with Riyadh hosting its command control structure. Since 26 March 2015, the coalition has carried out numerous attacks that have violated international humanitarian law, including indiscriminate and disproportionate airstrikes that have killed and injured many civilians. It has repeatedly used internationally banned cluster munitions, including in civilian populated areas.

US Bombs Used in Deadliest Market Strike: Coalition Allies Should Stop Selling Weapons to Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia-led coalition airstrikes using United States-supplied bombs killed at least 97 civilians, including 25 children, in northwestern Yemen on March 15, 2016, Human Rights Watch said today. The two strikes, on a crowded market in the village of Mastaba that may have also killed about 10 Houthi fighters, caused indiscriminate or foreseeably disproportionate loss of civilian life, in violation of the laws of war. Such unlawful attacks when carried out deliberately or recklessly are war crimes.

Embargo Arms to Saudi Arabia: US, UK, France Risk Complicity in Unlawful Airstrikes March 21, 2016: The United States, United Kingdom, France, and others should suspend all weapon sales to Saudi Arabia until it not only curtails its unlawful airstrikes in Yemen but also credibly investigates alleged violations.

US: Kerry’s Rights Priorities for Africa, Saudi Trip

$
0
0
US Secretary of State John Kerry gestures as he speaks at a news conference at the Nairobi Sankara Hotel on May 4, 2015, in Nairobi, Kenya.

US Secretary of State John Kerry gestures as he speaks at a news conference at the Nairobi Sankara Hotel on May 4, 2015, in Nairobi, Kenya. © 2015 Reuters

(Washington, DC) - United States Secretary of State John Kerry should underscore respect for human rights and civilian protection during his upcoming trip to Kenya, Nigeria, and Saudi Arabia, Human Rights Watch said in a letter to the secretary of state. Secretary Kerry will meet with senior government officials in Kenya on August 22, 2016, and in Nigeria on August 23-24. He will be in Saudi Arabia to discuss the armed conflict in Yemen on August 24-25.

“Secretary Kerry should press Kenya and Nigeria to ensure that security forces protect instead of prey on marginalized communities, including refugees,” said Sarah Margon, Washington director at Human Rights Watch. “Kerry needs to tell the Saudis that unless unlawful coalition airstrikes in Yemen stop, US weapons sales will.”

In Kenya, Kerry should urge investigations into security force abuses including enforced disappearances and torture. He should also urge Kenya not to close Dadaab, the world’s largest refugee camp, or forcibly repatriate Somali refugees to their embattled country. In Nigeria, Kerry should continue to press for meaningful reforms in the Nigerian military.

Kerry should also use his Africa visit to address widespread atrocities in South Sudan and urge leaders of countries in the region to impose targeted financial sanctions on individuals responsible for grave human rights abuses and to build international support for an arms embargo. Regarding Somalia, Kerry should push to strengthen accountability mechanisms within AMISOM, the international peacekeeping mission, with all troop-contributing countries.

In Saudi Arabia, Kerry should raise concerns about serious and repeated violations of the laws of war by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen that have killed many civilians. He should make clear that the Saudi government needs to end unlawful airstrikes or risk losing US sales of munitions and arms. He should also press the government to allow independent investigations into alleged war crimes by all parties to the conflict.

“The Obama administration will have few remaining opportunities to express its human rights concerns directly to leaders in the region,” Margon said. “It shouldn’t waste this one.”

Kenya’s 'Disappeared' Deserve Justice

$
0
0

A few months ago, I listened to a Kenyan man talk about his brother who has been missing since April 2015. “To see the dead body of your family member is painful, but you at least know he is dead,” he told me. As the world commemorates the International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances today, I think of him and many others I interviewed for Human Rights Watch’s report on people who “disappeared” after last being seen in the custody of Kenya’s security agents.

Others have reported similar findings. The official Kenya National Commission on Human Rights documented numerous similar cases, as have local rights groups and the Kenyan media.
 

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the famil

Zeinab Bulley Hussein holding the national identity card of her son, Abdi Bare Mohamed. Community members stumbled on Abdi Bare’s dead body 18 kilometers from Mandera, in northeastern Kenya, three weeks after police officers arrested him outside the family’s home in August 2015. 

Enforced disappearances are devastating. Family and friends of those disappeared suffer tremendously, often never learning whether their loved one is alive or dead. Under international human rights law, an enforced disappearance occurs when a person has been detained by government officials or their agents, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of the person’s liberty or to disclose the fate or whereabouts of the person.

In Kenya, Muslim communities are among those most affected by disappearances, caught between the threat of the armed Islamist group, Al-Shabab, and security forces that carry out abusive counterterrorism operations. While Kenyan government officials often condemn Al-Shabab’s horrific violence, they remain troublingly silent about security forces’ role in enforced disappearances.

Families who report their loved ones as missing to police, providing witness accounts of arrest, often receive no response or are told the police have no information. In some cases, government officials have suggested – without evidence – that Al-Shabab may have killed these people. When United States Secretary of State John Kerry recently visited Kenya, he said Kenyan authorities told him that people reported as disappeared may have crossed the Somali border to join Al-Shabab. This may be true in some cases, but without credible investigations into the disappearances – and considering Kenya’s counterterrorism response – these assertions should comfort no one.

Some diplomats suggested to me that perhaps the disappearances are conducted by “rogue” security officers. But the avalanche of evidence and the sophisticated inter-agency coordination of the operations make that unlikely. Even if true, without the government’s commitment to investigate the abuses and prosecute all those responsible, “rogue” officers will never face accountability.

Today, as the world stands in solidarity with victims of enforced disappearance, President Uhuru Kenyatta should commit to launching a commission of inquiry into these disappearances. Such an effort would be a first step toward justice.

Somali Refugees Left in Kenya's Dadaab Face Dangerous Choices

$
0
0

Hot, dusty wind has constantly passed through the thatch and thorn of Kenya’s Dadaab refugee camps since they opened in the early 1990s.

In May, however, a new wind created a chill among the estimated 340,000 mostly Somali refugees living here when President Uhuru Kenyatta declared that Dadaab would be closed by the end of 2016.

Somali refugees look through a barbed wire fence in Dadaab in 2013.

Somali refugees look through a barbed wire fence at a United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) distribution center during a food distribution exercise in Dagahale, a refugee settlement in Dadaab, northeastern Kenya, on October 8, 2013. 

After the announcement, Kenyan authorities, together with officials from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), stepped up a program to identify and process refugees willing to go back to Somalia.

Refugees opting for “voluntary repatriation” were promised a cash grant of $200 per person upon leaving and another $200 upon arrival, as well as utensils and other household items and a promise of six months of food assistance—though it is unclear that continuing support is really occurring. Those who refused were given no assurances that they would be allowed to stay.

A Human Rights Watch (HRW) team was in Dadaab from August 17-24 interviewing refugees about the nightmare they have endured for the past four months and the anxiety they are now experiencing about the four months to come. Some have agreed to return, others have said they want to stay, but all express the same fear: “What happens if we don’t accept the money and assistance to repatriate now? Will we be loaded onto trucks and forced back with nothing later in the year?”

No official has assured any of the people we interviewed that they will not be forced back if they do not agree to go now.

Conditions in Somalia do not appear conducive to refugees returning. The U.S. Agency for International Development’s July 2016 assessment of conditions in Somalia said that malnutrition rates in the Horn of Africa country remain among the highest in the world and recorded 10,000 cholera cases in the first six months of 2016. UNHCR’s latest assessment of conditions in southern/central Somalia in May found: “Civilians continue to be severely affected by the conflict, with reports of civilians being killed and injured in conflict-related violence, widespread sexual and gender-based violence against women and children, forced recruitment of children, and large-scale displacement.”

At the moment, it is not even clear whether local Somali factions will allow returns to and through their areas of control.

In 2013, Kenya, Somalia, and UNHCR signed a Tripartite Agreement—set to expire in November—that outlined the standards for voluntary repatriation of Somali refugees. In June, they reiterated their commitment to work within the framework of that agreement, yet also noted the “prospect” of reducing the Dadaab refugee population by 150,000 by the end of 2016.

The communique of the June meeting said nothing about the fate of the other estimated 190,000 refugees in the camps. UNHCR’s silence, combined with Kenyan government statements that Dadaab will be closed by the end of November—repeated daily in radio broadcasts here—is why so many of the Somali refugees we have talked to feel that they have no choice but to leave.

The refugees’ fears are reinforced by their memories of the Kenyan government’s previous heavy-handed efforts to coerce Somalis to go home, including Operation Usalama Watch in 2014, which featured harassment, arbitrary detention, forced relocation to refugee camps and summary deportations.

How many of the more than 20,000 Somali refugees who have “voluntarily” returned are now displaced internally in unsustainable and unsafe areas of Somalia because they thought if they didn’t “choose” to go with money and assistance, they would be dumped there with nothing in the next few months? How many of the 1,000 people per day the Kenyan government is now sending back will be heading into danger?

If they truly care about being respectful of refugee wishes, UNHCR, the U.N. agency mandated to protect the world’s refugees, and the Kenyan government need to acknowledge that refugee repatriation cannot be considered remotely voluntary unless refugees are assured that an option to stay in dignity actually exists.

Kenya: Involuntary Refugee Returns to Somalia

$
0
0

(Nairobi) – Kenya’s repatriation program for Somali refugees, fueled by fear and misinformation, does not meet international standards for voluntary refugee return. Many refugees living in Kenya’s sprawling Dadaab camp, home to at least 263,000 Somalis, say they have agreed to return home because they fear Kenya will force them out if they stay.

In May 2016, the Kenyan government announced plans to speed up the repatriation of Somali refugees and close the Dadaab camp in northeastern Kenya by November. Kenyan authorities, with officials from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), then stepped up a 2013 “voluntary” repatriation program

Kenya’s repatriation program for Somali refugees, fueled by fear and misinformation, does not meet international standards for voluntary refugee return.

During an August 2016 visit to Dadaab by Human Rights Watch, refugees described intimidation by the Kenyan government, silence over alternative options that would allow them to remain in Kenya, inadequate information on conditions in Somalia, and a US$400 UN cash grant they would forfeit if they were deported later this year. The refugees said that these factors were prompting many camp residents to return now to Somalia, where they face danger, persecution, and hunger.

“The Kenyan authorities are not giving Somali refugees a real choice between staying and leaving, and the UN refugee agency isn’t giving people accurate information about security conditions in Somalia,” said Bill Frelick, refugee rights director at Human Rights Watch. “There is no way these returns can be considered voluntary.”

The 1951 Refugee Convention prohibits refoulement, the return of a refugee “in any manner whatsoever” to a place where their life or freedom would be threatened. Refoulement occurs not only when a refugee is directly rejected or expelled, but also where indirect pressure on individuals is so intense that it leads them to believe that they have no practical option but to return to a country where they face serious risk of persecution or threats to their lives and safety.

Under international refugee practice, repatriation is only considered voluntary if refugees have a genuinely free choice about whether to return and are fully informed about conditions in their home country. Human Rights Watch interviewed about 100 refugees and asylum seekers at the Dadaab camp and found that neither condition is being met under the current voluntary repatriation program.

Until the Kenyan government publicly declares that Somali refugees fearing return will be allowed to remain, and UNHCR and its partners fully and accurately inform refugees about security conditions in Somalia, returns under the ongoing program amount to refoulement, Human Rights Watch said.

Refugees said the government’s decision to close the Dadaab camp had left them feeling trapped. They are afraid to return to Somalia, but also afraid of being arrested and deported if they stay in Dadaab until the November deadline. Many have therefore chosen to take US$400 in cash as part of a UNHCR-returns assistance package because they believe that if they don’t, they will be summarily deported later this year with nothing.

“We fled Somalia because of specific problems and those problems are still there,” said “Sahra,” a 42-year-old woman from Hiraan region who has signed up to return to Somalia. “It’s not the right time for us to go back. But every day the Kenyan government is telling us that we have to go, and UNHCR is not giving us any different information… I said I will go back as we have no other option.”

Human Rights Watch repeatedly asked a Kenyan government official in Dadaab, the deputy county commissioner, what would happen to refugees who don’t leave after Dadaab closes and whether they will be able to stay in Kenya. He answered: “The choice is theirs to go home.”

Some Somalis who agreed to return to Somalia after spending years as refugees in Dadaab have fled back to Kenya a second time because of ongoing violence and lack of basic services in Somalia. Human Rights Watch found that newly arrived Somali asylum seekers and refugees who were not able to re-establish themselves in Somalia are being denied access to refugee registration or asylum procedures in Dadaab. This leaves them without legal status and food rations.

Many of the estimated 335,000 Somali refugees in Kenya’s camps and cities fled the conflict in their home country in the 1990s, or are their children or grandchildren. Over the past decade, a new wave of refugees fled a combination of drought, ongoing violence, and abuse including by the armed Islamist group Al-Shabab, which is at war with the Somali government.

Hostility and abuse of Kenya’s Somali refugee population has increased significantly since Kenyan troops entered Somalia in 2011, and after a series of deadly Al-Shabab attacks on Kenyan territory between 2011 and 2015. The government’s formal announcement on May 6, 2016, that Dadaab would close said that because of its “national security interests, [the government] has decided that hosting of refugees has to come to an end” and called for closure “within the shortest time possible.”

In November 2013, Kenya, Somalia, and UNHCR signed an agreement for the “voluntary” repatriation of Somali refugees that says both countries and UNHCR will make sure Somalis return voluntarily in safety and dignity. The current experiences of many Somali refugees in Dadaab stands in sharp contrast to those commitments, Human Rights Watch said.

UNHCR-Somalia officials acknowledged to Human Rights Watch that their assessments indicate that conditions in south-central Somalia are not conducive to mass refugee returns in safety and dignity. UNHCR’s latest assessment in May found: “Civilians continue to be severely affected by the conflict, with reports of civilians being killed and injured in conflict-related violence, widespread sexual and gender-based violence against women and children, forced recruitment of children, and large-scale displacement.”

The information that UNHCR provides to refugees in Dadaab seeking to make an informed choice about returning, however, is mostly superficial and out of date, and sometimes misleading, Human Rights Watch said.

As a party to the 2013 “voluntary” repatriation agreement, UNHCR has been actively engaged in facilitating the repatriations of thousands from Dadaab to Somalia. UNHCR says it is not promoting repatriation, but that it will facilitate repatriation for Somalis who freely choose to return home, a distinction it makes for assisted returns to places it does not consider to be safe for most refugees to return.

The Kenyan government and UNHCR are conducting a verification exercise to reduce the number of refugees counted as living in Dadaab by determining whether people living in the camp are entitled to be there. It excludes formerly registered camp residents with inactive ration cards and asylum seekers who have not been allowed to register as refugees, as well as residents found to be Kenyan citizens. During the exercise, all verified Somali refugees are asked whether they want to return to Somalia and whether they are willing to do so this year. As of August, according to UNHCR, there were 263,000 Somali refugees in Dadaab, a 75,000 reduction from the 338,000 count at the end of July.

Photo of Somali refugees getting on buses to leave Dadaab refugee camp.

Somali refugees waiting to board buses that will take them back to Somalia after the Kenya government annouced the closure of the Dadaab refugee camps. 

As of mid-August, more than 24,000 Somalia refugees had returned to Somalia from Dadaab since the start of the repatriation process in December 2014. Of that total, 18,110 returned in 2016, 10,000 after the camp closure announcement in May. Kenyan authorities told Human Rights Watch in mid-August that they were assisting about 1,000 refugees a day to return. On August 29, returns were suspended because local authorities in Jubaland, an interim regional administration in Somalia bordering Kenya to which many of the refugees are returning, said they could not sufficiently assist returning refugees. Negotiations to resume the repatriations are ongoing.

“UNHCR is aware that south-central Somalia is in no way conducive to large-scale refugee returns,” Frelick said. “UNHCR should not facilitate any returns until Kenya says those afraid to go home can stay in Kenya and UNHCR provides refugees with accurate information about what they will face when they go home.”

Methodology

Human Rights Watch researchers visited Dadaab, Kenya, between August 17 and 24 and conducted private interviews with 69 individual refugees and unregistered asylum seekers. Human Rights Watch also interviewed 31 refugees and unregistered asylum seekers in Dadaab in April, shortly before the camp closure announcement. All interviewees were advised of the purpose of the research and how the information would be used. Human Rights Watch explained the voluntary nature of the interview and that the person could refuse to be interviewed, refuse to answer any question, and terminate the interview at any point. Interviewees did not receive any compensation. The team also visited one “help desk” center in the Hagadera settlement in the Dadaab camp on August 23. The names of those quoted in this report have been changed for their protection.

Human Rights Watch also met with Kenyan government officials, including the deputy county commissioner and the leaders of the new Operation Refugees Repatriation Team in Dadaab, UNHCR staff in Dadaab and Nairobi, and a dozen staff of international and Kenyan non-governmental organizations involved in refugee protection and assistance in Kenya.

Kenya’s and UNHCR’s Failure to Meet Conditions for Voluntary Return

The principle that refugee repatriation must be voluntary is explicit in both the 2013 Tripartite Agreement Governing the Voluntary Repatriation of Somali Refugees Living in Kenya and the 1969 African Refugee Convention, to which Kenya is a state party.

Ensuring that refugee repatriation is voluntary involves more than ticking off a box on a form. UNHCR’s Handbook on Voluntary Repatriation sets out two clear conditions for repatriation to be considered voluntary. First, whether a return is voluntary “must be viewed in relation to … condition in the country of origin (calling for an informed decision).” An informed decision on return conditions must be based on information that is “objective, accurate, and neutral,” must “not [be] propaganda” and “care must be taken not to paint an overly rosy picture of the return.” Refugees should also be fully informed of the limits of UNHCR’s protection and assistance following return.

Second, whether a return is voluntary “must be viewed in relation to … the situation in the country of asylum (permitting a free choice).” Refugees “need to know about what will happen in the event they decide not to volunteer for repatriation” and that “repatriation is not voluntary when host country authorities deprive refugees of any real freedom of choice.”

Neither of these two conditions are being met in Dadaab, Human Rights Watch found.

Fear of Deportation After Threatened Camp Closure
The Kenyan government is not offering refugees a real choice between staying in Kenya or returning safely to Somalia. Anxious refugees interviewed by Human Rights Watch who are opting to return referred time and again to the government announcement of the camp closure and radio broadcasts telling them to go home as the main factors influencing their decision.

Photo: Refugees stand outside their tent at the Ifo Extension refugee camp in Dadaab, near the Kenya-Somalia border in Garissa County, Kenya, October 19, 2011.

Refugees stand outside their tent at the Ifo Extension refugee camp in Dadaab, near the Kenya-Somalia border in Garissa County, Kenya, October 19, 2011. 

Others said they were worried about losing out on help to go home if they refused now, only to be forced out in a few months. UNHCR and its partners have been providing Somali refugees who opt to return with an assistance package, which was increased in July 2016 to include an average cash grant of US$200 in Kenya per person and then again another US$200 upon arrival, as well as non-food items and vouchers for limited food assistance. However, it is unclear whether the food assistance in particular is systematically available in any of the return areas other than Mogadishu.

“We have no clarity on what the future holds,” said a 70-year-old grandfather living in the Ifo 2 settlement in Dadaab. “What will happen if we don’t voluntarily return? Will we be forced back in a few months? We are feeling a lot of pressure. If we will be forced back anyway, it would be better to take the benefits now rather than just get kicked back later.”

A 69-year-old man originally from Qansahdheere, Somalia said:

Nobody said that food and security will be guaranteed, but they just asked if I would be willing to go back and of course, what can I say but yes. My children want to stay, but I worry they will suffer if they stay.

Nuur, a 33-year-old teacher and father-of-three, from Kismayo, Somalia said:

The government has said that the camp will close, I am not waiting around to see what happens. I have heard this several times on the radio. During the refugee verification exercise, [in which officials count refugees and verify their identifications] they asked me if I was willing to go back, I said yes, if there is peace in Somalia. But the main reason I am going back is because of what the government has said. We haven’t seen force yet, but if force will begin to be used, I would worry for my children.

Nasra, who recently fled from the Al-Shabab-controlled town of Sakoow in Somalia said:

Everyone is rushing as we heard that the camp would be closed by November, I haven’t heard anyone saying that we can stay, just that we have to go.

A mother-of-five from a village near the Al-Shabab controlled town of Buale in Somalia said:

Since our future is unclear, I do not want to be put on a lorry and sent back, so I will take the money.

A number of aid workers in Dadaab also raised concerns. A senior representative of an international aid group said:

I think the options are very clear: there are no real options right now. If it was not the government position, the refugees would have stayed, but they are tired of being told to leave. Refugees are in a dilemma as their only option right now is insecure returns.

None of the refugees interviewed said that any officials had given them assurances that they would be allowed to stay if they refused to go now.

UNHCR has been silent on what will happen to refugees still in the camp come November, including regarding service provision. An outreach worker for an international aid group said:

UNHCR is treading very carefully with giving information. As UNHCR is not communicating, refugees are not receiving information on what happens after November. The attitude seems to be we will cross that bridge when we reach it. If that many people have left by then, they might not need to close the camp. Most of the refugees I speak to say that they are “willing” because they fear. But people are also worried whether they will still get camp services after November. UNHCR has not been communicating on this either.

Intimidation by Kenyan Government Officials
Refugees and asylum seekers consistently told Human Rights Watch that the Kenyan government officials are putting direct and indirect pressure on them to return to Somalia.

Photo: An aerial picture shows a section of the Hagadera camp in Dadaab near the Kenya-Somalia border, May 8, 2015.

An aerial picture shows a section of the Hagadera camp in Dadaab near the Kenya-Somalia border, May 8, 2015.

“We hear rumors of forced returns on the radio,” said Nuh, a 53-year-old man disabled by multiple gunshot wounds who has been living in Dadaab’s Hagadera settlement since 1998. He said he heard the regional coordinator for northeastern Kenya, Mohamud Ali Saleh, say on the radio that Kenya is not our country and that we will have to go back.

Print media quoted Mohamud Ali Saleh saying, “Somalia is safe and the refugees should join their brothers and sisters,” and telling local residents that the government would take “stern action” against any who would harbor refugees escaping the camps. A video shows him saying, “Refugees stayed here in Kenya for 25 years and that is enough…. It is time for them to go back home and build their country.”

Overt pressure by Kenyan officials in the camps has been directed to the camps’ refugee community leaders. Six leaders told Human Rights Watch that, in late July, they attended a meeting at which the deputy county commissioner (DCC), Harun Kamau, intimidated them to get them to agree to return before November.

One elder said:

When I tried to tell the DCC that people can’t go back, that it is not as safe as he suggests, he pointed his finger at me and told me to sit down. He told me to pick up a gun and defend my country. We were never told directly this would happen but after that meeting, people began to really worry that we would be put into lorries come November.

A community leader from Dabaab’s Kambios settlement described a meeting of Interior Ministry officials and community leaders:

They say, ‘Why are your people not going back to Somalia?’ I am an experienced man. I know institutions. I understand what they mean when they ask that question. The message to us is: you must go back. There is more and more pressure on the few who remain. We fear we will be harmed. The message we hear is that the government will send some military to harm those who remain. I can’t say that people will be harmed, but that is the fear.

The lack of clear information about the situation after the November deadline has prompted confusion. A 42-year-old woman in the Hagadera settlement said:

I have not heard it myself, but the block leaders met with government officials who gave them the message that in November the government will close the camp. There will be no food or benefits after November. That is why people are going back now.

Human Rights Watch did not document recent incidents of police violence but refugees said they were aware of past abusive operations. During Kenya’s Operation Usalama Watch in 2014, authorities engaged in heavy-handed efforts to coerce Somalis to go home, including police harassment, arbitrary detention, forced relocation to refugee camps, and summary deportations.

Limited information on country of origin
Informed consent – fully understanding the conditions in the country to which one agrees to return – is key to a voluntary decision to repatriate. Through partners from nongovernmental agencies, UNHCR is tasked with providing each returnee with information about nine areas of possible return in Somalia at “help desks” in Dadaab’s five settlements. While UNHCR is not promoting repatriation, under the terms of the November 2013 tripartite agreement it has undertaken responsibility to ensure that refugees have access to accurate and objective information on the situation in Somalia. However, Human Rights Watch found that information provided to refugees in Dadaab is mostly superficial and out of date, and sometimes misleading.

Photo: Somali refugees queuing inside the UNHCR Hagadera center waiting to access the helpdesk room to be registered to return to Somalia.

Somali refugees queuing inside the UNHCR Hagadera center waiting to access the helpdesk room to be registered to return to Somalia. 

During an August 23 visit to a help desk, where refugees go to register with UNHCR for repatriation, the situation was chaotic and information was severely limited. Outside the disorganized, crowded, and overwhelmed office, hundreds of refugees were pushing and shoving to get near the doorway. Human Rights Watch witnessed a number of private security guards, and at least one police officer, hitting refugees with wooden sticks to control the crowd.

“The registration process is a mess,” said Nuur, the 33-year-old teacher. “There are many people in the office, people have to stand outside in the scorching sun, there are soldiers with guns, sometimes they beat people in the queues.”

Inside the help desk office, the officer in charge of providing information said that the maximum time spent with each refugee family both for registration and information sharing was five minutes. At most, the official has enough time to present them with a pamphlet describing conditions in their place of return. But many refugees don’t even receive the pamphlet. Only one of the 32 refugees Human Rights Watch interviewed who had signed up to return had received a pamphlet.

Information presented in the pamphlets, particularly on security conditions, is inadequate, Human Rights Watch found. The pamphlets had not been updated since December 2015, despite Somalia’s volatile and changing security and political landscape. The sparse information on the security situation inaccurately describes what returnees will face.

For example, the pamphlet on Mogadishu, Afgooye, and Jowhar, repeats the same one-sentence boilerplate description of security conditions in all three locations: “The town is secured with established administration and with uniformed police conducting regular patrols.” The entry on security conditions in Mogadishu adds only one more sentence, stating there are “neighborhood watches” in eight districts. The entry on Jowhar adds, “The police have a police station and conduct patrols.” One has to look carefully to notice that the word “regular” does not appear before “patrols,” as it does for the other entries.

In contrast to the perfunctory two sentences about security conditions in Mogadishu, UNHCR’s May 2016 assessment of conditions in Somalia available on its web page says this about the effectiveness of those same police patrols in Mogadishu:

In and around Mogadishu, members of government forces, allied militias, AMISOM [peace support] troops, and persons referred to as “men wearing uniforms” have been reported to subject civilians to sexual violence, including rape. The police and security forces are reportedly able to commit abuses in a climate of impunity. Law enforcement agencies are also reported to fail to prevent, or to respond to or investigate incidents of violence. The civilian judicial system is reported to be largely non-functional across the country. General crime rates have reportedly increased significantly in 2015.

Limitations on information, monitoring capacity
The 2013 tripartite agreement includes extensive language outlining the responsibilities of UNHCR to monitor returns and reintegration. For UNHCR to monitor the situation for returning refugees and to feedback its conclusions to refugees in Kenya considering repatriation, UNHCR needs to have a significant presence in Somalia.

Yet, UNHCR and its international implementing partners have limited access in Somalia. On August 25, UNHCR-Somalia told Human Rights Watch that it faces restrictions in its capacity to gather information, particularly in areas of military offensives and border areas. In April, a UNHCR spokesperson told the media: “It has proven difficult to establish a picture of how returnees are faring for a number of reasons. Often, returnees move on from areas where we have access, to areas where we are unable or have difficulty in accessing due to UN and other security constraints. However, we do endeavor to monitor through partners and our monitoring networks.”

The UN protection cluster, the body that coordinates protection activities in Somalia, produced its first analytical report in June 2016, but that information has yet to be transmitted to refugees in Dadaab.

Other factors undermining voluntary return
Several people, most of them women, said that they felt increasingly unsafe as their fellow community members left Dadaab. Deka, a 45-year-old woman from Mogadishu, said this made her decide to sign-up to return:

We used to have a normal life in Kenya, but then the radio started saying, ‘Refugees go back to your country,’ and I started seeing my neighbors leave. I got very scared, I felt lonely. I was worried about my security.

Sahra, a 35-year-old woman from Beletweyn, said:

I am worried because my neighbors are going back and I am under pressure to return, but I know it’s not the right time to return for me.

Increasingly harsh living conditions in Dadaab have also influenced people’s decisions. The World Food Program, which provides food rations to Dadaab’s population, has repeatedly cut rations, due to funding shortfalls. The most recent cut was in June 2015, when the program cut rations by 30 percent. Refugees Human Rights Watch interviewed in April 2016 who had signed up to return to Somalia all cited the ration cuts as the main factor influencing their decision. The June 2015 cut has been compensated somewhat since January 2016 by cash distribution.

“The food situation has been bad for two years now,” said a community leader in the Kambios settlement. “But it’s worse since the repatriations started as now we can’t buy on credit as a lot of shops are closing up. If all the refugees leave, I will have to. I will have to go back to my village where I am not sure I can be safe.”

In addition, unregistered refugees and asylum seekers who do not have ration cards said they are finding it more difficult to survive and share rations with relatives or neighbors because many of those with ration cards have left.

Ruun is a 36-year-old mother-of-nine children whose ration card was deactivated after she returned to Kismayo, Somalia in August 2014 to care for her sick mother. She returned to Dadaab because she was worried her 14-year-old son would be recruited as a fighter if she remained, and she couldn’t afford to take her children to school. “I came back here to be safe and secure and for my children to go to school,” she said. Despite her fears, she was turned away during the joint government-UNHCR verification exercise, and does not have food rations to feed her children:

Neighbors share their rations with me and I wash clothes and clean people’s houses. It is difficult to live in Dadaab without a ration card. If I would get back my refugee status, I would stay here. But I can’t live without rations, so I may have to go back.

Access to Asylum for Somali Refugees

In May, the Kenyan government also closed its Department of Refugee Affairs, which was in charge of registering refugees, and announced that Somali asylum seekers would no longer automatically receive refugee status. Asylum seeker registration in Dadaab has been sporadic since 2011. UNHCR said that the last registration took place in the summer of 2015.

Government officials in Dadaab made clear to Human Rights Watch that new arrivals are not being registered. The deputy county commissioner said: “If we repatriate 1,000 but then 1,000 new arrivals come, we would not be getting the job done.” The same official said: “We have instructed UNHCR not to register new arrivals.” The new government refugee entity, Refugee Affairs Secretariat, is not authorized to register people in Dadaab. UNHCR officials told Human Rights Watch that they know of 4,000 unregistered asylum seekers in the camp, though this number is unlikely to include new arrivals since the Department of Refugee Affairs was disbanded.

Human Rights Watch spoke to 23 unregistered new arrivals, including people who are registered refugees with inactivated ration cards and thus are not able to take part in the verification exercise, people who had returned under the repatriation program but have fled back to Dadaab, and new asylum seekers. None had been able to take part in the verification exercise and are therefore unlikely to be included in the final camp census.

Unregistered people said they feel particularly vulnerable both because of their lack of access to food aid and due to their lack of legal status. Farhan, a 23-year-old from Mogadishu, who arrived in Dadaab nine months ago, said: “Unless the government announces that that they will register unregistered people I will not step forward. I am afraid they would arrest me.”

Bare, a refugee whose ration card is inactivate, said:

I feel very much pressure. I am unregistered and living in the camp. I face a lot of problems. They have not arrested me yet, but it could happen any time. The police sometimes stop people. If you show your refugee card, they let you go, but if not, they arrest you. I am feeling they will ultimately force me back to Somalia against my will. I should have the rights of a refugee, but I can’t get documents from UNHCR. For the past four months, I go to UNHCR every day, but every day they tell me they can’t help me.

Conditions in Somalia 

The success or failure of repatriation hinges on what happens to refugees once they have returned home. In May, UNHCR released an updated position on returns to south-central Somalia, which said, “Civilians continue to be severely affected by the conflict, with reports of civilians being killed and injured in conflict-related violence, widespread sexual and gender-based violence against women and children, forced recruitment of children, and large-scale displacement.”

Human Rights Watch spoke to refugees caught up in fighting and insecurity in many of the current or planned areas of return. A number of refugees from Belet Hawa have recently arrived in Dadaab. A 42-year-old woman who returned to Belet Hawa in January said:

I had received information that Belet Hawa was safe, but when I returned, I saw that nothing had changed. There the young and the old carry guns, there is no peace… There were three bouts of fighting between two sub-clans of the Marehan…My husband who has a mental health condition was very affected by the fighting. It’s hard to know how to protect yourself.

According to the UNHCR, 68 percent of returnees to Somalia in 2016 as of August were children. According to the UN, recruitment of children, primarily by Al-Shabab but also by the Somalia National Army and clan militia, had increased significantly in 2015. Human Rights Watch spoke to several young men and boys who had returned with their families to Al-Shabab-controlled areas, including Buale and Sakoow, and who were approached by Al-Shabab. Human Rights Watch also spoke to parents who said they came back to Kenya out of fear that their children would be recruited if they remained in Somalia.

Refugees who had returned to Al-Shabab-controlled or government-controlled areas said that lack of food, as well as lack of basic services, primarily education, made it impossible for them to survive or to re-establish themselves. Moulid had returned without assistance to a village in Qansahdheere district in 2015, but Al-Shabab restrictions on movement severely affected his survival:

There was no way we could travel to the market in Dinsoor. I was not able to get food for my children. When I returned to Dadaab, my children were admitted to a hospital because of malnutrition.

Access to services, land, and protection from abuse often go hand in hand. An elderly man from Luuq returned to Somalia in September 2015 with his 10 children because the ration cuts in Dadaab were making it impossible for him to survive:

When I arrived in Luuq I found that people had built on my property. We spent three months living under a tree. I complained to the authorities, but I knew it would take time. But we didn’t have time, my children were without shelter and hungry.

He walked back to Dadaab with his children.

UNHCR has steadily increased the number of areas designated as areas of return, and will shortly be expanding them to 12. UNHCR told Human Rights Watch that the expansion was based on the access aid agencies have to the designated areas and, for the more recent expansion, on an assessment that significant numbers of refugees were returning to specific areas. Although UNHCR is careful not to refer to the areas of return as “safe,” Kenyan authorities have no such reticence. The deputy county commissioner told Human Rights Watch, “UNHCR is not taking people to unsafe areas. They are only being taken back to safe areas. They can continue to enjoy education and health care in their home country.”

Ongoing abuses against displaced people in Somalia
It is of particular concern that returning refugees, especially those unable to return to their areas of origin or those who have been gone for many years, will end up among the 1.1 million people already internally displaced in Somalia and living in dangerous internal displacement camps. The exact number who have faced new displacement within Somalia after returning is unknown.

In an August 25 meeting, UNHCR told Human Rights Watch that at least 10 percent of people who returned in June and July are believed to have ended up internally displaced.

Some people who had been unable to return to their areas of origin told Human Rights Watch that they ended up in unsafe displacement camps. Amina, a 38-year-old single mother returned to her village, Bula Gudud, as part of the assisted returns in January 2015 with her five children. When fighting erupted in this town she fled to Kismayo and ended up in an informal displacement camp. She barely survived there, for nine months carrying water to sell in the market. After a man in a government uniform raped her, a common occurrence in the unprotected and poverty stricken camps across the country, Amina gave up and 10 months ago begged her way back to Dadaab, where she is no longer a registered refugee.

Others who have signed up to return are aware they are likely to wind up as internally displaced people. The 69-year-old man with a disability from an Al-Shabab-controlled village near Qansahdheere said: “I know neighbors from Dadaab who have returned to Baidoa. They told me they haven’t found any housing. I heard we won’t get any shelter on the local radio. We will join them and other IDPs.”

Recommendations

The Kenyan authorities should:

  • Publicly assure all Somali refugees and asylum seekers still fearing return that they will be allowed to stay in dignity in Kenya;
  • Reinstate procedures recognizing Somali refugees on a prima facie basis or establish fair, transparent, and effective asylum procedures across the country; and
  • Continue to recognize as refugees those who were unable to reestablish themselves in Somalia after repatriating and coming back to Kenya.

UNHCR should:

  • Not facilitate any refugee returns to Somalia until Kenya confirms that all refugees have a genuinely free choice to stay in Kenya or return to Somalia;
  • Ensure that refugees are provided with accurate and up-to-date information about conditions in Somalia, including security conditions, consistent with UNHCR’s most current Position on Returns to Southern and Central Somalia;
  • Ensure that this information is made readily available to Somali refugees, including through meaningful counseling and the radio; and
  • Resume “go-and-see” visits by camp leaders to enable them to assess conditions in return areas and report back to camp residents.

Donors, notably the US, EU and UK, the three leading donors for Dadaab, should:

  • Ensure that refugees remaining in Dadaab receive adequate aid and opportunities for other durable solutions, including greater use of resettlement to countries outside the region, for as long as they have well-founded fears of return to persecution or other serious abuses in Somalia; and
  • Insist that any organized returns of refugees from Dadaab fully comply with standards for voluntary repatriation and refuse to fund or otherwise support involuntary refugee returns to Somalia.

Video: Camp Closure in Kenya Leaves 260,000 Somali Refugees Without Options

$
0
0

Kenya’s repatriation program for Somali refugees, fueled by fear and misinformation, does not meet international standards for voluntary refugee return. Many refugees living in Kenya’s sprawling Dadaab camp, home to at least 263,000 Somalis, say they have agreed to return home because they fear Kenya will force them out if they stay. In May 2016, the Kenyan government announced plans to speed up the repatriation of Somali refugees and close the Dadaab camp in northeastern Kenya by November. Kenyan authorities, with officials from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), then stepped up a 2013 “voluntary” repatriation program.


Kenya Is Abandoning Somali Refugees

$
0
0

After 25 years of vicious conflict that has cost countless lives and displaced millions of people, peace has finally broken out in south-central Somalia — at least that's what Kenya says. And the UN refugee agency, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) has joined Kenya to tell the world it should now focus on helping as many refugees as possible to return home.

But I recently spoke with some of the estimated 320,000 Somali refugees in Dadaab, Kenya, the world's largest refugee camp. And it's clear that peace is the last thing some of those signing up for UNHCR's $400 repatriation cash handout are discovering.

A newly arrived Somali refugee is forced out of the queue outside a reception centre in the Ifo 2 refugee camp in Dadaab, near the Kenya-Somalia border, in Garissa County, Kenya

A newly arrived Somali refugee is forced out of the queue outside a reception centre in the Ifo 2 refugee camp in Dadaab, near the Kenya-Somalia border, in Garissa County, Kenya, July 28, 2011

A number of refugees told me they had returned destitute to destroyed Somali villages without health care provision and schools, or faced danger as armed groups continue to clash in and around their villages, including towns. After doing their best to survive, they fled back to Kenya, once again as refugees.

One of them is "Amina," a 38-year-old single mother. After a decade in Dadaab, she decided to try her luck and returned in January 2015 with her five children to her village, Bula Gudud, in the Lower Juba region, hoping to rebuild her life.

She told me: "After two days back home, fighting broke out between government troops and al-Shabab [armed Islamist group]. I could hear the bullets. My children were so scared. They just ran around, trying to get out of the house." The following day, Amina fled to the closest city, Kismayo. She had no relatives there but hoped she'd find safety and work to feed her children. She found neither.

She and her family barely survived for nine months with other displaced civilians in Kismayo's appalling internally displaced persons' camps. After a man in a government uniform raped her, a common occurrence in the unprotected and aid-starved camps across the country, Amina gave up and 10 months ago begged her way back to Dadaab.

But her ordeal didn't end there. The Kenyan authorities have refused to re-register her and her children as refugees, and UNHCR has not reactivated her ration card or given her any food.

"If we send 1,000 people home under the voluntary repatriation agreement but we then register 1,000 new arrivals, we would not get the job done," a Kenyan government official in Dadaab told me

Kenya, Somalia and the UNHCR had signed an agreement in November 2013 on the "voluntary repatriation" of Somali refugees. It says that both countries and the UN would make sure that Somalis return voluntarily and safely and would get help to resettle back home. A few months later UNHCR said that "the security situation in many parts of ... Somalia [is] volatile [and] protracted ... conflict has had devastating consequences, including massive displacement, weakened community structures, gross human rights violations and the breakdown of law and order".

But Kenya has repeatedly referred to this agreement as evidence that it is time for all Somalis to go home, stressing that the UN agency should help Kenya "expedite" refugee repatriation.

Somali refugees have a collective memory of previous repeated attempts by Kenyan security forces to coerce "voluntary" returns. In late 2012, Kenyan police in Nairobi unleashed appalling abuses in an effort to enforce an illegal directive to drive tens of thousands of urban Somali refugees into the Dadaab camps and from there back to Somalia. In April 2014, Kenyan security forces, primarily police, carried out a second round of abuses against Somalis in Nairobi and then deported 359 a month later without allowing them to challenge their removal.

In May 2016, Kenya announced that "hosting refugees has to come to an end", that Somali asylum seekers would no longer automatically get refugee status and that the Department of Refugee Affairs, responsible for registering and screening individual asylum applications, would be disbanded.

So far, thankfully, the Kenyan police in Dadaab appear to have been acting properly and the refugees told us they had not been harassed or directly coerced. But they are all aware that the government intends to close the camp by the end of November. Everyone we spoke to expressed the fear that those who do not take the voluntary repatriation assistance package now will be forced back later this year with nothing.

Since mid-2015, Amina and at least another 4,000 Somali refugees have either returned to Kenya after facing conflict and hunger back home or fled to Dadaab for the first time.

But with refugee registrations now closed, Amina and the others won't get food aid. Their survival will depend on the kindness of neighbours or relatives whose own rations were slashed last year by a third because of a funding shortfall. Amina and other returnees and new arrivals will also be the first to face arrest and deportation for "illegal presence" if Kenya shuts down Dadaab in three months.

International and Kenyan law require the authorities to make sure that anyone seeking asylum in Kenya is fairly heard and, if found to need protection, gets it. As long as Kenya continues to shred its commitments, Amina and thousands of others like her will languish hungry and destitute in legal limbo and wake up every morning wondering whether they are about to be deported back to the dangers that many have repeatedly fled and still fear.

ICC: Countries Should Press Kenya on Obstruction

$
0
0

(Brussels) – International Criminal Court (ICC) member countries should address the court’s finding of obstruction by Kenya in the case against President Uhuru Kenyatta, Human Rights Watch said today. An ICC trial chamber on September 19, 2016 referred a finding of non-cooperation in the now-withdrawn case against Kenyatta to the court’s membership, known collectively as the Assembly of States Parties.

“The ICC has squarely called out Kenya’s breach of its obligations to the ICC,” said Elizabeth Evenson, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch. “ICC member countries should make sure the message is heard in Nairobi that they will not turn a blind eye to the government’s obstruction of justice.”

2013_Kenya_kenyatta

President elect Uhuru Kenyatta (L) and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) Chairman Issack Hassan stand for the national anthem in Nairobi on March 9, 2013.

ICC judges in January 2012 had charged Kenyatta, then deputy prime minister and finance minister, with crimes against humanity for his alleged role in organizing and financing murder, displacement, and rape during the violence that followed Kenya’s 2007 presidential election. Although the prosecutor withdrew charges against Kenyatta in December 2014, the issue of whether the government of Kenya should be sanctioned for non-cooperation in the case remained pending.

 
The ICC trial chamber had previously declined to send a finding of non-cooperation to the assembly. In an August 2015 ruling, however, the ICC appeals chamber found that inconsistences in the initial decision required a re-examination of the issues. The prosecutor, the victims’ counsel, and the government of Kenya made new submissions to the trial chamber. On September 19, the trial chamber entered a formal finding of non-cooperation and referred the matter to the assembly for action. It did so because it considered that “the [Assembly of States Parties] would be best placed to address the lack of cooperation, in order to provide an incentive for the Kenyan Government to cooperate with the Court, in relation to [cooperation requests in the Kenyatta case] and more generally.”
 
The decision is the first ICC finding of non-cooperation sent to the Assembly of States Parties related to the failure of an ICC member country to provide assistance to the prosecution’s investigations. Previous findings of non-cooperation against other ICC member countries have related to failures to enforce the court’s arrest warrants.

As an ICC member country, Kenya is obligated to cooperate with the court, including by responding to the prosecution’s requests for assistance with investigations. The Rome Statute, the ICC’s founding treaty, leaves it up to the Assembly of States Parties to decide what enforcement action to take in non-cooperation cases referred to it.

This finding of “non-cooperation” is specific to the Kenyatta case, and relates only to Kenya’s failure to comply fully with the prosecution’s request for tax, bank, company, land transfer, and telephone records. Crimes against humanity charges in a parallel case against William Ruto, Kenya’s deputy president, and a co-defendant, Joshua arap Sang, were vacated for lack of evidence in April 2016.

 
The failure of the Kenyan government to provide records sought by the prosecution in the Kenyatta case occurred against a backdrop of hostile rhetoric from the government against the ICC proceedings. The Kenyatta administration initiated an aggressive diplomatic campaign to lobby leaders, particularly within the African Union, to support ending the ICC’s cases and undermine African support for the ICC, calling the ICC a “toy of declining imperial powers.” It has made repeated efforts to use the annual meeting of the Assembly of States Parties to politicize the court’s proceedings.
 
In 2010, the Assembly of States Parties adopted procedures to guide its response to findings of non-cooperation, which could culminate in recommendations for assembly action at their annual meetings. But the assembly has limited experience in carrying out these procedures. Beyond dialogue with the non-cooperating member country, the procedures do not list specific possible measures the assembly can take. The European Union also has procedures to guide its response to non-cooperation with the ICC.
 
For other tribunals, countries have shown a willingness to enforce court orders. Targeted sanctions and conditions for providing assistance have been used to bring about cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
 
The assembly should ensure a consistent and effective approach toward non-cooperation findings to bring about the cooperation by ICC member countries that the court needs to deliver justice, Human Rights Watch said. 
 

When it comes to findings of non-cooperation on the part of ICC member countries, ICC judges have issued previous non-cooperation decisions against the governments of Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Malawi, and Uganda for allowing President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan to visit their countries without facing arrest. Al-Bashir is wanted on two outstanding ICC warrants. A determination on South Africa’s cooperation is currently pending before the ICC regarding the failure of South Africa to arrest Bashir during a June 2015 visit to the country, in violation of both ICC obligations and two orders by a domestic court.

Activists from across Africa highlight the need for African governments to support the International Criminal Court in a video by 21 African and international nongovernmental organizations. 

 
“Defaulting on legal obligations to the ICC should not be allowed to go unchecked,” Evenson said. “Member countries should take Kenya’s obstruction seriously, as they should whenever the court’s judges find that a state party has breached its obligations to the court.” 

Previous Developments in the Kenyatta Case
In early 2014, as a February trial date neared, the prosecution admitted that its investigations had hit a dead end, partly because a key insider witness confessed to giving false testimony. In March 2014, judges granted a temporary adjournment in the trial to permit the prosecution and the government of Kenya to work together to resolve a long-outstanding request for Kenyatta’s financial and other records, which the prosecution hoped could provide additional evidence. When the vast majority of records had still not been produced by October 2014, the prosecution asked the judges to refer Kenya to the Assembly of States Parties for non-cooperation and adjourn the case indefinitely until the government complied.

In two December 2014 decisions, the judges rejected the prosecution’s request to postpone Kenyatta’s trial, finding that further delay – particularly since the prosecution was uncertain whether even full cooperation by the government would lead to sufficient evidence – would be incompatible with the interests of justice. They faulted Kenya for failing to provide records sought by the prosecution but decided not to send a formal finding of non-cooperation against Kenya to the assembly. They found that the non-cooperation did not warrant sanction due in part to concerns about the prosecution’s diligence in following up on cooperation requests and also given their decision not to further adjourn the case.

The ICC prosecution then withdrew its charges against Kenyatta. It sought leave to appeal the decision on non-cooperation, however, leading to the August 2015 ruling by the appeals chamber.

Long-Delayed Kenyan Law Should Make Life Easier for NGOs

$
0
0

Better late than never. Kenya looks set to implement legislation that should make life easier for nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), more than three years after the bill became law.

Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta prepares to address a news conference after attending the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) summit in Somalia's capital Mogadishu, September 13, 2016.

Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta prepares to address a news conference after attending the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) summit in Somalia's capital Mogadishu, September 13, 2016.

Earlier this month, the Kenyan government announced plans to immediately implement the Public Benefits Organizations Act (PBO). In January 2013, then-President Mwai Kibaki signed the measure into law, but implementation was derailed by the looming elections in March of that year. The incoming administration, under President Uhuru Kenyatta, should have put the law into effect, but that did not happen.

Instead, Kenyatta’s administration, just emerging from a toxic campaign in which his party blamed NGOs for instigating crimes-against-humanity charges against Kenyatta and others, proposed draconian amendments placing restrictions on independent groups. That included capping foreign funding for NGOs at 15 percent – a measure apparently modeled after Ethiopia’s repressive law.

The law should streamline registration of NGOs and strengthen accountability. The current regulatory body, the NGO Coordination Board, will be replaced with the PBO Authority. Over the past year, the NGO Coordination Board made a range of controversial decisions, including arbitrary deregistration of NGOs, that the incoming PBO Authority will need to confront in order to restore confidence.

Implementation of this law will be a challenging and time-consuming task, especially with the August 2017 elections looming. As Kenya waits on the cabinet secretary to make good on his promise two weeks ago, it is worth mentioning that the implementation must be done in good faith and should not lead to more proposals for repressive amendments. Most importantly, implementation should not lead to heavy-handed bureaucratic oversight of NGOs, or tactics that obstruct the work and impact of NGOs and, more broadly, undermines Kenyans’ rights to free expression, association, and assembly.

Nairobi: Celebrating Efforts to Spark Change

$
0
0

(Nairobi) – The fifth annual Human Rights Watch Film Festival will be held in Nairobi on November 14-19, 2016, with a program of five award-winning documentary films.

The films highlight the many social and legal obstacles that activists and ordinary citizens have to overcome, often at great personal cost, to obtain justice. The films will be shown at three venues; the Alliance Française de Nairobi, Monrovia/Loita Street; The Rift Valley Institute, Laikipia Road, and Pawa 254, on Statehouse Crescent Road. A question-and-answer session will follow each screening. Admission is free.

Women holding Panther flags. Photo courtesy of Pirkle Jones and Ruth-Marion Baruch.

Women holding Panther flags. Photo courtesy of Pirkle Jones and Ruth-Marion Baruch.

“This year’s Human Rights Watch Film Festival in Nairobi hosts an array of films that look at people who have taken action to change not only their personal stories but the narratives of their communities and societies,” said Andrea Holley, strategic director, Human Rights Watch Film Festival, who will be in Nairobi for the festival. “By coming together to share these stories, we believe we can create new narratives and establish a platform for discussing human rights issues from diverse perspectives.”

The films document the struggle for social justice by the United States African-American community, radicalization in Pakistan, migration by Africans to Europe, the struggle against dictatorship in Nigeria, and the work of a band of Kenyans seeking retributive justice using digital technology as a people’s court in the face of what it views as the country’s failing criminal justice system.

Film Screenings

The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution: Monday, 14 November 2016; 6.45 p.m.; 116 minutes (Alliance Francaise de Nairobi)
Stanley Nelson – US – 2015 – documentary

The festival will open with The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution, a feature-length documentary with first-person accounts by early members of the organization and rank-and-file members in cities like Chicago, Oakland, Los Angeles, and New York, as well as the voices of lawyers, journalists, scholars, police officers, and former FBI agents.

In the 1960s, change was coming to America. Those seeking to drastically transform the system believed radical change was not only feasible, but imminent. For a short time, the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense put itself at the vanguard of that change.

An opening reception will be held at 6.15 p.m.

A discussion will follow the screening.

Among the Believers: Tuesday, 15 November 2016; 6.30 p.m.; 84 minutes (Alliance Francaise de Nairobi)
Hemal Trivedi, Mohammed Ali Naqvi and Jonathan Goodman Levitt – Pakistan – 2015 – documentary

Among the Believers charts the personal quest of a firebrand Pakistani cleric to impose a strict version of Sharia (Islamic law) throughout the country, as a model for the world. But while the Red Mosque Islamic School offers food and lodging, many people in Pakistan seek to stop the scourge of violence that it encourages.

The film uses extensive access and chilling footage to explore the spread of the radical ideology of the Red Mosque, which trains children from a very young age to devote their lives to jihad.

A discussion will follow.

Mediterranea: Wednesday 16 November 2016; 6.30 p.m.; 107 minutes (Alliance Francaise de Nairobi)
Jonas Carpignano – Italy – 2015 – drama

The world in recent months has watched in horror and been shocked at the TV images being beamed into their living rooms about the perilous and fatal journeys of Africans and others from the Middle East to Europe in a desperate bid to escape intolerable war and economic hardships in their countries of origin. During the first five months of 2016 alone, more than 2,500 refugees and migrants have been killed trying to cross the Mediterranean.

Mediterranea charts the struggle of Ayiva and Abbas, Burkinabe brothers who cross oceans and deserts to pursue a better life. But the promise of opportunity soon turns to frustration when they face the hardships of racist small-town Italy. The film is built on the narrative of the 2010 Rosarno riots and the real life journey of Koudous Seihon, an African immigrant who is the lead actor. The filmmaker, Jonas Carpignano, injects a powerful sense of urgency into this film.

The film from the filmmaking collective behind Beasts of the Southern Wild, had its international premiere during critics’ week at Cannes in 2015.

A discussion will follow.

Tuko Macho: Thursday, 17 November; 6.30 p.m.; 90 minutes (Alliance Francaise de Nairobi)
The Nest Collective – Kenya – 2016 – special program

The Tuko Macho organization, a vigilante cell run by the ruthless Biko, snatches up criminals from Nairobi streets and puts them on trial before the world’s most powerful public court – the internet, whose anonymous viewership decides whether the offenders should live or die.

Tuko Macho (meaning “We Are Watching” in Swahili), is an interactive web series created and produced by The Nest Collective. The films follow a series of kidnappings carried out by a vigilante cell. Three selected episodes from the series will be shown.

Join us for an interactive discussion with the creators of this series, moderated by Agnes Odhiambo of Human Rights Watch.

The Supreme Price: Friday, 18 November; 6.30 p.m.; 93 minutes (Rift Valley Institute)
Joanna Lipper – Nigeria – 2014 – 75m – documentary

The Supreme Price tells the story of Hafsat Abiola, daughter of the human rights heroine Kudirat Abiola, and Nigeria's then-President-elect M.K.O. Abiola, who won a historic vote in 1993 that promised to end years of military dictatorship. Shortly after the election, his victory was annulled and he was arrested. While he was imprisoned, his wife took over leadership of the pro-democracy movement.

The Abiola family’s intimate story unfolds against the epic backdrop of Nigeria’s evolution from independence in 1960, through a series of military dictatorships to present day civilian rule as Hafsat Abiola continues to work to transform a corrupt governing culture into a democracy capable of serving Nigeria's most marginalized population: women.

A discussion will follow.

The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution: Saturday, 19 November 2016; 2.30 p.m.; 116 minutes (PAWA 254) – REPEAT

A discussion will follow.

For more information about the Human Rights Watch Nairobi Film Festival, please visit:
http://ff.hrw.org/nairobi

Kenya Rights Body Begins Inquiry Into Security Force Abuses

$
0
0

Kenya has taken a step forward in stemming rampant abuses by security forces. The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR), a constitutionally mandated body, today started investigating how insecurity has affected human rights in the increasingly restive coast region, where there have been scores of allegations of abuses by security forces.

Kenya police officers on patrol in the coastal town of Lamu in June 2014 in the wake of a series of attacks in Lamu and Tana River counties.

Kenya police officers on patrol in the coastal town of Lamu in June 2014 in the wake of a series of attacks in Lamu and Tana River counties. Kenyan security forces responded to the attacks with abusive operations targeting Muslims and ethnic Somali Kenyans in the two counties.

Most of these abuses stem from security forces’ heavy-handed response to Al-Shabab attacks. Coastal communities have paid a heavy price. In June 2014, Al-Shabab launched a deadly night raid, killing at least 49 people in the coastal town of Mpeketoni, the first of a series of attacks in Lamu and Tana River counties over the next weeks. An investigation by several human rights organizations such as Haki Africa and Muslims for Human Rights (MUHURI) found that Kenyan security agencies were abusive in responding to the attacks. Haki Africa was the first to debunk the notion promoted mainly by politicians that the attack was linked to the political opposition, fingering Al-Shabab and highlighting key human rights concerns

Human Rights Watch found that security forces were slow to respond to these attacks, and when they did they rounded up villagers – mostly Muslims and members of Somali ethnicities – and beat and arbitrarily detained them. All those arrested were either released without charge, had charges dropped, or were acquitted for lack of evidence. 

Calls for accountability for security force abuses in the coast region have been ignored. Numerous allegations of abuses, including extrajudicial killings and disappearances, have barely been investigated. A damning report of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), a civilian police accountability institution, catalogued the botched police response to the Al-Shabab attack in Mpeketoni, but the government hasn’t acted on its recommendations.

The KNCHR inquiry offers a rare opportunity to highlight more recent abuses and renew public attention on this worrying issue. KNCHR chair Kagwiria Mbogori said at least 303 cases of extra judicial killings, disappearances, torture, and related human rights violations have been reported along the coast since 2013. And this is before the inquiry, which will likely receive other fresh complaints, even kicks off.

It’s essential that this time the findings and recommendations of the inquiry are not brushed aside by government officials, as has been the case in the past. Kenyans are yearning for justice.

Viewing all 5846 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>